I just read through the paper. I think its early part about different kinds of clock and their generation is excellent.
On the later portions talking about external clocks, I think the wrong inference is being used. He is saying, "look, we designed this great clock for you, why are you wasting money buying external clocks???" He is doing that in a politically correct way as to not alienate their customers (Digidesign is one of the most popular platforms for audio editing).
As to people liking external clocking with more measured jitter, one very plausible explanation is that they may be imagining it. Their belly says that adding external clock with femtosecond jitter specs and such must make things better and that is what they hear. We cannot use their observations as true and then build a conclusion that people like more jitter.
On the later portions talking about external clocks, I think the wrong inference is being used. He is saying, "look, we designed this great clock for you, why are you wasting money buying external clocks???" He is doing that in a politically correct way as to not alienate their customers (Digidesign is one of the most popular platforms for audio editing).
As to people liking external clocking with more measured jitter, one very plausible explanation is that they may be imagining it. Their belly says that adding external clock with femtosecond jitter specs and such must make things better and that is what they hear. We cannot use their observations as true and then build a conclusion that people like more jitter.