Hello all
Please forgive what may be a very silly question...
This is not a silly question at all, BRVO.
Choosing the right combination of headphones and amp requires a somewhat sophisticated knowledge and understanding of power, voltage, current, and impedance... especially if you are operating on a lower budget.
Some folks here obviously know what they are talkin about. While I can get easily confused by watts, volts, amps and ohms.
So bear that in mind as you read the following. I'll try to address a few of the questions re impedance though. And maybe someone else will jump in, if I begin to stray too far from the facts, and general logic.
As I understand it, the main differences between the 32, 80 and 250 ohm DT-770 is the thickness of the headphone's
voice coil. The 250 ohm DT-770 has the thinnest voice coil. And the 32-ohm has the thickest. While the 80 ohm version is somewhere in between.
The thinner coil on the 250 ohm version has the most
mass, because it is (presumably) the longest, and has the least space between the wires or coils. The greater the mass, the more the voice coil will impede the flow of current. Ergo, greater
impedance. That may be a bit overly simplistic. But I think that is more or less how Beyerdynamic explained the differences to me, back when I was trying to decide between the different headphones.
I tested both the 80 and 250 ohm versions of the DT-770. And
did find some noticeable differences in their sound... which is to be expected.
There were noticeable differences in their volume, as well as subtle, but also audible differences in their frequency response and clarity imo. Some of which were probably a bit more noticeable on a
higher impedance amp.
The 250 ohm version has the lowest sensitivity and efficiency of the three different headphones. And the 32 ohm version has the highest. While the 80 ohm version is in between. So it makes sense that the 250 ohm version was quieter than the 80 ohm version, when used on the same amp. I have listened to dozens of different headphones over the years. And the high impedance Beyers have been some of the
quietest.
High impedance and low sensitivity may not sound like good attributes to have in a headphone. But imo, this usually results in the best
sound quality. It does make the headphone somewhat "harder to drive", and lower in volume though... unless you can supply it with a bit more power to compensate.
The lower volume has some other advantages though. Since the signal is more attenuated
downstream, in the transducer, it can be run hotter
upstream, with a lower potential noise floor.
The higher impedance on the 250 ohm version means it also has the highest
damping factor, and best electrical damping of the three headphones. Which, imo, also translates to better clarity, and sound quality.
So what you loose in volume and sensitivity is a gain in other ways, namely lower potential noise and distortion. And better overall signal clarity.
In my listening tests, the 250-ohm version also seemed to have the best extension in the sub-bass and treble. Or best
tonal depth. And this seemed to be also confirmed (more or less) by
Crinacle's frequency response graphs of the two headphones.
The basic takeaway from all this is that the 32 ohm version of the DT-770 is the easiest to drive of the three headphones. And consequently would use the least power, while delivering the greatest volume on a low-powered portable device. But it will probably also have the worst sound quality of the three headphones.
The 250 ohm version will be the most forgiving in terms of its sound quality, especially on higher impedance amps. But it is also the hardest to drive, and will require the most power. I wouldn't describe it as a "power hog" though. And based on NTK's figures, I suspect there is more than enough power to drive it to very good volumes on an AVR like the one you're considering. (I suspect that would be the case with most integrated amps and AVRs. Though this is not something I've personally tested.)
I went for the 250 ohm version because I like its more extended frequency response. And because I mostly use it on a dedicated headphone amp, which has ample power for its needs. And may also use it on some pro audio gear where the impedance is higher, and sound quality is not as good. All of my gear is quite inexpensive though. And the fact that the 250-ohm version is more forgiving in terms of noise and damping certainly helps.
If anything it is probably being
over-damped on my current 1 ohm amp (a Bellari HA543). Which could reduce its longevity. And probably wastes some energy. The detail and clarity is outstanding though, for the price. And I generally listen at very moderate to low volumes, which helps.
Alot of people will choose the 80 ohm version though, because it's somewhat easier to drive. And a little more flexible with different powered devices. Most seem to avoid the 32 ohm version, for the reasons stated above.
The DT-770 is a rather bright, and dry sounding headphone though. And it needs EQ imo to give it better warmth, and to fix some other imbalances in its frequency response. So depending on the type of music or content you listen to, it may not have the best sound in terms of its default sound signature, and tonal balance. You could probably correct some of that with the built-in EQ or tone controls on an AVR though.
I'm also not a big fan of the DT-770's cable, particularly on the 250 ohm version. The cable is single-sided, so it pulls more on the left ear than the right. And it is not detachable. And it's also coiled on the 250 ohm version.
Also, if the 470 ohm spec on the Yamaha receiver's headphone output is correct, that would only provide a 0.53 damping factor (250/470 ohms) with the highest impedance DT-770! Which would probably still be
too low to eliminate potential audible distortion that could result from inadequate electrical damping. By most accounts, the impedance of a transducer should be at least
6 to 10 times the source impedance to provide sufficient damping for this. The 250 ohm version would, I think, clearly be the best choice of the three headphone impedances though, from this standpoint... Perhaps that 470 ohm impedance on the Yamaha's headphone jack is wrong though?
An amp or headphone jack with an output impedance as high as 470 ohms would not provide effective
bridging for most headphones currently on the consumer market. So this makes me wonder a bit if there could be some error in that spec.
Since the DT-770 is a closed headphone, it will also not give you quite the same sense of openness, breadth, or dimension in its sound (audiophiles usually refer to this as "soundstage") as a more open headphone could.