• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Geithain RL 901K vs Neumann KH420

The issue might be a dealer selling out of area, some, many in fact manufacturers aren’t keen on that, but if there is now no official representation?
Keith
Well i have contacted multiple dealers in germany and uk, most recommended by geithain when i initially emailed geithain seeking a demo. So far no one has had any issues with me being in US. In fact most dealers reassured me they have sent geithains world wide with no issues.

I considered (at the beginning of my trip) driving directly to their facility in Germany and picking up a pair and shipping them back myself to ensure quality packaging. Unfortunately i ran out of time and couldn’t follow through with this option. (Also shipping is less expensive typically for businesses)
But when i contacted Geithain about this they were willing to work with me and even my time constraints. I was forthright about being from the US and they had no qualms.
I wouldn’t say their is “official representation” however i have been in contact with Geithain directly.
 
I agree that they are best I’ve heard. At least as far as active designs go. AsciLab seems promising though. And I think anything with purifi drivers outperform the competition. This is based on research.
It’s a speaker no one’s heard yet with a 6” woofer. Why bring it up vs large Neumann and Geithain speakers? Same for the D&D mentioned several times in this thread as well: speakers with “perfect measurements” are often mentioned together as if they were perfectly interchangeable, but they are not. I’ve heard the D&D and the Neumanns in the same room at the dealer, and then two of the bigger Geithains (901 and 921) at another dealer. For me, 901 > 921 > 420 >>> 8C. In fact, the 8C was a real disappointment, the only thing going for it are the living room-friendly looks.
 
Last edited:
I certainly will! As soon as i narrow down which dealer i go through! Still emailing back and forth with a couple.
Are you looking to demo aswell?
I’ll have a demo at the end of this month. But it’s an untreated room. I guess if they sound good there, they will definitely sound better in my home
 
It’s a speaker no one’s heard yet with a 6” woofer. Why bring it up vs large Neumann and Geithain speakers? Same for the D&D mentioned several times in this thread as well: speakers with “perfect measurements” are often mentioned together as if they were perfectly interchangeable, but they are not. I’ve heard the D&D and the Neumanns in the same room at the dealer, and then two of the bigger Geithains (901 and 921) at another dealer. For me, 901 > 921 > 420 >>> 8C. In fact, the 8C was a real disappointment, the only thing going for it are the living room-friendly looks.
The D&D usess the same passive technique to get a cardioid response as the Geitham K series, but in a smaller (nearfiel) format, so it's logic to bring that to the table. The design was also inspired by Geitham, yhe dev tread was on Diyaudio.com, originally as a diy project, but it became a bussiness.

The Neumann (and it's precestors of Klein & Hummel) are the main concurrency in Germany on monitor or very neutral speakers. So it's also logic that they come to the table. They have competed for decenia to be the monitor of choice in Germany, both with their strengths and weaknesses.

I think the D&D, Neumann and Geitham all have heir place, and each does somethig good and something less good (bad is not the right word). So what fits you depends on your case.
 
Sure, some of the models by these companies can be considered alongside each other, but an 8C is not really an alternative to an 901 :)
 
Sure, some of the models by these companies can be considered alongside each other, but an 8C is not really an alternative to an 901 :)
Why not?
 
yeah the 8c may not play as loud or go as deep but they have multiple bass drivers, cardioid, and are one of the best measuring speakers out there. The amp pack is easily serviceable by the user and light to ship. In terms of innovation they beat Geithain by a mile. About the same price too. AsciLab is a somewhat similar design and look to be great measuring. I see no harm in throwing out other options. Many times if I’m looking for a product someone mentioning something I don’t know about might spark my search in a new direction.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MKR
Sure, some of the models by these companies can be considered alongside each other, but an 8C is not really an alternative to an 901 :)
I was hoping to compare 8Cs against the 901 but was only able to directly compare here the 944k to the 8Cs.
The D&Ds are much better in every respect, unless MEG change their whole sales model I don’t ever envisage myself being able to stock them.
Just checking the 901s specs bass extension between the two is similar 24/25 Hz.
Keith
 
The differences between the speakers was veryyy audible to me. It is true the listening conditions were not ideal. In fact the neumann were closer together than the geithain so i had to move in the room to compare. Def not ideal. Anytime speakers aren’t in a free standing space issues happen, unfortunately creating these conditions for a perfect demo is difficult without spending a ton of money.

When i started this post i was advised to listen to these speakers because construction, materials ect. Have huge impact on sound.
I am eager to learn more on how the graphs provided in this forum correlate to audible perceived differences.

But to comment on neumann vs geithainn.
I felt sbir did have an effect on this listening experience. And it would likely have an affect in my own studio!(I’ve read the only way to overcome sbir in a meaningful way is soffit mounting, which in itself is expensive!)*i read this when doing some reading through the master handbook of acoustics

But also the overall impression of the speaker. I hear a lot of the “euphonic tuning” of the geithainn, the “natural presentation”. These things become pointed out when compared to a speaker like the neumann. More flat, more “speaker” sounding.
I could easily learn how to mix on the neumann and find great results. But i feel i would still be compensating for the imho less favorable “tone” of the speaker.
On top of this there was the what i found to be a haze or distortion in neumann that i can’t quite put my finger on… maybe an interaction between the drivers. Maybe the fact that they aren’t coaxial… maybeee sbir… not sure! This was confirmed though when my gf’s untrained ear picked up the difference right away.

But when i listened on Geithainn, like i said in previous posts, i was not only hearing the fundamental of the kick and bass but also in a very clear way the individual harmonics poking out. I could hear the beater of the kick and what material was used. I could hear the very gentle sub freq produced when the strings of a guitar were plucked. It was as if i was brought into the room the recording was made in. My experience with neumann was i was still listening to a loudspeaker. A very accurate loudspeaker! But a loud speaker. I have yamahas and aurtone for this. I want mains to give me more.

