• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Gear evoking emotion

I think what you have to be very careful with here is the type of mistake many audiophiles and audio reviewers make, which is to impute your own reaction to the equipment itself.

It’s clear you had an emotional reaction. I get that because I experience that. But it’s generally a mistake to attribute the “ emotion, producing quality” as if it’s some intrinsic quality of the gear. The emotion is coming from you not the gear. Some other audiophile may hear what you heard and think it was offputting and have no emotional connection. So it’s in the individual not the piece of gear.

Making this type of mistake is how many people have gone down the wrong rabbit hole I’m trying to figure out “ why isn’t digital musical!”
And you get people going into bogus pseudoscientific explanations for “ why digital can’t sound satisfying and natural.” While completely ignoring that most listeners find it entirely musically satisfying.

As to why you had your particular emotional reaction to that vinyl set up, that’s hard to say. It could be any combination of factors from actually hearing particular new sound that you liked, to some other bias factors going on that you weren’t aware of.

Having said all that, I certainly understand having emotional reactions to music played on equipment, but not others. And I should say that this is when I am in more audiophile mode than strict “ music listening mode.” Which means I am paying attention to the system’s way of portraying the music.

I can sit in front of some very expensive systems and not feel a thing musically. And then I can sit in front of other systems or even some cheaper systems that are doing “ something” that I find more engaging and then I will have a hard time getting my butt off the seat because I just wanna keep listening and listening. Sounds like you had one of those experiences.

As it happens I also have those type of experiences playing vinyl on my system… having gone down the rabbit hole of buying a “ high-end” turntable you can see HERE

And I also find my tube amps you can see in
THIS PHOTO also seem to connect me to the music through my system. More than other amplifiers I’ve used.

The thing is, it’s hard to know for sure what proportion might be a personal bias effect versus the actual sound. It could be all bias effect or some mix. And these cases an individual can decide for himself how much that matters or not.

As some have pointed out, this type of thing can send you off down rabbit holes, or on a wild goose chase, where you are chasing some emotional connection in gear which may be hard to pin down because so much of it is just coming from yourself. And that’s one reason why it’s good to listen to many of the folks here, if you are making a mistake in ascribing it to some objective technical factors in the gear.

On the other hand, if you just find yourself swooning when you use a certain type of gear that doesn’t happen for others, even if you don’t figure out exactly why, if it’s a reliable experience, then you may just say
“ whatever is going on, it’s worth it for me to buy this gear.”

I’m incredibly happy with my system, I don’t necessarily need to have figured out every single aspect as to why it affects me as it does but it effortlessly engages me. But you’ll find the same for other people who went down other routes, such as the one you may find people advising you on here.

Nothing wrong with getting into vinyl though :cool:
Yes, you have a good point. Two things apart from good electronics that might have invoked the feeling:

1. It was a great song I had never heard before.
2. Before when listening to the digital system I was in "analyzing mode" looking for the next buy. When he switched to vinyl, which I wasn´t really interested in, I might have realxed more and just listened without analyzing.

These two factors combined with a good system might have invoked this experience. I will certainly be careful not to go to deep down the rabbit hole.
 
Late to this thread, but will repeat what others have said:

Your reaction to the vinyl version could have been:

  • Due to a different master
  • Due to harmonic or dynamic distortion on the TT, or feedback
  • Due to different volume levels
  • Due to some kind of cognitivie bias
The least likely explanation is that the gear itself did something interesting to the sound.

Also concur with the rest that getting some subs and room correction in your setup will do a lot. It's night and day most of the time.
 
So, this is going to be quite a long post because I want to give as much details as possible before I get feedback because I would really love to hear different theories about an experience I had recently that made me question measurements. Or at least to some extent. I want to figure out what I experienced.

I have been an avid believer of measurements, basically because it makes sense. I have a decent hifi setup consisting of a pair of DIY Troels Gravendsen Revelator 851 speakers that are really good. Well balanced, very transparent etc. Probably would cost 20k-30k if they were a commercial product. I use an Audiophonics HPA-S400ET Purifi class D power amp paired with an Accuphase C-2150 preamp. At the time of this event I had a Vincent DAC-1MK and a MiniDSP Studio with Volumio as source. This system sounded quite good. Good soundstage, great details and separation of instruments etc, but I always felt something was missing. I did not feel moved emotionally by the music the way I would have liked to.

So I went to a dealer here in northern Sweden that had a decent listening room and asked him to show me some good products and to discuss with me what I could do as my next step. I made clear to him that I was not interested in vinyl since it is too inconvenient. Also I do have a decent vinyl setup at home (Rega P6 turntable, ClearAudio MC pickup and EAR 834P RIIA with Lundhal step up transformers) that I bought because I had a romanticized idea based on childhood memories. I quickly realized that it did not sound any better than my digital setup and was mostly a hassle and had all the clicks and pops that comes with vinyl so I stopped using it pretty much completely after a while.

