• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Harmonics being stripped & Measurements not adding up. SMSL D100, SMSL D10, Fosi Audio DS2 all using Cirrus Logic CS43131 chips...

Earwax

Active Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2025
Messages
174
Likes
28
Location
Vancouver, Canada
This Must Be Stated and understood if we as a whole civilization want to continue forward in an upward motion.

AUDIO PURITY

We all Want It, We All Crave it, but it`s a hole that the rabbit gave up on ?

Amirm has stated this was his main driving force for all his time spent explaining in videos and written documentation, so lets give him some support of praise and see if we can`t top up his effort to reach that dream of purity ?

NO body online ever states facts about Harmonic`s being intact and fully present exactly the same as the output file..

Why not state it clearly instead of sound stage, warmth, brightness as it`s the harmonics that put it all together.

After that fact explaining how high and low frequencies differ in loudness would make the most sense.

Example Fosi Audio DS1 vs DS2.

The newer DS2 uses the Cirrus Logic CS43131 DAC chips it appears they are the cause for stripping away harmonics. Of Course circuit design would need to be studied but 3 out of 3 is very questionable.... Keep reading.

The DS1 uses the ES9038Q2M DAC Chips it appears to have ALL the Harmonics present I say appears because I have not measured the output source file and compared it to the DS1 output but it is clearly without a doubt MUCH higher in purity !!!!

DAC`s I have listened to critically that all appears to have ALL harmonics present. SMSL SU1, Topping DX3 Pro Plus, Fosi Audio DS1 ( ES9038Q2M DAC Chips are used in both DS1 & DX3 Pro Plus / AK4493S DAC chips are used in SMSL SU1 )

DAC`s I have Listened to critically that ALL have missing Harmonics. SMSL D100 , SMSL D10, Fosi Audio DS2 ( all these use the Cirrus Logic CS43131 DAC chipset )

Reference tracks using headphones FLAC or Tidal files. even though it`s probably not your music give it a try Disturbed : Conflict only need the 1st minute to compare use the repeating guitar rhythm to clearly hear the missing harmonics.

Track #2 Metallica : And Justice For All. you will notice it is missing harmonics Metallica is notoriously difficult for cheap DAC`s and Cheap amp`s to play with PURITY.

I was using the ATH M50X headphones.

I am, asking. The Masses.

Please consider using some reference data to explain if Harmonics appear to be depleted in your listening tests it would be very helpful to pull us all out of the dumbed-down machine we are being dreamed into....

Amirm has gone to great lengths meaning put much of his personal time into explaining facts with actual DATA and is able to explain it in a clear and precise way that even most average none music oriented people can comprehend. I have watched Hours of his videos on Youtube there is a great podcast if you haven`t seen it`s well worth your time.



It is unfortunate that this loop hole has appeared possibly by a fluke or maybe from crafty sales teams luring people with less experience as it could fool many due to missing harmonics providing the appearance of more separation due to lack of harmonic blending.... Maybe a listening test was done with headphones and those above mentioned people were not musical people.

The DS2 gets extremely high praise and is on the top of the list when in comparison to it`s class of DAC`s, but when you listen to it you clearly will hear it is missing harmonics.


I know this will mean War for some people who may have a financially motivated angle they do exist online sneaky as can be appearing in many forms. Other`s just want to win a fight no matter if sense is made or not.

I do hope for intelligent replies / explanations / insights and no emotional responses.

I mean no disrespect to Amirm but only much thanks and praise, if I can be of assistance in anyway...

If not for Amirm and his data measurements I would have never had the pleasure of owning the Fosi Audio DS1, SMSL SU1, Topping PA5 ii and found a DX3 Pro Plus used on Amazon for $180 Canadian...

Returned the DS2, D100 & D10.

This only came to light after my DS1 died so waiting for the warranty replacement Fosi is sending I bought another DS1 to test the heat performance comparing it to the DS2, D10.

