This is a question that comes up a lot: how loud must those surround speakers go compared to the fronts?
While it's very tempting to just have all speakers of the same model, it is often impractical and economically undesirable. So what gives? What can you get away with?
Instinctively, my impression was that in general, the surround speakers are much less loud on average than the LRC's. But is that true?
Well, science is to the rescue I guess
. I found this paper that looked precisely into this question among other things.
They analyzed 4 soundtracks and concluded the following:
Well, 4 soundtracks aren't very much, but at least it's a start. All of these show lower SPL for the surround channels.
Another interesting thing is the center channel, which shows you should have a much bigger one, than R and L.
So, what do you guys think?
While it's very tempting to just have all speakers of the same model, it is often impractical and economically undesirable. So what gives? What can you get away with?
Instinctively, my impression was that in general, the surround speakers are much less loud on average than the LRC's. But is that true?
Well, science is to the rescue I guess
They analyzed 4 soundtracks and concluded the following:
The material studied demonstrates that the surround channels are operating at about 5...10 dB lower maximum level than the front monitor triplet. Most likely this also applies to the height output channels in immersive audio presentation systems, too, due to the tendency to concentrate a lot of the action in the front at the screen in cinema mixes
Well, 4 soundtracks aren't very much, but at least it's a start. All of these show lower SPL for the surround channels.
Another interesting thing is the center channel, which shows you should have a much bigger one, than R and L.
So, what do you guys think?