The dealer played some music on his system and it sounded good, but not better than what I had at home already. His system consisted of a pair of Hörning Eufrodite speakers (that cost 27k and I think my speakers sound somewhat better to be honest), a TEAC AP-701 power amp (NCore class d, 35k), TEAC UD-701N preamp with built in DAC (41k) and a Lindemann Limetree streamer (9k). Prices are for the Swedish market so might vary, but you get the idea.

After a couple of hours of talking and listening the dealer told me that now when I had listened to my digital stuff he wanted to show me what he likes about hifi and put on a LP on his vinyl setup going through the same preamp, power amp and speakers. I had no idea at that time what the components in the vinyl setup cost and as I said my bias was strongly against vinyl. But from the first note of music my jaw dropped. I had never heard music move me emotionally in that way. I was completely stunned. It sounded so beautiful. It did not sound any more detailed, or had a better soundstage or anything like that but somehow the music went straight to the heart. It was hard to pinpoint the difference soundwise, but it was so much more emotional. I got goosebumps and it just sounded amazing.

I asked him to put on the same song digitally (Qobus) and while it sounded good, it was a night and day difference emotionally. I did not do a blind test (no point since the pops and clicks from the LP would have spoiled it anyway) nor did I do any volume matching, but changing volume made no difference. The emotion was there no matter the volume, and the difference compared to the digital version was not subtle, it was night and day.

After I came back home I could not stop thinking about this. That emotion I had experienced was the missing piece, it was what I had been looking for. In my amazement I forgot to ask the dealer what gear he had used so I emailed him the day after and asked. It turned out to be pretty expensive top notch gear. Gold Notes top turntable Mediterraneo X (12k), with Gold Note Machiavelli Gold pickup (3.6k) and a Gold Note PH-1000 Lite phono stage (7.2k). Very expensive stuff it turned out, but it certainly sounded better than anything I had heard.

This experience turned everything I thought I knew about Hifi upside down. A format that measures worse than digital blew digital out of its socks completely.

The interesting thing here is that this source went through the same preamp and NCore class D power amp from TEAC so this tells me that a good measuring class D amp like NCore, Purifi etc, can pass through the emotion I am looking for. Many audiophiles despise class d but for me this proved that good class d is very good indeed. So what is going on here from a technical point of view? This really messes with my mind trying to understand what I experienced and I want to hear what you guys think. I don´t believe in some hifi magic so there must be an explanation to this.

I know some of you will say that I didn´t blind test or volume match and think the case is closed because of that. So be it, but it certainly is not a closed case for me. The difference was so big that it just blew my mind. So for the sake of argument, let's assume there was a noticeable difference in favor of the vinyl setup, what could be the cause of that difference?

I really don't think it has anything to do with digital being inferior. Perhaps some of you are familiar with the MoFi scandal? Analog purists for decades happily went to MoFi for analog audiophile LP recordings but then it leaked that they use digital DSD processing before pressing and the purists are in shambles.

My first thought was that perhaps the streaming services are not as lossless as they claim. So I bought a digital lossless copy of the album. It was the album “Thank God we left the garden” by Jeffrey Martin by the way. The song we listened to was “Red Station Wagon”. It did not convey the same emotion in my system at least, even though I used a lossless file. It is possible that it is my system or room that is the problem and that it might have sounded better in the dealers room.

My second idea was loudness wars. Some of you might know that there was a huge problem in the 90s and early 2000s that studios made albums “hotter” by increasing loudness so that their songs would stand out as louder on radio and CD than the competition. This process meant heavy compressing, killing the life and dynamics of the music, especially noticeable on a good system. LP often had a different master since LP was never part of the loudness wars and could sound much better than the digital version because of this. Even though this problem is not as common any more since there were reactions after some time and when streaming became popular the streaming services normalized the volume anyway and it became pointless. However some digital masters are still worse than their analog counterparts. I checked the dynamic range on the digital album I bought (I uploaded it here: https://dr.loudness-war.info/album/view/212351) but it looks quite ok. I do not know what the dynamic range is on the LP version though. But I suspect this might not be the reason why the LP sounded so much better, but it is possible that it could be.

My third idea was the inter-sample issue that many DACs have. A problem that is rarely measured but can cause a lot of distortion. The problem is still quite common and it is discussed here for anyone who are interested:

I don´t know if the TEAC Dac had this issue or not, but I do know that I do not have that issue in my system since MiniDSP fixed that problem in their products in 2023. If this was the problem why doesn't the song sound as emotional in my system?

