Well, for that paper. Haven't read a lot of what's out there, but it seems the latest changes were around 1971, but those are based on existing DIN and IEC.
I read somdwhere that 2Sigma is the new standard, DIN and JIS WRMS hide all the problems behind a smaller number. So 2S correlate much better with the actual speed variation/quality , se myposted plots..Better or just different? Is there some more info as to what 2-sigma correlates to vs the other methods? Technical performance or audibility?
Yes WRMS always give the smallest number, but then there is quasi-peak and unweighted RMS and unweighted peak (the two last give higher numbers than 2sigma, not sure about quasi-peak). The confusion is out there still since you often do not know what the manufacturer refers to. Are all the numbers of current turntables given as 2sigma? Or to old standards?I read somdwhere that 2Sigma is the new standard, DIN and JIS WRMS hide all the problems behind a smaller number. So 2S correlate much better with the actual speed variation/quality , se myposted plots..
Weighted values I suppose.Previous weren't to correlate to actual speed, rather perception.
2-sigma aes, from personal experience, remains discriminating at 0.0x% when the others are less so except to consider at 0.00x%...(which I would not agree with for my part)... but would be delighted to read the feedback on this subject...Better or just different? Is there some more info as to what 2-sigma correlates to vs the other methods? Technical performance or audibility?
Few use 2S since the value is larger…Yes WRMS always give the smallest number, but then there is quasi-peak and unweighted RMS and unweighted peak (the two last give higher numbers than 2sigma, not sure about quasi-peak). The confusion is out there still since you often do not know what the manufacturer refers to. Are all the numbers of current turntables given as 2sigma? Or to old standards?
there are the flattering numbers... and what are useful ..... ;-)Few use 2S since the value is larger…
And none of these numbers are seen in dynamic conditions.there are the flattering numbers... and what are useful ..... ;-)
www.audiosciencereview.com
Well this particular record just shows the effect more clearly, but all records and conventional tonearms have it, more or less. If it has a resonance, it has scrubbing and FM modulation in the resonance region that varies dynamically (independent of drive stability). The servo-controlled damping arms would be interesting.I don't have this disc and streaming or CD will be enough for me in this case... ;-)
(These standard wf mesureaments were very useful to me... allowed me to audibly improve a suspended belt... coming from a large dd, otherwise I would have had to put it in the attic... ;-) )
I accept the relative aspect of the "vinyl" measurements on principle .... and if I have already come across vinyls that pose problems, pressing etc. and that excite harmonic modes on the arm side, perhaps creating too many reading problems, I have put them aside ... overall over the years it has not bothered me so much as the evidence of problems with good old bad w&f ... after that I have certainly had over the years rather coherent turntables-arms-cartdrige that do not attract too much lightning ;-)Well this particular record just shows the effect more clearly, but all records and conventional tonearms have it, more or less. If it has a resonance, it has scrubbing and FM modulation in the resonance region that varies dynamically (independent of drive stability). The servo-controlled damping arms would be interesting.
Don't listen to records on FM!
I don’t mean FM radio, I mean FM as in Frequency Modulation Distortion (FMD, or pitch instability). FM occurs as a result of the stylus tip scrubbing along the groove during tonearm mass/compliance resonance or transient events. The amount of scrubbing depends on the amplitude of the resonance...www.diyaudio.com
interesting, especially since the gyro, in my memory, has a rather flexible suspension .... ;-)When you think you have leveled your Gyro. you have not. When the motor runs the belt drag increases and shifts the leveling
Sadly slow-motion does not work when file is uploaded
![]()
Making it perfect level accodring to this bubble level makes is worse, I think what I have now is good enough...it is at DD level...
View attachment 384578
![]()
Good way to approach vinyl (a format that comes with limitations)I think what I have now is good enough
That's a pretty standard rule of thumb for all the higher end AT MM's !that's what we all know here...this type of at justifies a really low cumulative capacitance ;-)
indeed...;-)That's a pretty standard rule of thumb for all the higher end AT MM's !