Do I understand correctly that the 8030, even though it is mainly designed for near field listening, will produce good sound if I am as much as eight feet away from it? I need good computer speakers but often sit at a short distance from them.
I use them in two modes, in desktop and midfield. In the desktop they are 130 cm apart and I'm about 100 cm to each one. In mid field 170 cm apart and I sit at about 220 from each. In the desktop mode the rule of a 30 degree angle of each with respect to the bisector
given by the manual is broken because the angle is of about 40 degrees, not sure how important is this. In the mid field mode the angle is of about 23 degrees.
Recommended listening distance is more than 70 cm, and critical distance is between 1.5 and 2 m depending on the room. My room is of about 5x3 meters, but very asymmetric with two round corners and all walls of a different size.
The thing is that in the desktop mode I don't enjoy the sound very much. I think it's not a matter of tonality or clarity. Perhaps in nearfield, despite desk reflections, the sound is more direct with less reflections, and that sounds too dry, or unrealistic, subjectively. In the mid-filed set up I enjoy them a lot actually. If I'm sitting at 1 meter and then start going back at about 1.5 meters I start to really enjoy the sound.
I bought them blindly trusting measurements and opinions and I couldn't be happier. However, only for desktop use, I'm not sure if I would pay that amount of money. I have the impression that in nearfield all monitors sound closer to each other than in a midfield situation where room reflections matter a lot and then directivity plays a central role.
I also have the Focal EVO 50, and in a subjective comparison between both, more or less level matched with pink noise, in midfield, gives as a clear winner the Genelec, sounding just better in every aspect, there is nothing a prefer about the Focals, but they are half the price.
Note that I'm not an expert on the subject, just conveying my thoughts.