if you have a mono track from start perhaps. Purpose is to look at either the in or out of phase signal in the recording. It should be appox the same using two different cartridges or a cartridge against a CD track. Best is to use two different cartridges since the source (LP) is the same.
Ok - I have a first set of results for the Nagaoka MP-700, to check whether it shows elevated vertical or lateral distortion.
Methods and materials
UK 1979 7"
The Police- Walking on the Moon (WOTM)
Technics SL-1210 +
MP-700 or
Clearaudio Maestro V1 > RME ADI 2/4 > Audacity > 24-96 Hz wav. 45 kHz R load and 210 pF C load (3ft BJC LC2).
WOTM, The Very Best of Sting and the Police,
Tidal "max" > Audacity > 24-96 Hz wav
WOTM, The Police - Every Step You Take -
The Singles, SACD > Foobar 2000 > 24-96 Hz wav
WOTM is famous for Stuart Copeland's cymbal work.
Loaded into Audacity, clips matched for duration and volume (RMS ± 0.05). I clipped the beginning (low volume) and end (digital versions had a different run out).
Here are the spectrograms :-
High and low passed at 400 Hz (rumble etc) and 19 kHz (12 dB drop below levels at 17 kHz), 48 dB per octave. Then divided the clip into 4 selections :-
You can see selection 1 < 2 ≈ 3 < 4 for high frequency content.
If the MP-700 has a problem with HF content, it should be most obvious in Selection 4.
Mixed L and R to mono for lateral content.
Mixed L and inverted R to mono for vertical content
Selections exported as 24-96 Hz wav files and shown in REW.
Results
First, the CD lateral content shows the expected Selection 1 (crimson) < 2 (orange) ≈ 3 (green) < 4 (blue) for high frequency content :-
Next are the lateral selections 1-4. CD (orange), MP-700 (green), Maestro (blue), Tidal (brown)
The MP-700 tracks </≈ to the CD compilation single version and rolls off from around 5 kHz. The Maestro has a steeper roll-off from around 3 kHz.
Next the verticals - we might anticipate Selection 4 to be the worst ...
Except at the 9 kHz anomaly, I can't see see the MP-700 performing badly on this metric against the digital files or the Maestro. It tracks a little better than the Maestro in the 4,500-9,000 Hz range.
Here's the Maestro. The contacts were evenly worn, but I didn't optimize the load and azimuth.
Limitations are that it's only one piece of music, a 7" single, which will be better than an LP. I should have matched the cartridge FR first. The digital files may have been remastered with a treble boost. Nevertheless, I can't see anything egregious compared with the digital releases. The 9 kHz anomaly is certainly there.