DS1 & DS2 exact same 33C to 35C on the shell, D10 was 37C probably due to that insanely bright blue LED as it was that exact spot the infrared thermometer read the high temp.

D100 was going to stay at my bedside until I listen to it then all hell broke lose, well not exactly but sounded similar :)



It would be great to see if we could all put our ideas together to form a solution that could work without difficulty and time consuming nonsense.


Thank you for your time and patience.
 
I'm afraid you are not making much sense - at least not to me. Do you know what harmonics are?

How are you determining - all harmonics present, or missing harmonics?

Which harmonics are you talking about? Harmonic disotortion? Harmonics of instruments or voices? If instruments/voices, which instruments, which voices, and which harmonics? How are you measuring this?
 
If an individual can be "a sandwich short of a picnic", can a DAC be "a harmonic short of a symphony"?
 
I don’t think there are any known signs of current DACs lacking in harmonic reproduction. Have you considered tightening your listening evaluation to better rule out biasing and conflating factors?
Any of these could influence your results:
Not being consistent with song selection or listening to the same song from different releases with altered mastering
Not matching listening volume
Switching sources too slowly
Continuing evaluations despite signs of listening fatigue
Using different playback software or settings
Inconsistent headphone positioning
Expectations bias from prior knowledge

This should be the first step if you care about distinguishing real differences between devices from a strong position.
 
Last edited:
I don’t think there are any known signs of current DACs lacking in harmonic reproduction. Have you considered tightening your listening evaluation to better rule out biasing and conflating factors?
Any of these could influence your results:
Not being consistent with song selection or listening to the same song from different releases with altered mastering
Not matching listening volume
Switching sources too slowly
Continuing evaluations despite signs of listening fatigue
Using different playback software or settings
Inconsistent headphone positioning
Expectations bias from prior knowledge

This should be the first step if you care about distinguishing real differences between devices from a strong position.
Not to mention not knowing what device is playing.
 
NO body online ever states facts about Harmonic`s being intact and fully present exactly the same as the output file..

You can be the first!

REW can create a test tone (and a file) with specified harmonic content.

Set something up and run it through your system that strips harmonics and report back.

1746372876051.png
 
[..] NO body online ever states facts about Harmonic`s being intact and fully present exactly the same as the output file..
Why not state it clearly instead of sound stage, warmth, brightness as it`s the harmonics that put it all together.
Look at the frequency response (FR). If it is flat within the audio band no harmonics can get lost.

Warmth and brightness can be deduced from FR as well. Soundstage collapses if crosstalk is too high (< 20 dB), changes in the phase might be able increase it.
 
Last edited:
AUDIO PURITY
It only has to be better than human hearing. ;) Easy-peasy for a DAC!!! (And easy to demonstrate in a proper-scientific blind ABX test.)

If you can't hear it, is it "audio".

Imagine watching your TV from across a football field. Do you need high-definition with details you can't see?

And yes, all good DACs preserve the harmonics in the audible range. It's also been demonstrated in blind listening tests that ultrasonic harmonics don't make a difference unless they are causing intermodulation distortion (or other distortion/alterations down in the audible range.
 
Another drive by - as far as I can see.
 
Isn't the CS43131 more like a formidable challenger to the big guys at an attractive price?
 
It was already stated measurements do not always prove 100% purity with delicate harmonics.

Cowardly insults and nonsense babbling are not helping this forum.


I`m Grateful for Amirm`s measurements and reviews they have helped me with much success with the exception of the DS2.

They have Proven to be TRUE as far as my general entry level of understanding goes along with my exceptional listening skills no doubt due to being Earwax FREE for many years now.

A few simple examples of the measurements adding up.

I bought the Fosi V3 stereo 32 VOLT and not being impressed with it frequency response I returned it. To me it ruined the sound staging.