I understand geithain. Is out of reach for a lot of people (for many reasons) and that is likely why they aren’t more popular.

But my first question in my journey was, “should i look at measurements and accept great measurements for what they are without first demoing the speaker” that is why i was greatly considering the KH420 in my original post! If anything i had a confirmation bias toward these, as they are easier on my pocket!
The overwhelming response was LISTEN FIRST!! Same response in gearspace.
So i travel across the world to hear these speakers for myself.
My second question became between the speakers in this price point, which one do i like the most/ will be the most useful to me.
After comparing side by side, i came to these conclusions.

I really do hope we can get third party measurements on the Geithainn.
I also wish they were more available to the world.
But when i heard them i knew they were what i was looking for. Even compared to speakers in a higher price bracket. For me the RL901K checked every box and then some.

Huge sweet spot? ( and i mean kind of unbelievable likely do to coaxial) check
Low distortion figures that make the speaker feel effortless and natural? Check
A cardioid response down super low? Check
And all this WITHOUT DSP…
Is it the world’s best speaker? I don’t know…
Still haven’t heard the Genelec 8381A ;-)

I too believe in diminishing returns, to the everyday listener maybe the difference isn’t great enough to justify such a price gap. Imho, when you go from 80% to 95% something special happens… a sort of magic feeling happens. It is like getting a great croissant and enjoying it. Food is food, but when you go to france and eat a croissant made by the hand of a master who has dedicated their life to making something perfect, it translates to me, in an emotional way.
The little details add up… and why settle when these will be with me for the next 10-20 years?
Not to say i NEED this in anyway, but to me, in my very specific situation. I feel it is a great option!
@drdredd @Waxx : Of course it is very important to compare "apples to apples".

I assume the Geithain vs K+H listening experience as reported by Waxx was based on an optimized installation (incl. EQ?) for both speakers while the listening experience as reported by Drdredd used the non-EQ'd speakers just "thrown into the room".

What I still do not understand is to which extent a monopole loudspeaker can be optimized by appropriate room EQ below Schroeder to perform as well as a cardioid loudspeaker. Peaks surely can be very effectively mitigated by EQ, large dips, however, may not be filled by EQ (I usually add max +3dB to broad dips only). But what about time domain? Does SBIR in upper bass/lower mids - even EQ'd to comparable frequency responses - damage the signal in time domain (imaging accuracy, clarity)?

I personally do not care to invest a lot of time in measuring and EQing my speakers, as this is a one time effort...
 
Because it sounds like a toy speaker (not a direct comparison but within a short time frame nevertheless)
OK, we have very interesting - very different - opinions floating around.

My lesson learned: I definitely have to listen for myself :)
 
@drdredd @Waxx : Of course it is very important to compare "apples to apples".

I assume the Geithain vs K+H listening experience as reported by Waxx was based on an optimized installation (incl. EQ?) for both speakers while the listening experience as reported by Drdredd used the non-EQ'd speakers just "thrown into the room".

What I still do not understand is to which extent a monopole loudspeaker can be optimized by appropriate room EQ below Schroeder to perform as well as a cardioid loudspeaker. Peaks surely can be very effectively mitigated by EQ, large dips, however, may not be filled by EQ (I usually add max +3dB to broad dips only). But what about time domain? Does SBIR in upper bass/lower mids - even EQ'd to comparable frequency responses - damage the signal in time domain (imaging accuracy, clarity)?

I personally do not care to invest a lot of time in measuring and EQing my speakers, as this is a one time effort...
I don't know the details, but that was an mastering engineer with a long history of mastering Belgian and French pop and folkmusic, and his room looked and sounded well treated and installed the oldskool (analog) way. He is now retired over a decade, but still got his gear (even the vinyl lathe) and uses the room now for music listening he says. But he does not do mastering or mixing anymore as his health is not that good anymore (he is in his late 70's) So i won't mention his name as he don't want to be bothered anymore. I know him as I was mixing a lot of live concerts on air (live radio broadcasts) of folk bands at that time, and I was recommended to him by one of the bands as the "guy who fix anything" (which i wasn't, but i can fix things) and speaks french (as the guy only speaks french and a bit german).
 
Congratulations for your decision - which wood / color did you chose? :D the woodcabinets are just that great looking craftmanship...
 
Can’t recommend this enough! Really the only way if you want to know
I did this with my last purchase (Neumann KH310), and frankly, the listening conditions at the dealer (JustMusic in Hamburg) at that time were so bad that I would not have purchased these speakers (any speakers) based on my listening experience back then. My decision was indeed mainly based on the positive test by Sound & Recording, and thank god I did not regret it.

Today I would want to hear the speakers at my own location, and with basic room EQ applied for the bass region. This would require me to order several "candidates" and keep only the "winner".

Is anybody aware of Geithain/Dutch&Dutch/Neumann/Genelec dealers in Germany supporting such an approach? For a private customer buying only one pair of speakers?

It remains difficult I fear...
 
Congratulations for your decision - which wood / color did you chose? :D the woodcabinets are just that great looking craftmanship...
Satin walnut natural… changed my mind a couple times but that finish looked so dynamic and beautiful to me!
 
For example, I like the way the carpenter made the edges of the boxes. They are made from solid wood...

View attachment 390259


Well, I still had my ATC SCM 11 when I got my Geithain speakers, and the veneer work on the ATC wasn't that good. However, the veneer work does not impact the sound of course. The cardioid design is quite impressive. When stepping behind the speakers there is practically no bass....

View attachment 390261

https://www.me-geithain.de/en/rl-901k2.html
Just curious, what veneer is this 901K in?
 
Back
Top Bottom