Thanks for this explanation. The whole point of my inquiry into the use of attenuators was due to my personal fears about connecting high efficiency drivers directly to even relatively low wpc power amps when using active crossovers; see last section of post 974.
So, to minimize both risk of hearing damage accidents and minimize sound quality losses, is it better to design the L Pads to be used between the outputs of a DAC like this
https://www.merging.com/products/interfaces/hapi
Horus & Hapi mic preamp and ADDA converter has some of the best specifications of any I/O on the market today. Have a look at the numbers here.
www.merging.com
and the power amp or between the amplifiers and speaker drivers?
I would put the L-pad between amplifier and speaker drivers, mostly because that's what I'm familiar with. If someone with experience using L-pads further up the signal chain tells you otherwise, follow their advice over mine.
If you decide to go with an L-pad between amp and speaker drivers, you could do this: Buy an inexpensive L-pad and use that to dial in the correct loudness for your horn, then disconnect the L-pad and measure the series resistance and the parallel resistance, and then you would know what values you want for the (presumably) fairly expensive resistors for your permanent, fixed-value L-pads.
If these are clones are they just as good as the JBL originals?
https://reconingspeakers.com/product/jbl-m2-horn-lens-5025594/
I don't think that's a clone. I think that's the real deal. I think you can see one in action here:
pbnaudio.com
I like the way Peter Noerbaeck mounted the horn upside-down to slightly decrease the center-to-center spacing between horn and upper woofer.
https://reconingspeakers.com/product/jbl-m2-horn-lens-5025594/
4.) While best achieving accurate imaging, what aspects of this waveguide may cause errors in the sound? For example, if the waveguide narrows too much towards the HF band, resulting in a very limited horizontal and/or vertical sweet spot even when listening within the critical distance. Of course, while I am looking for constant directivity, thus absolutely NOT looking for any kind of omnidirectional sound, I would hope to be able to stand and without moving beyond a ~ 4 ft radius not lose any appreciable x & y coverage.
Imo for good imaging across an area, not just right smack in the sweet spot, you want the off-axis curves to be essentially less-loud-replicas-of the on-axis curve, as this will give you the option of using time/intensity trading to get good imaging across the listening area.
Four feet is not a very wide listening area, so imo you don't need a really wide constant-directivity pattern. The off-axis curves of the 18Sound XT1464 track the on-axis curves exceptionally well across an arc 60 degrees wide from 1 kHz to about 11 kHz, and it's still pretty good south of 1 kHz and north of 11 kHz.
5.) Or if sharp edges inside the waveguide or around the mouth cause resonances or diffraction effects, respectively, how to fix them?
It's not really possible to "fix" that kind of acoustic problem with EQ. The signal still gets diffracted. EQ can make a significant improvement at one microphone location but at different locations the equalization will not be correct.
Please don't tell me that if I want to go with the best waveguide for my situation that I must also use active crossovers to apply that eq accurately enough to avoid audible problems.
I've been using waveguides & waveguide-style horns that are constant directivity (or nearly so) for about twenty years and imo passive crossovers work just fine. But if you're going to be doing the crossover yourself, active crossovers are a lot more user-friendly.