One possibility could be that the dealer's DAC had this problem and even though my system does not, I might have other problems holding the sound quality back in my system. I do know that I have some room issues. I have my system in my living room so there is a lot of furniture and stuff and very little room treatment. I only use Dirac to correct things but Dirac cannot solve a dip in the bass of almost 10db (which I have).

A fourth possibility is that the measurements are missing something. It is not impossible since the inter-sample issue went under the radar for a long time and still does. I do not think Amir measures it either, so what else could we be missing in measurments?
Perhaps good capacitors, resistors, linear power supplies, clean power, cables etc do make some difference that we can hear (as many audiophiles claim) but we don't measure it properly? This experience with the dealer's analog system certainly has made me reconsider some of the claims made in the audiophile world but there might be a simpler explanation too that I am missing.

A long post I know, but what do you think? I really want to go to the bottom of this and understand what I experienced. I kindly ask for a civilized and open discussion. I am a science oriented guy, but in my world science must always be open to the idea that there are more things to learn and discover otherwise it's not really science.
A couple of points.

1. You obviously genuinely liked what you heard at the dealer. No point arguing that.
2. Measurements are not very good at predicting what you will subjectively prefer. They are not done because of that. Their significance is in showing how the equipment changes the signal. People then like what they like. There does not have to be any great mystery wrt our current measurements.
 
Last edited:
[…] Your reaction to the vinyl version could have been:
  • Due to a different master
  • Due to harmonic or dynamic distortion on the TT, or feedback
  • Due to different volume levels
  • Due to some kind of cognitive bias […]

To this list I would add that the visual and tactile experience of vinyl is part of the aural experience. The brain integrates information from different senses, therefore, seeing something visually (e.g. a record turning on the turntable as the needle
and cartridge travel along the grooves) can influence how we interpret what we hear, and vice versa. There is quite a bit of research on this. We live in our own virtual reality to take it a step further according to neuroscientist Thomas Metzinger ( author of The Ego Tunnel) and several others.
 
To this list I would add that the visual and tactile experience of vinyl is part of the aural experience. The brain integrates information from different senses, therefore, seeing something visually (e.g. a record turning on the turntable as the needle
and cartridge travel along the grooves) can influence how we interpret what we hear, and vice versa. There is quite a bit of research on this. We live in our own virtual reality to take it a step further according to neuroscientist Thomas Metzinger ( author of The Ego Tunnel) and several others.
Totally, I was implicitly lumping all of that stuff under "cognitive bias"... but I definitely agree, if you played someone the same digital file twice, but the second time told them it was the vinyl version and actually started playing the record, I am SURE a lot of people, maybe most would tell you it sounded way different.
 
Late to this thread, but will repeat what others have said:

Your reaction to the vinyl version could have been:

  • Due to a different master
  • Due to harmonic or dynamic distortion on the TT, or feedback
  • Due to different volume levels
  • Due to some kind of cognitivie bias
The least likely explanation is that the gear itself did something interesting to the sound.

Also concur with the rest that getting some subs and room correction in your setup will do a lot. It's night and day most of the time.
yep got to agree with the 3d cat , this post was brought to by 3d cat
51342.png
as for benchmark i'll consider when 2nd hand for less than £100 , if george lucas had mighty ultimate power in the professional THX universe that wasn't for sale and now they often show up on 2nd ebay for £100 or less and george lucas has more money than benchmark , we shall 2nd hand wait , why spend thousands when soon as you buy its lost most of its % price
 
I am more and more leaning towards that this experience pretty much was just a trick of my mind. After the experience with the dealers vinyl rig I bought a new (but used) DAC since my old one sounded thin and unnatural for some reason (don´t know how it measured but it was from Vincent) but the new one sounds great. Tone and timbre sounds real. The manufacturer offered me a deal to upgrade my DAC to a special edition version. I would send the old DAC in and I would get a new unused one but had to put some money in between, but still a good deal considering what the SE would cost if I bought it new. The price I paid for the used one plus the extra payment would still be considerably lower than what the SE cost new. The SE is the exact same DAC but with upgraded audiophile grade parts such as better caps and connectors. The manufacturer was kind enough to lend me the new DAC for a couple of weeks to evaluate before I decied to take the deal or not.

I had to volume match them simce there was an 0.8 db difference. First day listening I could hear no difference when switching back and forth (wich I could easily do since my MiniDSP SHD Studio has double outputs and also I can set different volumes for each output).

The second day I listened to the new DAC exclusively and the music sounded amazing. The music sounded so smooth and emotional, very much like the experience I had that day at the dealers shop with his vinyl rig. My thought was "Wow, DAC burn in must be a real thing, this sounds amazing. This is what I have been searching for!"

