No, because "sampling theory" "nyquist" and all the other "Monty" BS have nothing to do with the science of human hearing.
It would literally be like asking scientists who have actual science to do, to count angels on the heads of pins. Humans don't sample. So sampling theory is literally a bunch of BS when it comes to actual human sound perception -- it is an artifact of engineering, rather than some kind of universal law that applies to human hearing and sound perception.
There are no biological or neural structures that "sample" -- that's not how human hearing works. If you want to do "audio science" it is very curious to claim to be doing science when the actual subject of the science, who is doing the hearing of the audio, is a radically oversimplified "black box" with no formal theory that defines how it "perceives" . Or even worse, when one's artefacts and tools, combined with blindered-scientific-rationalist-thinking and total lack of knowledge of biology & cognition and/or reality, cause one to create a fake model of human perception that assumes "Nyquist" exists in the brain -- and then sanctimoniuously gaslight those who disagree and actually know something about the subject with insultingly stupid "Monty" videos. (Because "music" and the perception of 3D audio has absolutely nothing to do with sampling a continuous 20 khz sinewave -- rather, it has more to do with the overall system's impulse response to an infinitely short "wave", the exact opposite!).
This "Monty" BS is basically "safe and effective" science -- the science of not knowing, not asking, not finding out, not making a detailed model and theory of the subject being investigated. In short, that's not science -- maybe rename this site to "audio scientism review" and if you sign up now, you'll receive a free monty/redbook-is-safe-and-effective votive candle!
from
https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/psychology/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1408073/full
"REVIEW article:
Auditory localization: a comprehensive practical review"
Front. Psychol., 09 July 2024
Sec. Auditory Cognitive Neuroscience
Volume 15 - 2024 |
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1408073
There should also be questions about 20-20Khz "hearing range" based on stuff like this:
Humans and other animals use spatial hearing to rapidly localize events in the environment. However, neural encoding of sound location is a complex process involving the computation and integration of multiple spatial cues that are not represented ...
pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Cortical mechanisms of spatial hearing