Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions.
Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!
I think the LP sounds as measured, a bit smeared cymbals. I think your single might be differently mastered or cut, dropping a bit at HF. The compilation LP track; it is the third track and not the first one as the original LP, and I believe they threw it in without any thoughts on tracing problems. Same level as CD on lateral, but going up on vertical. So the Shure does not trace it properly. I'll redo this on the original 1979 LP when it arrives.
I'd prefer a M2.5 hole, so the shim sides stay parallel with the cartridge. However, if you are trying to compensate for deviated cantilevers, you might also want slots.
I find that a hole is just fine so far, avoids shim displacing it-self, but in some headshells I can see that only hole may prevent cartridge placement at the very front or back
First try with the smaller shim 6 degree. Tried with the bigger oned on my 4 g arm and a Shure V15Vx also but they are visually quite big. Below is the v15v with my 7.5 g arm
They do. My friend is printing variants. From 0.5 degree and up with 4 holes. Can also be used as azimuth shims. Was thinking of also doing VTA shims with azimuth correction. +/- 0.5 degree
It makes the azimuth adjustable to any degree (up to the the height of the central ridge determine)...Very easy to adjust azimuth without replacing shim
It makes the azimuth adjustable to any degree (up to the the height of the central ridge determine)...Very easy to adjust azimuth without replacing shim
That’s one idea. Right now there are more shim variants than I can cope to test. I want to settle with a set that I can have for measurements eg 3-4-5-6-7 degree using lateral and vertical sine. It takes time to mount and align for each shim.
The most significant take away was using zero-crossings due to the lower frequency, but sinc interpolation instead of linear for the same reason. It's not that impressive once you know it.