Third day I went back to A-B testing both DACs and could not for my life hear a difference and nor could I the rest of the trial days. The only reasonable explanation to the second days experience must be the mood I was in and bias. I already have a system that sounds great and just wanted to see if I could get a little more out of it whith this upgrade. Also, when I prior to the loan had asked the manufacturer what the difference of sound was between the two versions, he said that the SE sounded smoother. For me this was a clear proof of how unconscious bias and mood affects the experience. And I now see that it is likely that something similar might have happened when I had the vinyl revelation. For me, I think the case might be closed.
 
Last edited:
I am more and more leaning towards that this experience pretty much was just a trick of my mind. After the experience with the dealers vinyl rig I bought a new (but used) DAC since my old one sounded thin and unnatural for some reason (don´t know how it measured but it was from Vincent) but the new one sounds great. Tone and timbre sounds real. The manufacturer offered me a deal to upgrade my DAC to a special edition version. I would send the old DAC in and I would get a new unsued one but had to put some money in between, but still a good deal considering what the SE would cost if I bought it new. The price I paid for the used one plus the extra payment would still be considerably lower than what the SE cost new. The SE is the exact same DAC but with upgraded audiophile grade parts such as better caps and connectors. The manufacturer was kind enough to lend me the new DAC for a couple of weeks to evaluate before I decied to take the deal or not.

I had to volume match them simce there was a 0.8 db difference. First day listening I could hear no difference when switching back and forth (wich I could easily do since my MiniDSP SHD Studio has double outputs and also I can set different volumes for each output).

The second day I listened to the new DAC exclusively and the music sounded amazing. The music sounded so smooth and emotional, very much like the experience I had that day at the dealers shop with his vinyl rig. My thought was "Wow, DAC burn in must be a real thing, this sounds amazing. This is what I have been searching for!"

Third day I went back to A-B testing both DACs and could not for my life hear a difference and nor could I the rest of the trial days. The only reasonable explanation to the second days experience must be the mood I was in and bias. I already have a system that sounds great and just wanted to see if I could get a little more out of it whith this upgrade. Also, when I prior to the loan had asked the manufacturer what the difference of sound was between the two versions was he said that the SE sounded smoother. For me this was a clear proof of how unconscious bias and mood affects the experience. And I now see that it is likely that something similar might have happened when I had the vinyl revelation. For me, I think the case might be closed.
I give you a lot of credit for being willing to interrogate what you hear and whether it's due to the gear, and if so, how, or whether it's "just" in your mind.

I use the scare quotes because for whatever reason some people seem very reluctant to acknowledge that our ear/brain combination "edits" the sound in various ways, and that our ears aren't objective measuring devices like microphones strapped to our heads.

This is a big step... consider the fact that whole audio reviewing (or snake-oil peddling) careers are built on a failure to acknowledge that sometimes your brain influences what you hear. :)
 
[..]T his is a big step... consider the fact that whole audio reviewing (or snake-oil peddling) careers are built on a failure to acknowledge that sometimes your brain influences what you hear. :)
Replace sometimes by always. It 's impossible to remove the brain influence from the process.
 
Replace sometimes by always. It 's impossible to remove the brain influence from the process.
Oh, good point. I mean, as I said in another thread, even perceiving music as music and not just random noises is proof that your brain is totally in control of what you hear. Most animals and some people don't hear music, they hear noises of no special significance.

We have a whole hobby centered around listening to these special noises, which are only special by virtue of our brain "editing" what we hear. But sure, that cognitive influence on hearing stops immediately the second we start to evaluate subtle aspects of sound quality. :p
 
[..] We have a whole hobby centered around listening to these special noises, which are only special by virtue of our brain "editing" what we hear.
I don't think it's the editing. Music follows rules and patterns, and somehow it creates joy when the brain detects them.
 
Music follows rules and patterns, and somehow it creates joy when the brain detects them.
Sound that follows rules and patterns for timing and frequency create special perceptual responses in our brains, namely rhythm and pitch. If you ever lose the ability to hear music (it's called amusia) apparently it sounds very different. Oliver Saks describes going through an episode of it in his book Muiscophilia. It's hard to imagine, but the symphony sounded like random noises to him.

My point is just that our brains definitely run the show when it comes to perception of sound. If brains spell the difference between "music" and "noise", imagine how much else they're doing?
 
Yes, I am sure digital can sound just as emotional. The purpose of this post is to understand what makes gear transmit that emotion. In this particular digital setup it did not while the analog setup did and my question is why?
Music makes emotion, playback gear just gets in the way to a greater or lesser extent.
 
This thing has apparently evoked some emotion...

1734054862492.jpeg



;) :cool:
 
Back
Top Bottom