oleg87
Addicted to Fun and Learning
So perfect, so musical, so unaltered
Wow, unbelievably divorced from reality. Or maybe not so unbelievable... The (a) problem is hucksters like that throw around a bunch of terms to make it sound good to those users with no technical understanding, then those same users will debate you to the death with the same hogwash.I went back to their site to see if the whole thing was like this. Holy crap, it gets even worse. I feel like I need to take a long shower after wallowing in this morass of dishonesty.
Exactly the kind of b.s. they would present. Try again, after the required reconstruction filter, that most of the "NOS R2R" crowd ignore.View attachment 393681
So perfect, so musical, so unaltered
Brandolini's law aka the bullshit asymmetry principle. It takes an order of magnitude more energy to refute BS as it does to produce BS.Maybe the experts here should set up a thread to compile “marketing white papers that qualify as disinformation”. I’d enjoy it.
I estimate you are off by at least one if not more orders of magnitude. But I have not measured it, nor wish to.Brandolini's law aka the bullshit asymmetry principle. It takes an order of magnitude more energy to refute BS as it does to produce BS.
Training is more important than testing.Test forum members hearing like you test equipment. I like it! Could be displayed in a graph for quick reference. Not sure how it saves time and energy but...
I went back to their site to see if the whole thing was like this. Holy crap, it gets even worse. I feel like I need to take a long shower after wallowing in this morass of dishonesty.
This leaves a lot of room for FUD.The basic principle is extremely simple you subtract output from input an creates an error signal throw that back into to loop together with the input at the desired polarity
Is that the worst ever? It's close to the classic "Point One" level, which was a milestone for amplifiers many decades ago.When DACs go bad! View attachment 393572
One of for sure. Some stinkers in the list .Is that the worst ever? It's close to the classic "Point One" level, which was a milestone for amplifiers many decades ago.
Sorry if I misread what you said, but how often do we find DACs that measure badly enough for that to be audible?No. I never suggested that.
Yes, I found the PS Audio, which was outrageously priced in addition to its other sins.One of for sure. Some stinkers in the list .
Should be obvious, time domain and all that. If you sample the output, go back to the input there is time delay. So then you mix in a delayed signal all out of line. Peaks go into dips and vice versa. Clearly destroying low level detail. Clearly wiping out all subtlety in music which we humans are clearly highly attuned to hearing. Gone is depth, low level detail, and imaging.Fascinating how a simple feedback loop , some pcb traces and resistors ( and possibly something else if fancy ) can recognise music and destroy only that ?
I know. I stalled out on my blind test compilation. But ASR is big enough to crowdsource, if focused. It would be a service to consumers to understand how ill-supported their accepted notions are. We are sort of doing it by being here, but not quite in as focused a way as is possible.Brandolini's law aka the bullshit asymmetry principle. It takes an order of magnitude more energy to refute BS as it does to produce BS.
You are hearing things that are not in the music reaching your ears.
I am in this "hobby" long enough to don't need others opinions about what I am hearing or not.A few conclusions here - your brain is constructing a reason to use such a cable, the previous cable was poorly designed and made and - shock horror - the Rega dac isn't as well designed as Rega and many users think/thought it is or was (the figures do tell a mediocre story sadly).
Sorry if my English is not the most correct. Is not my native language.
On the other side an opinion based on (someone) personal thoughts is an opinion and nothing more.
But (re)moving a post from a thread just because this opinion is in disagreement with reviewer "absolute truth" makes me think maybe this is not the best place to search for useful information.
Generally I am looking to learn and not to seek validation for what I already know.
Yes, it seems that a bit of "fuzz" is being equated (mistaken?) for "soul or emotion to music". This is not "high fidelity".If it is different then it will be adding audible distortion over the blameless RME, so it won’t be more lifelike or dynamic it might sound a little fuzzier which you may prefer.
Keith