Sure works for LogitechI think small wideband speakers may have potential in the nearfield and with DSPing. You have to wonder why there are no comercial solutions like it.
Just add a tweeter and it works fine.
Sure works for LogitechI think small wideband speakers may have potential in the nearfield and with DSPing. You have to wonder why there are no comercial solutions like it.
Just add a tweeter and it works fine.
Well, I guess that may depend on one's definition of commercial.Just add a tweeter and it works fine.
So, do MiniDSPs really suck the life out of the music?
Was that the one @amirm got frustrated trying to download from their website?I'm pretty sure the MiniDSP is fine as long as you don't load the "Suck the Life Out Of Your Music" plugin
FYI I asked them for a sample. Response was that no one needs measurements since they already have made it. And that if I was willing to listen to them and my testing system was up to par, they would consider it. I wrote back:
-----------
Thank you for the response Danny. Your measurements are gated so lack resolution in lower frequencies. And at any rate, are not compliant with CEA-2034 which allows research into audibility of measurements to be applied to them. You also have not shown any distortion measurements. These are the reasons members are looking for me to measure them.
As to listening to them, I always do that. My system for testing desktop speakers is RME ADI-2 DAC driving Purifi based amplifier. These are world-class products. If they are to be tested as stand-alone speakers in a 2-channel system, then I use a Mark Levinson Reference amplifier ($20,000) driven by Matrix Audio streamer ($2,000). Is there a specific requirement you have here that owners need to have to buy them?
-------------
I received a long, hostile and rude response back from Danny saying no one needs my measurements. And that my listening tests are a joke in his eyes and his customers (referring to testing I did for his other speaker I reviewed which I actually recommended). That cabling, room setup, etc. all matter as to whether I have good enough setup to listen to his speakers. I guess I am not qualified in that department to listen to small speakers with 3 inch woofer.
The only thing was offered was for me to go to Austin, eat BBQ and listen to his system.
Meanwhile I received unprompted a super courteous email from the CEO of a top brand of studio monitors saying how much they like my reviews and like to send me samples to test. What a difference.
Agreed. I just "assembled" the Foxtex FF125WK and box kit. Just using the basic DSP tone controls in my study's Yamaha WXA-50 to do rough tweaking. They also have a bad 7 kHz resonance which better DSP would fix. But adding a tweeter may be my next step....I think small wideband speakers may have potential in the nearfield and with DSPing. You have to wonder why there are no comercial solutions like it.
Just add a tweeter and it works fine.
In order, yes and no for the miniDSP 2x4 HD. The result was unremarkable and thus not worth publishing.Have you, or anyone else here on ASR done an ABX with a mini-dsp (flat) in and out of circuit?? Have they published the results for peer review? Ha. I doubt it.
Being an influencer, he just don't need to open door to reviewer. To be fair, there are another kits dealers. Danny is the only known influencer in modifying speaker. I have not see complaints from his customer for his mods. Selling a finish speaker is not his core business. Just look how mark up his own finished product to his kits. Reviews of his own speaker is not that important. He can just turn down every reviewer openly in youtube, in response of his clients to do reviews. Beside he is not the only kits dealers out there. Creative Sound Solution. There is youtube comparison between GR and CSS kits out there.Yeh, that is the bizarre thing about him. He claims I can't possibly have the proper room to test it yet anyone can buy the speaker and use it. If he documented what should be there and no one should use it otherwise, it would be one thing. But it is not.
He sells speakers based on measurements. To the extent he runs away from us measuring them, that can soil his brand and sales pitch.In business, if he can get away from reviewers, why not.
For those who are interested… but how many willfully turn their back on such?He sells speakers based on measurements. To the extent he runs away from us measuring them, that can soil his brand and sales pitch.
A lot right now. Hopefully with the right education this will change in the future.For those who are interested… but how many willfully turn their back on such?
Yes and no. He does measurement, if there is irregularity beyond his tolerance, he will modify it. Other than that it is just parts replacement. Sometime he don't recommend it, all can be seen in his clips. I also have seen him replacing entire complex crossover that measure better than his kits. It is not like he aim to do flat respond like 8361A. His crossover principle is simple. Using his audiophile parts and get the circuit as simple as possible.He sells speakers based on measurements. To the extent he runs away from us measuring them, that can soil his brand and sales pitch.
Again, I am talking about speakers here, not the mod business he runs.Yes and no. He does measurement, if there is irregularity beyond his tolerance, he will modify it.
Finished speaker is $1,100 so quite expensive and way outside of any curiosity I have about his products.Again you can buy his finished speaker but he has no demand to get it review.
The heck you talking about? If I contact Harman and they don't want to send me a sample, they don't insult me and the membership here. If you think this is a good business practice for GR Research, then you don't know anything about business.You are holding Harmon products but instead you do custom installation. Do you want to do hard selling audiophile retail?