• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Help with room treatment

Mindscapes

Member
Joined
Oct 13, 2025
Messages
21
Likes
15
Hello!

I'm looking for help in evening out my room decay times and L and R imbalances.

The room has the following characteristics:

  • Width: 11.80 m
  • Lenght: 4.84 m
  • Height 3.14 m
  • Total volume 179.2 m3
  • Front windows covered by drapes

The speakers are a pair of Kef Q7 meta with the following placement:
  • Listening position: 1.90 m from back wall
  • Listening height: around 85 cm
  • Speakers distance from front wall: 88 cm
  • UniQ height: 88.5 cm
  • Speaker center to speaker center: 2.17 m
  • Speaker center to listening position: 2.25 m
  • Speakers toe-in: around 15° from pointing straight at the wall, firing slightly behind my head.
As you can see in the attached pictures, right now i have only my front wall treated with 6 120x60 panels made of 120kg/m rockwool and one 120x60x10 (i know, not the best density for this application). Speakers are off center and firing along the short wall as this is the placement that gave me both the shortest decay i could manage and avoided a very nasty room width null in the bass region when my listening position was centered and the speakers where firing along the long wall. All this to say that i tried various listening and speakers position both firing along the short and long wall and this one is the one that gives me the shortest decay and straightest FR of the bunch, but left me with asymmetry to manage.

From my limited understanding, besides the long decay in the lowest frequencies that i'm managing with the Room Shaper plugin, my main problem from the rt60 graph are quite longer decays in the 150-350 hz region, high energy streaks i can see in the spectrograms too. There's also the ceiling bounce at around 8 ms in the etc which would improve with a cloud, but implementing that would be problematic. Theres also something at 3ms in the left etc i can't pinpoint. I don't have anything near or in between the speakers besides the amps and dac on the floor.

I was thinking of making three big absorbtion panels, 180x120x20, with two 40 kg/m rockwool 6cm deep panels inside separated by 8 cm air between them. I would put two between the speakers and the listening position, about 1 m to the left and right of the sofa, a sort of faux walls to restore a bit of symmetry, and one centered behind the listening position.

I can also make two 120x120x20 perforated panels absorbers with a fairly wide Q to target the 150/300 hz zone, and treat the two front corners of the room.

Would this be sensible treatment or can i do better? I will make my panels, so i can quite manage the cost and am open to various suggestions. I can do whatever with the room besides removing the wardrobe and shelves.

Thanks for the help!
 

Attachments

  • Frequency Response.jpg
    Frequency Response.jpg
    188 KB · Views: 123
  • SPECTROGRAM L DSP.jpg
    SPECTROGRAM L DSP.jpg
    172.7 KB · Views: 128
  • SPECTROGRAM R DSP.jpg
    SPECTROGRAM R DSP.jpg
    185.4 KB · Views: 148
  • topt and edt L no dsp.jpg
    topt and edt L no dsp.jpg
    153.9 KB · Views: 120
  • topt and edt L with dsp.jpg
    topt and edt L with dsp.jpg
    153.2 KB · Views: 111
  • topt and edt R no dsp.jpg
    topt and edt R no dsp.jpg
    154.3 KB · Views: 103
  • topt and edt R with dsp.jpg
    topt and edt R with dsp.jpg
    153.3 KB · Views: 134
  • Room1.jpg
    Room1.jpg
    165.3 KB · Views: 147
  • room3.jpg
    room3.jpg
    404.5 KB · Views: 153
  • ETC L.jpg
    ETC L.jpg
    43.2 KB · Views: 113
  • ETC R.jpg
    ETC R.jpg
    43.3 KB · Views: 134
First, I'm no real expert. That said, your spectrograms don't seem to decay at all. The room must be incredibly reflective. If you clap your hands does it echo? What are all the surfaces? Compare your impulse responses to the ones that I just posted. Are the big square things behind the spkrs plate glass windows? So let's get some more info. Cheers,
 
I am quite curious what happens when you change speaker orientation and use wardrobe as absorber? You should get both better back to front refractions ratio and room much out of the way. I know you don't want to look at wardrobe but you can dress that differently and trow in a thick rug in front. If you can't do that and those are windows behind your rock wool plates try with a chamber instead with two rows of accustic curtains top to bottom 30 cm deep. Part most people don't get is chamber not absolute density/mass of material. Did you consider getting gymnastics mat for the gym? Those thick coconut/camel one's are best and most healthy absorbers there are.
What a hell should those cut outs out of measurements suppose to be? What mic are you using, I want to see uper 70's to low 80's SPL measurements and multiple of them (with time reference of course) done properly when you can get as low ambient noise you can to see where room lies regarding decay on it's own. Attach measurement files, less people will look at them but you will get more useful answers. Use @Keith_W manual (in about, signature, Free REW eBook) regarding measurements if you need to.
 
Rotate setup 90 degrees.
Are people really happy with giant windows behind their setup or next to it? I know I'm not.
 
• Like a concert hall, the longest dimension should be front to back… this is especially true of your room

• After doing it a couple times, my opinion is that the best sound for serious listening is attained by configuring your room as a LEDE (live end, dead end). All of the area from the listener to the speakers is treated to be as acoustically “dead” as possible. Behind the listener, it’s untreated. In practice, you want those reflections to be as diffuse as possible.

Whether you can do these adjustments is up to you.

As you’re planning it now, it will be OK, but certainly not great.
 
Back
Top Bottom