The PA5 ii is a MUCH higher purity amp that is without question far far above the Fosi V3.
Even though the higher frequencies are a bit louder than a neutral frequency response it absolutely did not hinder my listen enjoyment only improved it many fold.
Maybe check the Gain settings of you music player app and set them to No Gain if you can while using this amp ?
What a SWEET LITTLE AMP it killed my Harman Kardon AVR 140 even using the Pure Analog mode and same dac it was night and day difference as far as purity and clarity.

I highly recommend anyone starting out or looking for an affordable clean beautiful sounding analog amp to consider PA5 ii before wasting time and money.

After being so impressed with the PA5 ii I bought the B100 mono blocks along with the D50 iii only due to Amirm`s extensive reviews with very much truthful data logging that I now finally have confidence in...

The B100 does have the very neutral frequency response as per Amirm`s chart, my journey for audio purity in my price range has hit it`s mark this would have been so much more painful and time consuming with much stress and wasted time without Amirm`s reviews.

So I owe Amirm a LOUD THANK YOU !!!!
 

Attachments

  • Topping B100 Monoblock amplifier balanced power into 4 ohm load vs frequency measurement.png
    Topping B100 Monoblock amplifier balanced power into 4 ohm load vs frequency measurement.png
    26.2 KB · Views: 52
  • Topping PA5 II Stereo Amplifier Audio Balanced Power 4 ohm vs frequency Measurement.png
    Topping PA5 II Stereo Amplifier Audio Balanced Power 4 ohm vs frequency Measurement.png
    29.8 KB · Views: 53
  • Fosi Audio V3 stereo amplifier budget Power 4 ohm vs frequency measurement.png
    Fosi Audio V3 stereo amplifier budget Power 4 ohm vs frequency measurement.png
    29.9 KB · Views: 51
Last edited:
It was already stated measurements do not always prove 100% purity with delicate harmonics
For a DAC they do. There is always the possibility of noise and distortion masking low level signals, in DACs, amps, or otherwise, but that's easy enough to see in standard measurements.

However, a DAC with a neutral frequency response can't fail to reproduce harmonics, because it can't "see" harmonics in the first place.

A DAC recreates a waveform sample by sample. There are ways it might fail at this, but only in the time domain.

Removing harmonics per se is a complicated process that needs to be done in the frequency domain, and even today in 2025 I'm not sure if there are any tools that will do this in real time.
 
Last edited:
It was already stated measurements do not always prove 100% purity with delicate harmonics.

Cowardly insults and nonsense babbling are not helping this forum.


I`m Grateful for Amirm`s measurements and reviews they have helped me with much success with the exception of the DS2.

They have Proven to be TRUE as far as my general entry level of understanding goes along with my exceptional listening skills no doubt due to being Earwax FREE for many years now.

A few simple examples of the measurements adding up.

I bought the Fosi V3 stereo 32 VOLT and not being impressed with it frequency response I returned it. To me it ruined the sound staging.

The PA5 ii is a MUCH higher purity amp that is without question far far above the Fosi V3.
Even though the higher frequencies are a bit louder than a neutral frequency response it absolutely did not hinder my listen enjoyment only improved it many fold.
Maybe check the Gain settings of you music player app and set them to No Gain if you can while using this amp ?
What a SWEET LITTLE AMP it killed my Harman Kardon AVR 140 even using the Pure Analog mode and same dac it was night and day difference as far as purity and clarity.

I highly recommend anyone starting out or looking for an affordable clean beautiful sounding analog amp to consider PA5 ii before wasting time and money.

After being so impressed with the PA5 ii I bought the B100 mono blocks along with the D50 iii only due to Amirm`s extensive reviews with very much truthful data logging that I now finally have confidence in...

The B100 does have the very neutral frequency response as per Amirm`s chart, my journey for audio purity in my price range has hit it`s mark this would have been so much more painful and time consuming with much stress and wasted time without Amirm`s reviews.

So I owe Amirm a BIG THANK YOU !!!!
which is all well and good. But frequency response has nothing to do with harmoncs. And all the nonsense about "stripping harmonics" is just that : Nonsense.
 
Back
Top Bottom