No audible differences that I could detect.
Keith
Keith
No.Better than Purify?
How about Nord Acoustic have they been measured by Amir or other reputable sources?
![]()
Nord Three 1ET9040BA MB MKII Mono Block Power Amplifier - Nord Acoustics Ltd
The Nord Three MB is our Flagship Purifi EIGENTAKT 1ET9040BA mono block amplifier. Consisting of amp module, Hypex PSU and our own custom designed inputnordacoustics.co.uk
If you are in US, contact this guy and ask him for advise [email protected]Better than Purify?
Maybe not a good idea. NAD recommends minimum speaker impedance of 8 ohms in bridge mode.if i wanted to buy Apollon Audio Premium monoblocks it would cost me the same as buying two NAD M23s and running them in bridge mode.
According to this lab report (https://www.hifinews.com/content/nad-m23-class-d-power-amp-lab-report) they push 420W at 1 Ohm.Maybe not a good idea. NAD recommends minimum speaker impedance of 8 ohms in bridge mode.
The blades have “.. effective resistance, or EPDR (footnote 1), lies below 2 ohms between 30Hz and 39Hz and between 813Hz and 881Hz, and below 3 ohms between 3.9kHz and 14kHz. With minimum EPDR values of 1.23 ohms at 34Hz and 1.64 ohms between 813Hz and 881Hz, the Blade Two Meta presents amplifiers with a somewhat demanding load.”
The manual saysAccording to this lab report (https://www.hifinews.com/content/nad-m23-class-d-power-amp-lab-report) they push 420W at 1 Ohm.
Also, the Purifi Eigentakt is supposed to be load-invariant.
Load invariant means that the frequency response is the same whatever the load - not always the case for class D amps - not that they can push whatever load.Also, the Purifi Eigentakt is supposed to be load-invariant.
Idk who if anyone has published tests for that build. But given the way these things are built I'd gladly trust it on spec.How about Nord Acoustic have they been measured by Amir or other reputable sources?
![]()
Nord Three 1ET9040BA MB MKII Mono Block Power Amplifier - Nord Acoustics Ltd
The Nord Three MB is our Flagship Purifi EIGENTAKT 1ET9040BA mono block amplifier. Consisting of amp module, Hypex PSU and our own custom designed inputnordacoustics.co.uk
Running two 1ET9040BA amps in bridge mode – given Apollon Audio prices – costs around 6.5k EUR (incl shipping) for me. For 300 EUR more I can get 2nd hand MC452.Bridging Purifi 1ET400A or 1ET6525SA based amps is not a good idea with low impedance speakers, better use a 1ET9040BA based amp.
Running two 1ET9040BA amps in bridge mode – given Apollon Audio prices – costs around 6.5k EUR (incl shipping) for me. For 300 EUR more I can get 2nd hand MC452.
No. Nor are the Purifi better.Better than Purify?
I don't remember recommending ApollonRunning two 1ET9040BA amps in bridge mode – given Apollon Audio prices – costs around 6.5k EUR (incl shipping) for me. For 300 EUR more I can get 2nd hand MC452.
Do they sound any different? If you believe that amplification has a sound signature?No. Nor are the Purifi better.
Thank you, I didn’t realize that when bridge in mono they were not able to go down to 2OhmsThe manual says
Low impedance speakers (under 8 ohms) are not recommended when using Bridge Mode as these may cause the amplifier’s thermal cut-out to operate if played at high levels.
It’s not my money so I honestly don’t really care. But if it were, I’d be looking for something else
edit: just saw the price of these. For two of them, you could buy a Sanders Magtech and have stability and more power than you ever need.
If it were my money I’d certainly not be buying the NADs for these speakers.
If they have a signature it is written in invisible ink.Do they sound any different? If you believe that amplification has a sound signature?