You can't make that assessment because you don't know the provenance of the files. There's no difference between lossless compressed formats.
You might be allowing the interface, the software, the hardware or anything else to be affecting your decision.
Sorry, but yes, I can...Don't want to hijack this thread or litter it, so "I shall say this only once" . . At least one member here had music he produced published by Tidal, and then checked what they had streaming and proved that the file that was online was not exactly what he had sent in and the quality he provided, if you browse the last year reviews here you'll find it, it was promoted to the first page..
. Furthermore, I don't want MQA ever, just ordinary PCM/CD quality, maybe will try 24 biit /96khz just to check it out, but I am stuck with a lot of MQAed albums and their garbage, and many remastered or silentely re-worked versions, that clearly are a different mix version of the original I already own. Sure, many won't be Tidal's fault, they may have been handed a different version, but as far as MQA, and the fact that at least once ( and that would have to be a really, really unfortunate instance that they got caught the only time they did it in those 80 million tracks) what they sold the public was different and lower quality (hence) than advertised and what they got supplied.
Why stay? Unfortunately, tired of replacing cd players and buying and storing cd 's, can't get Qobuz over here, and do not want Amazon Hd for other reasons.
Final thought ..: with Tidal outputted through UAPP and a DAC like RME, with their imunnity to jitter, etc, if something sounds different, its not the gear: either it doesn't, and its your head,( and I can accept that) or it actually does, and its in the file it is replaying..and we've seen what you can expect on that front.