• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Historical # Numbers

Astoneroad

Major Contributor
Joined
Feb 16, 2022
Messages
1,339
Likes
2,664
Location
A cave in the desert
This for you history buffs or number nerds... often embodied in the person. I know that we've got some professional historians like @Vacceo and @Willem as well as ex military guys like @AdamG, who have interesting numbers at their fingertips. This is about historical numbers that seem too outrageous to be true... yet are. For example, in Henry VIII's 36 year reign, he executed approx. 57,000 people, mostly his own subjects. Do the math and you come up with 4.3 killings every day for 36 years.

Or how about Genghis Khan... "According to genetic studies, around 8% of all males descend from Genghis Khan. This is due to the widespread distribution of his Y-chromosome lineage across the region of the former Mongol Empire, likely resulting from his extensive conquests and large number of descendants" Assuming, but can't be verified, that an equal number of females descend from him, that makes 16% of the current human population... or 1.2 billion humans carry his genetic material... YIKES!!!

Let's not turn political or too gruesome please... even though I lead with Henry's tallies. Let's say anything before the 17th century has more leeway in that regard, otherwise no subsequent death tolls please. Otherwise... let's keep it related to history, or science/math. Watch ya got?
 
In 2004, it took the world a year to add a gigawatt of solar power — now it takes a day.

1739034862864.png


 
This for you history buffs or number nerds... often embodied in the person. I know that we've got some professional historians like @Vacceo and @Willem as well as ex military guys like @AdamG, who have interesting numbers at their fingertips. This is about historical numbers that seem too outrageous to be true... yet are. For example, in Henry VIII's 36 year reign, he executed approx. 57,000 people, mostly his own subjects. Do the math and you come up with 4.3 killings every day for 36 years.

Or how about Genghis Khan... "According to genetic studies, around 8% of all males descend from Genghis Khan. This is due to the widespread distribution of his Y-chromosome lineage across the region of the former Mongol Empire, likely resulting from his extensive conquests and large number of descendants" Assuming, but can't be verified, that an equal number of females descend from him, that makes 16% of the current human population... or 1.2 billion humans carry his genetic material... YIKES!!!

Let's not turn political or too gruesome please... even though I lead with Henry's tallies. Let's say anything before the 17th century has more leeway in that regard, otherwise no subsequent death tolls please. Otherwise... let's keep it related to history, or science/math. Watch ya got?
The Black Death killed one of every three inhabitants of Europe and who knows how many in the Middle East and North Africa, so go guess...
 
The Black Death killed one of every three inhabitants of Europe and who knows how many in the Middle East and North Africa, so go guess...
50-60% in Europe according to this...

Pandemics-Timeline-Death-Tolls-OWID (Medium).png



But as text notes, the data is sparse.
 
Just a reminder to folks . Facts are facts . Facts about elections /politics are political by definition. Facts about many other things can be used to further a political narrative but are not inherently political .

Let's not let this go the way of many things and go political .
 
Vincent Van Gogh produced a very large number of paintings (as well as other art) in a relatively brief active career. The raw data works out to a painting every 3-4 days, although he grew faster and is said to have been cranking out a painting a day just prior to his demise. Quite prolific, indeed.

 
Vincent Van Gogh produced a very large number of paintings (as well as other art) in a relatively brief active career. The raw data works out to a painting every 3-4 days, although he grew faster and is said to have been cranking out a painting a day just prior to his demise. Quite prolific, indeed.

So, that would mean that they are not so rare (if we could locate them all).
But, still, Possessing one is a high numerical value in whatever currency you use.
 
I find it extremely unfortunate the media and writers alarm with "millions" and the like, while not revealing percentage. People percentages, budget percentages, numbers spread over years vs one year, more.

In social science, a small percent can have a large impact. How we get information in numbers and discuss them is falling into disrepair with falling education, along with knowledge of statistics.

I read polls. More trustworthy polls use respected sampling. The exact question wording is important - read that. Then read the crosstabs, breakdown by demographics: age, sex, ethnography, income, views, etc. It is like tests we do in audio, the equipment and conditions. It is like the experimental conditions and measurements in a scientific paper, documented so it can be independently reproduced as a test.

So around numbers is a framework of honesty and trust.

My math education petered out with complex number calculus. The book the Tao of Physics by a physicist proposes that as mathematicians create new mathematics systems, scientists find a way to use them to solve problems.

Of course, we ASR geeks are used to numbers in dB for noise floor and distortion when tested to a specific output level. Percentages were the old way when the technology made them high.
 
Last edited:
In 2004, it took the world a year to add a gigawatt of solar power — now it takes a day.

View attachment 427055


How numbers can deceive. Adding a Gwatt daily seems like a lot. Its not. We use 180,000,000 Gwh a year and the demand increases by 1.5% yearly, or 2,700,000 Gwh. Solar currently produces only 4,600 Gwh/year. Supply and demand both increase exponentialy, will solar ever catch demand, it dosnt look like it. Not doing the Differential equation.

 

How numbers can deceive. Adding a Gwatt daily seems like a lot. Its not. We use 180,000,000 Gwh a year and the demand increases by 1.5% yearly, or 2,700,000 Gwh. Solar currently produces only 4,600 Gwh/year. Supply and demand both increase exponentialy, will solar ever catch demand, it dosnt look like it. Not doing the Differential equation.


Something wrong with your solar figures there.

A GW of power will generate around 3,000GWh/year on it's own (assuming average around 8h per day generation - 1GWx365x8). If 2023 and 2024 each added 1GW per day, that would be 730 additional GW just from those years, generating 2.2million GWh /year just from those two years installations.

Somewhat more than the 4600GWh/year you claim is currently being produced.
 
I wonder: The percentage of the population?
France saw the worst being the most populated kingdom. Add the 100 year war, the Jacquerie, the plundering of the white companies...
 

How numbers can deceive. Adding a Gwatt daily seems like a lot. Its not. We use 180,000,000 Gwh a year and the demand increases by 1.5% yearly, or 2,700,000 Gwh. Solar currently produces only 4,600 Gwh/year. Supply and demand both increase exponentialy, will solar ever catch demand, it dosnt look like it. Not doing the Differential equation.


1739050690061.png
 
Back
Top Bottom