How many agree with this bot's choice of review sites?

[Grimoire]

Here are some trusted sources for TV reviews, with details on their methodology:

• AVForums: This UK-based site is highly respected within the enthusiast community. Their reviews often come with detailed measurements and are accompanied by community discussion, which can provide additional context and user experiences.
• What Hi-Fi?: Another UK-based outlet with a long history, What Hi-Fi? is known for its rigorous side-by-side testing in dedicated listening and viewing rooms. They declare their testing process is controlled and consistent, using benchmark products for comparison.
• Expert Reviews: This UK-based site tests products extensively, including in-lab measurements for brightness, colour accuracy, and input lag. They also consider real-world performance.
• Rtings.com: Though US-based, Rtings provides an extremely detailed, data-driven approach to TV reviews. They publish raw data and test bench methodology, allowing readers to compare objective performance metrics side-by-side.

From the infinitely wrong most of the time Google bot, whatever it's called.

What Hi-Fi? Rigorous???

 

[kemmler3D]

Here are some trusted sources for TV reviews, with details on their methodology:

• AVForums: This UK-based site is highly respected within the enthusiast community. Their reviews often come with detailed measurements and are accompanied by community discussion, which can provide additional context and user experiences.
• What Hi-Fi?: Another UK-based outlet with a long history, What Hi-Fi? is known for its rigorous side-by-side testing in dedicated listening and viewing rooms. They declare their testing process is controlled and consistent, using benchmark products for comparison.
• Expert Reviews: This UK-based site tests products extensively, including in-lab measurements for brightness, colour accuracy, and input lag. They also consider real-world performance.
• Rtings.com: Though US-based, Rtings provides an extremely detailed, data-driven approach to TV reviews. They publish raw data and test bench methodology, allowing readers to compare objective performance metrics side-by-side.

What Hi-Fi?

I think it's far from the worst site out there, but IIRC it's pretty subjectivist for the most part.

 

[Grimoire]

I think it's far from the worst site out there, but IIRC it's pretty subjectivist for the most part.

I believe it to be totally objective in it's only criterion, ie maximising advertising revenue.

 

[JSmith]

Should add Vincent Teoh @;

HDTVTest - TV Reviews 2024 – Best OLED & Mini LED TVs

Buying a TV? Read our expert, scientific & unbiased reviews to help you choose the best OLED (including QD-OLED) or Mini LED television.

www.hdtvtest.co.uk

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCcCYOO2uYPnG-21WDOWdwew

JSmith

 

[Descartes]

The worst are on the internet, people like Darko, Andrew Robinson

 

[Keith_W]

The worst are on the internet, people like Darko, Andrew Robinson

I wouldn't say that Darko is the worst (although I agree he's pretty bad). THE worst was Srajan Ebaen from 6 Moons.

 

[MattHooper]

The worst are on the internet, people like Darko, Andrew Robinson

Why?