Pearljam5000
Master Contributor
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2020
- Messages
- 7,413
- Likes
- 9,109
I hope Erin will review the 8380 after the 8361
I hope that you will buy a pair of Genelec soon…View attachment 484779
I hope Erin will review the 8380 after the 8361
don't hold yr breathI hope that you will buy a pair of Genelec soon…
A downside in waiting on the fence indefinitely is that our hearing tends to deteriorate with age. Sad but an unfortunate fact of life. If you are unlucky, it can unexpectedly dip more quickly than average or even start to disappear entirely in one ear, as I know all too well about.just buy one(well, a pair) and enjoy, no reason to write so much lmao
A downside in waiting on the fence indefinitely is that our hearing tends to deteriorate with age. Sad but an unfortunate fact of life. If you are unlucky, it can unexpectedly dip more quickly than average or even start to disappear entirely in one ear, as I know all too well about.
Moral of the story: Go for the best you can afford and don't get too fixated on price, or whether something better might come along one day. Life is short -)
I have 8361As, and they tend to measure closer to a flat in-room frequency response than an in-room response with a consistent roll-off (the preferred result). I also used to have KH 420s, which measured closer to the ideal 'high-preference' in-room response curve.Could be.
In the Genelec S360A thread here on ASR, someone got to compare the 8361A to the S360A. Here are his comments:
![]()
Genelec S360 Review (Studio Monitor)
I wish I was still able to regularly (daily) compare different speakers with the knowledge I have acquired in recent years and past experience of demonstrating so many speakers (admittedly lower cost ones than current high end). It seems that dispersion/directivity can make or break a domestic...www.audiosciencereview.com
If I had a Euro for every Genelec related post of him, I could probably finance a complete Genelec 7.1.4 setupI hope that you will buy a pair of Genelec soon…
Your admiration for Genelec drives you too far.A bigger Genelec is always better, of course, unless you live in a very small doghouse that is definitely not intended as a human dwelling.
Of course 8361As have a built in capacity to apply high shelf filters through permutations of a pair of designated dip switches on its back panel.I have 8361As, and they tend to measure closer to a flat in-room frequency response than an in-room response with a consistent roll-off (the preferred result). I also used to have KH 420s, which measured closer to the ideal 'high-preference' in-room response curve.
Applying a high-shelf filter to slightly tilt the treble response fixes this issue with the 8361As, and to me they sound better than the KH 420s after this adjustment. Maybe the user who mentioned the 8361A's harsh sound isn't very familiar with room correction.
No, I'm familiar with room correction, thank you very much. A rising off axis vs on axis response is pretty much never desirable so I'm not sure why this gets a pass.I have 8361As, and they tend to measure closer to a flat in-room frequency response than an in-room response with a consistent roll-off (the preferred result). I also used to have KH 420s, which measured closer to the ideal 'high-preference' in-room response curve.
Applying a high-shelf filter to slightly tilt the treble response fixes this issue with the 8361As, and to me they sound better than the KH 420s after this adjustment. Maybe the user who mentioned the 8361A's harsh sound isn't very familiar with room correction.
Many people have already debated constant versus narrowing directivity in these forums, so I won’t go over it again. In certain rooms, some speakers tend to measure flat above 5 khz, the 8361s, for example, often show this response depending on the environment. When paired with the W371, the bass response becomes even flatter, which makes applying a high-shelf filter even more important. In my room, using a high-shelf filter solves all the harshness issues. That may not be the case of everyone, I understand. S360 is clearly a more safe option. They do not need any shelf filter to sound right.No, I'm familiar with room correction, thank you very much. A rising off axis vs on axis response is pretty much never desirable so I'm not sure why this gets a pass.
If you use GLM I think the dip switches should not be touched.Of course 8361As have a built in capacity to apply high shelf filters through permutations of a pair of designated dip switches on its back panel.
Personally I wouldn't even consider it constant, it's just got errors. What do I know though.Many people have already debated constant versus narrowing directivity in these forums, so I won’t go over it again. In certain rooms, some speakers tend to measure flat above 5 khz, the 8361s, for example, often show this response depending on the environment. When paired with the W371, the bass response becomes even flatter, which makes applying a high-shelf filter even more important. In my room, using a high-shelf filter solves all the harshness issues. That may not be the case of everyone, I understand. S360 is clearly a more safe option. They do not need any shelf filter to sound right.
The Genelec dip switches can however be useful after using GLM to achieve some subtle high frequency tailoring, catering to user preference rather than flat frequency response. Although less flexible, it is likely that using the dip switches in this way will be more transparent than adding an additional processing stage by applying a high-shelf filter through software, external equalizer, or tone controls.If you use GLM I think the dip switches should not be touched.