• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Going to return my QA 5040s. What should I get?

For me, it was between the KEF Q7 Meta's and the Martin Logan Motion Foundation F2's. After reading user reports and seeing KEF Q Meta measurements posted here about the rolled off high frequencies, I decided against the Q7 Meta's because of my old man ears. I need all the highs I can get! :cool:

I picked up the Foundation F2's on sale(sorry, no longer on sale) and they are pretty good overall speakers. I think they are for somebody who just wants to position them and play them, and not monkey around a lot with EQ and subs or extra tweeters. With the three 6.5 inch woofers, they go pretty dang deep and will hit you a bit, provided you have some good power behind them. And I really like that folded motion tweeter. What I like about it is that is is nicely detailed, yet without harshness or apparent sibilance. You can try them out for 60 days with Crutchfield.


1746037378289.jpeg
 
Likely only thanks to your old ears as ML love them some elevated highs: https://www.spinorama.org/?brand=MartinLogan

I'm not hating, I'm glad that you found a sound that you're happy with, just good to keep this in mind in case someone asks you for recommendations.
Well, the OP commented in post #19(did you read that?) about having "poor hearing" and the inability to hear a super tweeter, so that's why I didn't suspect the ML's would sound overly bright to him. Dunno for sure. And he would get a 60 day trial. I have mine in our family room, which is kind of "dead", so maybe that's partly why they don't sound bright to me.
 
Likely only thanks to your old ears as ML love them some elevated highs: https://www.spinorama.org/?brand=MartinLogan

I'm not hating, I'm glad that you found a sound that you're happy with, just good to keep this in mind in case someone asks you for recommendations.
Well, the OP commented in post #19(did you read that?) about having "poor hearing" and the inability to hear a super tweeter, so that's why I didn't suspect the ML's would sound overly bright to him. Dunno for sure. And he would get a 60 day trial. I have mine in our family room, which is kind of "dead", so maybe that's partly why they don't sound bright to me.
I can't hear the real high stuff that well either. Too many concerts and too many years of competitive skeet and sporting clays. I just don't like the vocal reproduction on the 5040s that I perceive in about half the music I listen too. Someone earlier in the thread describe it as "shouty". I can relate to that description and I will add to thin/lite/lifeless to that. Its not full or weighty and I need and enjoy that. The legit treble is fine. Cymbal crashes and other high-end details I don't hear in other speakers are present and unobtrusive. They don't bother me. I'll even add that most of the piano I hear doesn't sound like a piano. Again no weight not enough presence to it.
 
Come in white also
 
Ok...I used SV3's parametric EQ settings, shoved the speakers closer to the wall and added my new Buckeye NXC500 monoblocks (replacing my Fosi ZA3's). As a side note...WOW...the the Buckeye amps really opened up the speakers especially at lower volumes. Things sound better but there is some weird new resonance that I only here with the parametric EQ on. Overall with the exception of that resonance the sound is much better. It has to be induced by my room. I need to get a umik 1 and do some testing. But things are moving in the right direction. I'm leaning towards keeping these but still buying a switcher and another set of speakers that are warmer and more laid back and just changing things up here and there based on what music I'm listening too.

 
Back
Top Bottom