- Joined
- Dec 25, 2023
- Messages
- 647
- Likes
- 709
A long time ago (when I was little) I dreamed of having my own "home theater" but my parents always said it would be too expensive because we had no good space to put it. But now, I see why it would be so expensive, at least on the audio side. You'd need a receiver with amplifier, a whole bunch of speaker cable, and expensive theater speakers. The total cost would be in the thou$and$. Combine that with a nice projector and you are easily pushing $10,000, a totally unreasonable proposition for most people.
Fast forward to last weekend. After having upgraded my 2x Kali LP-6v2 + WS6.2 desk setup (the value king for such a setup) to the Neumann equivalent, the Kalis just sat around in my room doing absolutely nada for months. I then realized there was a perfect use for them. Right now, the humble living room TV has a slightly wimpy Hisense HS2100 soundbar that sounds far better than TV speakers but has obvious deficiencies once you compare it to something with better FR and distortion and wider stereo image. What if I just replaced the soundbar with the Kalis? So I did just that with a Fosi ZD3 as the bridge from HDMI ARC to RCA (the WS6.2 then converts that to balanced).
The results were incredible. I watched "The Substance" and it sounded just like at the theater with (almost) all of the bass and all of the clarity so I could actually hear what they were saying. Seriously! And this is with a setup costing less than $1000. 5000 lumen laser projectors are now around $1000 too (you don't actually need 4k).
The question is, am I missing anything significant here? I know this setup isn't surround but I have never noticed surround making a large difference in movies, and the TV is often used for radio type usage anyway. I also love how my EV ZLX PA speakers are a similar price but also enable larger scale outdoor movies using this same basic idea as with the Kalis. Why aren't more people jumping on this cost saving opportunity?
Fast forward to last weekend. After having upgraded my 2x Kali LP-6v2 + WS6.2 desk setup (the value king for such a setup) to the Neumann equivalent, the Kalis just sat around in my room doing absolutely nada for months. I then realized there was a perfect use for them. Right now, the humble living room TV has a slightly wimpy Hisense HS2100 soundbar that sounds far better than TV speakers but has obvious deficiencies once you compare it to something with better FR and distortion and wider stereo image. What if I just replaced the soundbar with the Kalis? So I did just that with a Fosi ZD3 as the bridge from HDMI ARC to RCA (the WS6.2 then converts that to balanced).
The results were incredible. I watched "The Substance" and it sounded just like at the theater with (almost) all of the bass and all of the clarity so I could actually hear what they were saying. Seriously! And this is with a setup costing less than $1000. 5000 lumen laser projectors are now around $1000 too (you don't actually need 4k).
The question is, am I missing anything significant here? I know this setup isn't surround but I have never noticed surround making a large difference in movies, and the TV is often used for radio type usage anyway. I also love how my EV ZLX PA speakers are a similar price but also enable larger scale outdoor movies using this same basic idea as with the Kalis. Why aren't more people jumping on this cost saving opportunity?