Most interesting. I was on AA a little 25 years ago. ASR is closer to the tech as it's evolving, and less snobby than AA was (is?) about cheap gear. Great seeing $25 dongles tested!I feel -- a little odd -- posting this, but I just saw a discussion of this at (of all places) audioasylum.
![]()
Audiophile Potpourri: December 2025 web traffic among audio sites, price of cables poll, and flashback 2014 while looking ahead.
A blog for audiophiles about more objective topics. Measurements of audio gear. Reasonable, realistic, no snakeoil assessment of sound, and equipment.archimago.blogspot.com
I read the article, and these FACTS are rather interesting..I feel -- a little odd -- posting this, but I just saw a discussion of this at (of all places) audioasylum.
![]()
Audiophile Potpourri: December 2025 web traffic among audio sites, price of cables poll, and flashback 2014 while looking ahead.
A blog for audiophiles about more objective topics. Measurements of audio gear. Reasonable, realistic, no snakeoil assessment of sound, and equipment.archimago.blogspot.com
Notice the number for Audio Science Review (1.74M). I know that many purely subjective audiophiles try to ignore this site, but let's face the facts! If you've been an audiophile for a little while or if you've searched for product reviews, you know about ASR. More importantly, you know that there's good information on this forum about the technology and it's a good place to see if objective-leaning audiophiles consider certain products snake oil. In modern audiophilia, objective testing has carved out a substantial amount of traffic which is not going to go away. I believe that this is reflecting an important shift in consumer sentiment and appetite - a cultural shift among hobbyists.
Stereophile, TAS, and HiFi+ as traditional print audiophile magazines one might still find at the local bookstores have combined web traffic of only 55% of ASR as of late 2025.
I think the following quote from the same blog post is relevant:I read the article, and these FACTS are rather interesting..
WoW!
![]()
Head-Fi, Steve Hoffman, Audiokarma and AVS Forum are also sites which are either exclusively forums or contain popular forums. Those are in the same order of magnitude as ASR concerning visits. If you visit a forum, it's not unreasonable to think that you might come back to it multiple times a day, probably because you follow an interesting discussion. In contrast to that, visiting any audio news site daily seems not that likely - maybe with the exception of short time windows like audio shows or CES, during which lots of new gear gets presented that you want to be aware of.Realize that these are just estimates of total visits and speak nothing of the time spent in each visit, or unique visitors. In general, we would expect larger numbers to visit forums since there should be repeat-visitors following discussions and offering replies.
They have a whale of a time though.What Hi-Fi is bigger than all of them and is still a stronghold of subjective blubber.
Great -- now I am going to be distracted for the rest of the day striving to concoct a baleen pun...They have a whale of a time though.

The "headphonesty" LLM article happens to be targeted at ASR readers. There is going to be more and more of this going forward. Someone can use image-generators, text-generators etc. to put up sites catering to any number of different views, cheaply. So when you run across something that closely reflects your own views, be suspicious. LLMs do sycophancy well!Even though Headphonesty is straight-up unacknowledged and unethical AI trash that shamelessly aggregates genuine audio reporting and commentary right up to the verge of plagiarism, the article mentioned in this thread’s OP offers a valid thesis on emerging power shifts in hi-fi reviewing.
Too bad the venue and fake byline means it’s like pulling an interesting informative newspaper clipping out of a steaming pile of fresh horse manure.
True but these numbers are not from bSphonesty. That is the beauty of measurements.The "headphonesty" LLM article happens to be targeted at ASR readers. There is going to be more and more of this going forward. Someone can use image-generators, text-generators etc. to put up sites catering to any number of different views, cheaply. So when you run across something that closely reflects your own views, be suspicious. LLMs do sycophancy well!
Some of us noticed early on and posted to ASR:Already discussed here: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...eviewing-and-the-hi-fi-market-at-large.68925/
This thread is also relevant (thread titled "Please do not link to headphonesty site"): https://www.audiosciencereview.com/...lease-do-not-link-to-headphonesty-site.68004/