Balle Clorin
Major Contributor
- Joined
- Dec 26, 2017
- Messages
- 2,441
- Likes
- 2,214
And by modifying your antiskating?this is is not too far away @Thomas_A range 0 sec is 126mm radius and 68mm at 900 sec ,,,
The phase method you proposedseems to work in the last script
View attachment 489641
View attachment 489640
But difference in distortion in both channels. Have to make recording of system as it is today
View attachment 489642
There are no good or bad antiskating settings... my question is simply to find out if modifying it here impacts the distortion offset along the entire path between the two channels... which might explain the noticeable offset...My antiskating is good, and tracking good, but I will do more checks. It sure how the azimuth was at these runs
You’ve since changed your mind? https://www.whatsbestforum.com/threads/another-series-of-mat-clamp-comparisons.41518/post-1089068@JP , you are right. Temperature effect on cartridge frequency response. AT 95E headshell temperature. I think It is safe to conclude that the variation I saw in 95E response was due to the older recordings I compared with was at a higher temperature. 3C does actually make a difference
View attachment 482338
here with measured room temerature..
View attachment 482339
Found on Josh pages..
View attachment 482340
I have a test with max and minimum AS setting ,, will dig it out , but from memory It did not change muchThere are no good or bad antiskating settings... my question is simply to find out if modifying it here impacts the distortion offset along the entire path between the two channels... which might explain the noticeable offset...
On the same test precisely?I have a test with max and minimum AS setting ,, will dig it out , but from memory It did not change much
I’m not able to follow that. The plot still looks nothing like what I’d expect for a mat. You haven’t repeated the experiment with better environmental controls?I noticed that when I tid the swap to Sorbothane the temperature was significantly different from the earlier test with original mat. Regretfully I did not retest the original mat the same cold morning as I put on The Sorbothane.. Then I suspected a temperature change could explain things and heated the room to 29c …
Still learning by trial and error here
I guess I’m just confused as the post on the other forum read as a statement a fact that the totality of the change was due to the mat. As previously mentioned it’s extremely doubtful any of that change is due to the mat.What I have to do is to rip off the sorbothane mat and revert to the original mat at 22C. Not prepared to do that yet, the sorbothane stick to the platter as glue and takes the paint with it too.
The effect you see partly a temperature effect I think
And by modifying your antiskating?
Perhaps it's simply not explained clearly that a 3k150 range is dedicated solely to w&f...., and perhaps it's just not properly prepared, unsuitable for distortion measurements... This needs to be verified on other setups...View attachment 489906
View attachment 489907
Antiskate on or off makes no difference in distortion this case CA Trackability record 15 minutes 3150Hz track from 126-68 mm radius
But channel phase difference lower without antiskate
I have e-mailed Alexey Korf before - on the RMS for that Sperling Test record, and asked again this week - unfortunately he has not come back with an answer. I do follow his Blog, and he does respond if you send him an e-mail - very nice fellow and he is on the Galibier website now - with the arms. Which is pretty awesome.Cannot see why a 3150 mono should be un suitable . Korf blog did the same as me this week on a full side 1khz track and could not see any Løfgren shaped distortion either. Maybe the effekt of shorter wavelength at smaller radius dominates?
galibierdesign.com
Cannot see why a 3150 mono should be un suitable . Korf blog did the same as me this week on a full side 1khz track and could not see any Løfgren shaped distortion either. Maybe the effekt of shorter wavelength at smaller radius dominates?