To me, they do look slightly worse than the non DSP version.
Side by side:
View attachment 147228
The only real flaw with the 8030c is that slight 1-2dB trough from 2-4kHz. To me it looks like they tried to correct that but messed up the DSP. It looks like they made the filter, 1. Too low in frequency(or two low Q), and 2. Too great in magnitude. They traded a 1-2dB trough from 2-4kHz for a 2-4dB peak from 1.5-3kHz. We know that peaking bothers us more than the opposite. Directivity also seems a little less smooth.
I know there is even some dispute as to whether that depression in the 8030c is even real. I assume it is, as it shows up in all of my in room moving mic measurements(more so than in the anechoic data).
It's not much worse, but I suppose I'm just disappointed that it's not better. I expected it to be at least as good as the same speaker with no DSP, but the DSP seems to have hurt more than it helped.
@Maiky76 's filters for the 8030c seem do a better job of fixing it.
The new problem is even above the frequency at which GLM auto calibrates, so users will have to correct it manually.