"Also, taking multiple measurements from every angle and estrapuating [extrapolating] what the actual response might be is not exactly high resolution."

Ah I see, it looked a little bit strange to be as well and I was wondering if it was just a summary of the video I found. Linking to Headphone sty seemed to be somehow blocked in the editor, is this the reason for that?I recommend avoiding Headphone sty. It contains primarily AI generated click bait
Please see this post.Ah I see, it looked a little bit strange to be as well and I was wondering if it was just a summary of the video I found. Linking to Headphone sty seemed to be somehow blocked in the editor, is this the reason for that?
www.audiosciencereview.com
As it turns out, James Larson at audioholics measured the original. His setup is far superior to Danny's with elevated speaker, outdoor measurements, etc. Anyway, he did not at all measure the same droop in high frequency that Danny shows:The speaker he’s modding is a L100 Classic, but he compares it to Erin’s measurements of the MKII.
That’s very interesting, but how is it that Danny’s measurements look similar to Erin’s Klippel measurements, as he stated at 16:10 in his video?As it turns out, James Larson at audioholics measured the original. His setup is far superior to Danny's with elevated speaker, outdoor measurements, etc. Anyway, he did not at all measure the same droop in high frequency that Danny shows:
View attachment 530579
Here is James Larson:
![]()
Seems like just like Ascend, his measurements are under-reporting high frequency energy. As such, he is making these speakers brighter.
He also shows the deepest dip at 1.2 kHz whereas James' response shows that to be essentially flat.
Also, when you listen to him talk about the cabinet, he uses words like, "it is going to buzz" making me think he didn't even listen to the speaker before the mod!
Honestly, I think it would be comical at some level. I have to imagine it would be very much along the lines of this Ascend thing.
Gladiator Amir and smudgecat going "eh" at sad Danny will never stop being my proudest meme achievement
AI? You dismiss our MS paint copypaste skills just like that? This is high quality human slop, far superior and actually funny.Please stop with this annoying ai created Pictures. Stay on topic and argue with constructive criticism.
By the way Erin measured the JBL L100 Classic MKII and Danny got the previous non MKII Version in, right? He did not notice it?
Erin measured version ii, not the one Danny tested.That’s very interesting, but how is it that Danny’s measurements look similar to Erin’s Klippel measurements, as he stated at 16:10 in his video?View attachment 530588
As it turns out, James Larson at audioholics measured the original. His setup is far superior to Danny's with elevated speaker, outdoor measurements, etc. Anyway, he did not at all measure the same droop in high frequency that Danny shows:
The man's attitude is just stunning.
Many years ago, I used to debate creationists. It was a waste of time, in that I never did persuade a creationist, but it DID sharpen my mind and help understand how they think. This is the difference between the "ergo hoc" world view and the "post hoc" world view.
"Ergo hoc": The conclusion is reached after examination of evidence. If new evidence is found, the conclusion has to be changed.
"Post hoc": The conclusion is reached first, then evidence supporting the conclusion has to be found. Evidence that does not support the conclusion is discarded. Debate tactics such as deflection, redirection, or shutting down discussion are used. These people typically get very defensive in debates. At some level, they understand they are on shaky ground.
It appears that he has convinced himself that his CLIO is as good as your Klippel. For some measurements, the results should be exactly the same (e.g. impulse response, step response, on-axis measurements down to a certain limit). For some others, it would take him weeks to replicate what the Klippel can do in a few hours, if at all. In theory, it's possible. But I don't fancy spending dozens of hours repositioning the microphone, doing the sweep, labelling them, then processing them all in VCad. Not to mention having to do ground plane measurements for low freqs and then figuring out how to splice all the measurements together.
If that's Danny's closing argument, well, that's the nail in the coffin for him. Because what it says is that five hours of his time, (which isn't in a way really his time, he can do other things in the meantime), isn't worth it. Tell that to his potential buyers of his expensive so-called upgrade kit.[Danny]:
"You seem to be using some lay understanding of how speakers work. You certainly struggle to understand the measurements. 5 hours to get useful information? Who has time for that?
Don't waste any more of my time."
The man's attitude is just stunning.
Concordism is the word you're looking for."Post hoc": The conclusion is reached first, then evidence supporting the conclusion has to be found.
This are Erins measurements, Danny just kopied it from Erins Video. And Dannys measurement looks only kind of similar, thea are taken with waaay less percision and less detail! And not from the MKII version, so different speaker. But even the measurements Amir showed from James Larson show more detail and the peak at 20kHz, so thats not becaus of some average or the klippel!That’s very interesting, but how is it that Danny’s measurements look similar to Erin’s Klippel measurements, as he stated at 16:10 in his video?