• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Fun with vinyl measurements

It should be nice to have an accurate calculation to refer to. Does drag+VTA have an impact on VTF or not? Yosh calculations says so, so do this VAM guy. First 50 min about vinyl:


He is correct about many cartridges having large VTAs, also that arm pivot point is a factor. But VTA? Drag is horizontal and should only decrease VTA somewhat but what about impact on VTF?
 
DIN has a VTA test record on that I get 21 on AT0C9 and 28 in on Shure V15-iv Jico SAS B, running VTA…
 
Last edited:
DIN has a VTA test record on that I get 21 on AT0C9 and 28 in on Shure V15-iv Jico SAS B, running VTA…
Yes. I and shimmed mine to get closer to nominal VTA. Question is if VTA afffects VTF dynamically. Or not.
 
If so… what are you going to do about it?
If VTF would impact at the level as Yosh formula, one should decrease static VTF. If not, keep it. So question is what is true.
 
image.jpg

don’t worry be happy,
 
Pretty good pink Noise track AnalogMagik V2 pink noise.. the best PN track I have seen so far. For other test I prefer V1 records since they are perfectly flat which minimises disturbances
IMG_6277.png
 
Last edited:
A short comparison using the KAB RF-1, cartridge is shimmed for VTA ≈ 22°, 1 kHz stereo signal from CA-TRS1007.

KAB RF-1 works fine below 100 Hz to reduce warp-related noise. However, it is a bit more noise around 150-300 Hz with the KAB. Since I use two subs in mono, the KAB is not effective when playing over my speakers, only when recording to digital and playing in other systems such as headphone. I will reduce some need for amplifier headroom though.



1 kHz CA-TRS1007 RF1.png
 
1 kHz stereo signal from CA-TRS1007
Technics 1200GR2 / Non-original headshell "No Name", weight 8.5 grams / Ortofon MC 5000
Pik (999Hz) -11.8 dB
Pik 10 Hz - 45.7 dB

The amplitude of the unwanted resonance (10 Hz) is 33.9 dB below the test signal.

Resorance.jpg
 

Attachments

  • Resorance.jpg
    Resorance.jpg
    196.3 KB · Views: 23
Last edited:
1 kHz stereo signal from CA-TRS1007
Technics 1200GR2 / Non-original headshell "No Name", weight 8.5 grams / Ortofon MC 5000
Pik (999Hz) -11.8 dB
Pik 10 Hz - 45.7 dB

The amplitude of the unwanted resonance (10 Hz) is 33.9 dB below the test signal.

View attachment 418849
10hz generated by what?
 
1 kHz stereo signal from CA-TRS1007
Technics 1200GR2 / Non-original headshell "No Name", weight 8.5 grams / Ortofon MC 5000
Pik (999Hz) -11.8 dB
Pik 10 Hz - 45.7 dB

The amplitude of the unwanted resonance (10 Hz) is 33.9 dB below the test signal.

View attachment 418849
If you drop the file in REWs RTA-window what do you get?
 
10hz generated by what?

Every turntable generates unwanted resonance in the range of up to 20 Hz.
The resonance peak can be at different frequencies, it depends on the combination of cartridge compliance - effective mass of the arm.
The smaller the amplitude of unwanted resonance the better.
The size of the amplitude of unwanted resonance depends on many variables......
 
Every turntable generates unwanted resonance in the range of up to 20 Hz.
The resonance peak can be at different frequencies, it depends on the combination of cartridge compliance - effective mass of the arm.
The smaller the amplitude of unwanted resonance the better.
The size of the amplitude of unwanted resonance depends on many variables......
but reading you..not a """resonance"""...
but then there can be elements in resonance with the present frequency... so manage the source... ;-)
 
1 kHz stereo signal from CA-TRS1007
Technics 1200GR2 / Non-original headshell "No Name", weight 8.5 grams / Ortofon MC 5000
Pik (999Hz) -11.8 dB
Pik 10 Hz - 45.7 dB

The amplitude of the unwanted resonance (10 Hz) is 33.9 dB below the test signal.

View attachment 418849
Please use REW, Audacity often fail to present frequency responses correctly
 
Back
Top Bottom