• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Genelec 8361A Review (Powered Monitor)

Rate this speaker:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 9 1.2%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 4 0.5%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 35 4.6%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 705 93.6%

  • Total voters
    753
There ‘shouldn’t’ be any unless Genelec are using an extremely poor SRC, which was possible twenty five years ago!
So easy to deceive yourself.
Keith
 
There ‘shouldn’t’ be any unless Genelec are using an extremely poor SRC, which was possible twenty five years ago!
So easy to deceive yourself.
Keith
Yes, apart from the above noted potential benefits and already acknowledged risks, that is always going to be a possibility for any impression gained without measurement. Thank goodness for Amir and this site (and our hearing). :)
 
I asked Genelec which is better
8361+W371 or 8381:


First of all, "better" is a very subjective term.
There are similarities in the complete concept (adaptive woofer system combined with a coaxial system), but the Quad Midrange System adds something very unique to 8381. Having two midrange ways (1.8 kHz to 500 Hz with the inner midrange coaxial driver, 500 Hz to approx. 200 Hz (this crossover can be set in a variable way) for the four dome drivers gives you a fantastic resolution and directivity control in the midrange. But for sure the W371 combinations are very good options as well ... ;-)
I listened to 8351+W371 and 8381 recently. Short review, 8381 was more immersive. That's how I'd describe it. There's so many factors that come into play so hard to say. These two setups were in different rooms. My plan is adding W371s to my 8361s, some day.

EDIT: I snapped a photo while I was having a sonic brain massage.
20250522_140813.jpg
 
Last edited:
I listened to 8351+W371 and 8381 recently. Short review, 8381 was more immersive. That's how I'd describe it. There's so many factors that come into play so hard to say. These two setups were in different rooms. My plan is adding W371s to my 8361s, some day.

EDIT: I snapped a photo while I was having a sonic brain massage.
View attachment 453295
Interesting thanks
Immersive because of more bass or bigger soundstage?
 
Interesting thanks
Immersive because of more bass or bigger soundstage?
Tough one. They had all the Ones the same wall, all paired with some sub. The bigger, the better it sounded. It could very well be because listening spot was too far away for the smaller ones, not because they had less low end. It felt/sounded like the bigger the speakers, the more coverage of sound my face got, if that makes sense. I was not able to pinpoint the source of sound on bigger ones. Very diminishing return for the money as I'm sure you can expect.
 
I listened to 8351+W371 and 8381 recently. Short review, 8381 was more immersive. That's how I'd describe it. There's so many factors that come into play so hard to say. These two setups were in different rooms. My plan is adding W371s to my 8361s, some day.

EDIT: I snapped a photo while I was having a sonic brain massage.
View attachment 453295
Could you hear the hiss generated by the W371a?
 
I listened to 8351+W371 and 8381 recently. Short review, 8381 was more immersive. That's how I'd describe it. There's so many factors that come into play so hard to say. These two setups were in different rooms. My plan is adding W371s to my 8361s, some day.

EDIT: I snapped a photo while I was having a sonic brain massage.
View attachment 453295
what do you think the difference between the ones and amphion?
 
Has Amir found any other loudspeakers yet that measure better than the

Genelec 8361A?​

 
Well … the Neuman trio of KH120,KH 150 and KH 420 would qualify.

Peace.
 
Well … the Neuman trio of KH120,KH 150 and KH 420 would qualify.
Do they? SPL limitation of the first two as well vertical directivity of all of them is worse, everything is a compromise.
 
Has Amir found any other loudspeakers yet that measure better than the

Genelec 8361A?​

There are clear compromises and tradeoffs.

8351B has smoother directivity, particularly in the HF (where it matters less), but it is a smaller speaker and its pattern control does not extend as low and it does not play as loud.

S360A has textbook excellent horizontal directivity and plays astoundingly loud for its size, but, somewhat anachronistically, poor vertical directivity. Spectral shifts are heard if changing the height of your head.

The D&D 8C has better pattern control overall, extending lower, but directivity is a little less smooth, and it plays less loud and has fairly high distortion, although for a number of reasons the latter is not objectionable. Vertical directivity is ok.

The 8381A has tight pattern control and several other unique features, plays loud, but has a prominent horizontal directivity error.

The Neumann speakers prioritize the flattest on axis response, constant directivity off axis (which causes a characteristic change in slope at lower frequencies, at the crossover point from the waveguided tweeter to the woofer or mid), and lowest distortion. They also all feature optimized vertical directivity, avoiding the sharp cancelations other speakers show.

The JBL CBT1000 speakers are unique in what they achieve in pattern control and use of reflections, although not without directivity errors.

IMO, these are the top speakers in the field, not considering less prominent or boutique manufacturers. Some others could be mentioned, but we don't have the data to be sure, like Meyer, Danley, Magico.
 
I should have included in the above list:
  • The mighty JBL M2, although we don't have recent Klippel scans, we do have good measurements from S&R.
  • The Perlisten line, although we only have high resolution measurements for one of their smaller speakers thanks to Erin.
  • The recently-measured Grimm LS1, with very wide and smooth directivity.
  • KEF Blade 2 Meta.
  • Kii Three.
Certain models from JBL, KEF, MofI, Arendal, Buchardt, Mesanovic, Revel, ME Geithain, TAD also make sense to consider, although measurements are not always available. I'm sure I'm missing a few obviously good designs and brands.

There's no completely obvious better choice. For the money, the 8361A is hard to beat. For unlimited money and the right circumstances, I would likely choose 8361A and W371A. If i were choosing based on aesthetics, I like the squat S360A. I just wish they would address the vertical cancelations.

1748459323665.png
 
Arindal

The only honest answer you can get in comparison to competitors is when both competitor speakers are in the same room, and both products of different brands are approximately as close to each other and speaker size to each other as it is possible to get.

When the speakers are the same size, then only then does the most honest competition begin, starting from which abilities shine and how many different styles of music sources are reproduced most balancedly or shall we say most believably.

The music could be, for example, violin playing. piano playing, saxophone playing, and high-level popular music. but also heavier heavy metal, where electronic music clearly differs from these other sound styles.

The sound balance of the speakers is measured by how naturally they correspond to realism when you walk outdoors and hear similar sounds there without echoes, thus mirroring your experiences using memory.
 
Back
Top Bottom