I will repeat my question: what was the high pass setting of the sub set to?Stereophile measurements are quite erroneous in bass, showing a hump that is not there. That aside, no, I did not mess with the software other than selecting 3-way and which sub was in use. I am testing a system. That system takes a day to measure and process. Stereophile is making in-room measurements that take seconds so they can afford to mess with settings.
Regardless, this is the feedback from the company, not stating anything about settings:
"how did you measure the sub? Since it is intended to be used on the floor it must not be measured in free field."
I explained to them that I measure all speakers free field so would not be fair to test theirs differently. Their suggested method is ground measurements like traditional subwoofers are measured. I get that but again, I treated the speaker as if it were one unit, not some separate subwoofer stand-alone. Maybe I should do this kind of testing in the future but for now, all measurements are done the same way (anechoically).
Keep in mind that company provides this measurement for the original LS1:
View attachment 452962
Notice what I have highlighted. That it is a simulation, which I assume it means assumption of room/floor loading. I checked this specifically since I was not getting the same measurement and then noticed the fine print.
Also, anything you can do in DSP of this speaker to boost bass, you can do the same with other speakers. So it is not fair to go and do that to this and not to others.
Finally, I listened to the speaker and noticed deep bass to be soft. It plays it a lot better than any bookshelf but is not in the same class as other full range speakers such as my own.
As stated multiple times, this is a high performance sub but in a tiny enclosure. It is not going to spit out 20 Hz at high SPLs. And it is tuned that way. It may sound more boomy as it excites more room modes if it had lower response. So it increases the chances of good sound for the user.
Also ground plane v.s. free field can explain max 6db difference, your graph shows much more than that, thats why many in this thread have doubts about the results.
Do you still have the speakers?
Last edited: