Bass correction is about right though. In the review they don't account for Harman/missing dB-effect/room modes effects in the lows and assume that what comes out of the mic is what one hears. It is the case at average SPL above 90dB but not many listen that loud
.
They wine about way too much bass but I think everyone knows that on a stock HD650 bass extension (at least not perceived bass extension, that's the whole point) is 20Hz (-3dB) opposite 1kHz.
Given the plot it looks like it is based on a KEMAR HATS. Compensation used was wrong, not suited for headphones.
I mean everyone who has ever analyzed (and even Tyll admitted) the plots may have noticed the slope above 1kHz and all headphones showing a rather sharp 10kHz peak which isn't there. This is caused by the way calibration files are made. My reason not to trust HATS above 5kHz. Below 1kHz it will be hard to 'f up calibration. Only compensation might be slightly different.
Anyway I asked the designer where the 6kHz boost comes from. He is an interesting fellow with a dito background.