• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

FTC Power Amplifier Rule

Dennis Murphy

Major Contributor
Technical Expert
Joined
Mar 17, 2020
Messages
1,071
Likes
4,535
The Federal Trade Commission will be publishing a Notice of Proposed Rulemaking in the Federal Register in a day or two. The Notice will seek comment on proposed amendments to the Rule that may affect how power ratings for multichannel receivers must be measured. Currently, such AVR's need only publish power and distortion specs for 2-channel operation. The new Rulemaking will revisit this issue. The press release concerning the upcoming Federal Register Notice is pretty foggy except for the recommendation that THD must be lower than .1% at the rated power. That will prove controversial to say the least. Currently there is no cap on distortion--you just have to disclose what it is. Here's the press release, which asks for comments on:
  • "whether the Commission should amend the Rule to simplify power output measures by standardizing the test parameters used by amplifier sellers as follows: a load impedance of 8 ohms, a power band of 20 Hz to 20 kHz, and a THD limit of less than 0.1%; and
  • the parameters of consumers’ normal use of multichannel home theater amplifiers."
I have no idea what they mean by "the parameters of ...normal use..." But we'll know shortly. I'll post a link to the Federal Register Notice when it's published.
 

mhardy6647

Grand Contributor
Joined
Dec 12, 2019
Messages
11,217
Likes
24,181
I'm guessing that "the parameters of consumers' normal use" means that there's no expectation for all 11 or 13 or whatever channels to be capable of delivering their full continuous rated power all at the same time(?).

And I am darned glad to see that the FTC know how to use an apostrophe correctly for plural possessive. :)

As to the 0.1% I mean, it's OK (hifi reproduction was long considered to be better than 1% THD) -- although I personally am fine with 'publish the specs one's product can reliably meet', such as this vintage Lafayette 4-channel receiver. Not great, but it seems honest, which ought to count for something.

1657289953175.png

source:
 

sarumbear

Master Contributor
Forum Donor
Joined
Aug 15, 2020
Messages
7,604
Likes
7,314
Location
UK
@AdamG247 may I suggest merging other threads with the same topic? Thank you.
 

DVDdoug

Major Contributor
Joined
May 27, 2021
Messages
2,920
Likes
3,832
The manufacturers don't seem to be following the current rules so I still won't trust the published specs. :( They follow the specified format but when independently tested, it seems like they rarely make the rated power.

And, I'm assuming that's just an example for the format. It probably doesn't have to be 0.1%, 20-20kHz, and 8 Ohms as long as those details are included.
 
OP
D

Dennis Murphy

Major Contributor
Technical Expert
Joined
Mar 17, 2020
Messages
1,071
Likes
4,535
The manufacturers don't seem to be following the current rules so I still won't trust the published specs. :( They follow the specified format but when independently tested, it seems like they rarely make the rated power.

And, I'm assuming that's just an example for the format. It probably doesn't have to be 0.1%, 20-20kHz, and 8 Ohms as long as those details are included.
Actually, it's worse than that. It's often difficult to find a power spec with the required format even for 2-channel operation.
 

Katji

Major Contributor
Joined
Sep 26, 2017
Messages
2,990
Likes
2,273
They're is always hope? ;)
:) I noticed only one in about 100 of them had one of those mistakes, Quite unusual with memes.
I spent about 10 times longer than I thought I would. From "the Arch" to Stephen Hawking, Anne Frank, Kierkegard...
One referred to faith as well, that gave pause for thought.
 

MakeMineVinyl

Major Contributor
Joined
Jun 5, 2020
Messages
3,558
Likes
5,871
Location
Santa Fe, NM
This thread already exists HERE.
 
OP
D

Dennis Murphy

Major Contributor
Technical Expert
Joined
Mar 17, 2020
Messages
1,071
Likes
4,535
The Federal Register Notice concerning the proposed amendments to the FTC Rule has finally been published:
Federal Register :: Request Access

The main issue with the stereo testing requirements will be the .01 limit on THD. As excepted, the FTC is still punting on specific proposals for testing multichannel amps. The Notice reports some of the suggestions made in the last comment period, and then states that the authors presented no evidence that the proposed testing requirements represent common consumer usage (e.g., specifying that the surround channels should be run simultaneously at some reduced percentage of rated power for the mains, or that all channels should be run at full rated power simultaneously. So the ball hasn't been advanced on the most critical issue. Public comments are due by September 26.
 

DonH56

Master Contributor
Technical Expert
Forum Donor
Joined
Mar 15, 2016
Messages
7,835
Likes
16,497
Location
Monument, CO
How are we supposed to define and prove "common consumer usage"? AFAIK, Dolby makes no exceptions for surrounds and rears with respect to frequency and SPL limitations... And are they completely punting on any multichannel ratings (can't access from work, sorry)?
 
Top Bottom