Is your main HT.? Thats 10k worth of subs your running.I would guess that most reasons fall under practical concerns and constraints:
Spouse/family/roommate/neighbor considerations
Lack of space/flexibility for placement
Budget limitations
And then there's the integration factor - some people try it without going to the trouble of learning how to do it right, with poor results..."Full range is best, subs are too boomy", etc.
For anyone unfettered by the above (or with a fair amount of flexibility), I can't think of many compelling reasons not to.
It's the primary system for both music and HT. If it were strictly for music, two of those subs would be plenty.Is your main HT.? Thats 10k worth of subs your running.
I have one. It goes down to maybe 25 Hz. This adds a total of four or five notes below what my other four full range speakers already can do. So it doesn't do much, except during movie explosions. It's okay I guess; I could easily dump it and not miss it. It certainly doesn't add anything noticeable to music. (Sorry, subwoofer bros!)Interested in the thoughts of those who don't run subs in their systems & the why of it. I already get enough data on the reasons to do it but not much on reasons not too.
I have speakers with 12" bass drivers and always thought that I do not need a sub. But when I finally got it (18"), it made a huge difference. I had bad room mode at 40Hz and null at 80Hz, and had to use Dirac to correct them. With subwoofer I chose the location, crossover frequency and phase adjustment to compensate for room problems. Now I can happily live WITHOUT DSP.Interested in the thoughts of those who don't run subs in their systems & the why of it. I already get enough data on the reasons to do it but not much on reasons not too.