A main-in connection isn’t required for a setup like that; the Ultra can be connected to any of the standard inputs on the Yamaha while in variable output mode. The Yamaha volume knob would be left at a high level and volume adjustments made via the Ultra (similar to the way many people are using the Fosi V3 Stereo or ZA3 as power amps).If you run the Ultra as a fixed output device, then it has no advantage over a pro plus, and you can't run the ultra as the master pre-amp into the Yamaha as it doesn't have a pre-out / main in capability.
The thermal paste used by Fosi Audio for the V3 mono's cooling seems to be a very cheap variant because several of my (new) amps were already "poluted" what seems to be probably silicon oil (?). The remains of that paste looked quite "wet" to me, which would support my observations. Therefore I removed the original paste and substituted it using my own variant, which I use for my PCs CPU cooler. The temperature measured (contactfree) before and afterwards did not deviate much and the amps seem to be functioning OK.I have done this, but I only measured the outside case temperature. You can see my previous post to see the temperatures before adding paste.
The short version is that adding paste made no difference in the external temp of the case. This may not be intuitive to everyone, but there's a good chance the chip is running cooler even though the case temp is unchanged. Average external case temp, under steady state conditions, is directly related to energy the chip is dissipating and not the temperature of the chip itself. In a situation where the conduction is poor, the chip will run hotter to "force" the energy through the higher thermal resistance interface. When the conduction is good, the chip will run cooler since is "easy" for the heat to transfer to the case. In either situation, the amount of energy is transferred to the case is identical so its temperature remains the same (again all things being equal). If the room temp changes or you add a fan, then the case temperature will change since its thermal resistance has changed to transferring heat away from itself. In steady state, the chip will run a constant temperature above the case. Improving the thermal interface (adding paste) will reduce this delta.
Having said all of that, I'm not convinced adding paste is needed. I did it since I was opening them up for my own entertainment. For people who don't want to open their units, just use a 2mm hex to insure the two bottom heatsink screws are moderately tight and enjoy using the amp.
It’s cheap crap. I never would’ve applied such junk on my CPU in my overclocking youth days.The thermal paste used by Fosi Audio for the V3 mono's cooling seems to be a very cheap variant because several of my (new) amps were already "poluted" what seems to be probably silicon oil (?). The remains of that paste looked quite "wet" to me, which would support my observations. Therefore I removed the original paste and substituted it using my own variant, which I use for my PCs CPU cooler. The temperature measured (contactfree) before and afterwards did not deviate much and the amps seem to be functioning OK.
Hmm I hadn't thought of doing it that way. I could still run the sub out of the Ultra and do full RC. Plus the Yamaha has a million inputs as a fall back.A main-in connection isn’t required for a setup like that; the Ultra can be connected to any of the standard inputs on the Yamaha while in variable output mode. The Yamaha volume knob would be left at a high level and volume adjustments made via the Ultra (similar to the way many people are using the Fosi V3 Stereo or ZA3 as power amps).
Your setup now is more compact and you’ve eliminated redundant components, but the 501 could’ve been repurposed for that role.
Yes indeed, that was just a solution for a single pair of speakers.I don't think that is going to work. Whatever the polarity of the amp (normal or inverted), you are putting the speakers out of phase with respect to each other. It will only cause a destruction of the sound - especially bass.
Both out of phase sounds fine if not playing with another speaker that is not out of phase.
The only reliable way to measure for this is to look at the waveform of the input compared with the output using an oscilloscope or similar
If you removed the V3 mono PCB from its case, one has to reapply thermal paste afterwards. What did You use ???It’s cheap crap. I never would’ve applied such junk on my CPU in my overclocking youth days.
-Ed
ARCTIC MX-4If you removed the V3 mono PCB from its case, one has to reapply thermal paste afterwards. What did You use ???
Have you ever opened one of these things? There are two threaded fasteners (a.k.a. screws) that ensure tight adherence of the heat spreader and the case.Here is the problem with the Fosi thermal design. There is no mechanical control of the contact surfaces between the heat spreader and the amplifier case. Good contact is essential for good heat transfer. If you look at CPU coolers, they are pressed firmly against the CPU (contact pressure control). Good implementations also require machined (or if you are really fussy, precision ground and polished) surfaces to specific flatness and surface roughness specs.
Below picture is from Archimago's review showing how the PCB is mounted to the case. No attention is paid to the mechanical contact between amp chip heat spreader and the case. With this Fosi design, the effectiveness of heat transfer from the chip to the case is all over the place.
View attachment 388972![]()
Part I: Fosi Audio V3 Mono Amp; Class D + PFFB, TI TPA3255 - Retail box with single 48V/10A power supply and filter. [With initial measurements.]
A blog for audiophiles about more objective topics. Measurements of audio gear. Reasonable, realistic, no snakeoil assessment of sound, and equipment.archimago.blogspot.com
DohHave you ever opened one of these things? There are two threaded fasteners (a.k.a. screws) that ensure tight adherence of the heat spreader and the case.
Coincidentally someone in the Ultra thread posted about using their integrated amp as if it were a power amp with the Ultra in variable output mode just this morning: postHmm I hadn't thought of doing it that way. I could still run the sub out of the Ultra and do full RC.
Oh well, every day is a school day. It's obvious when you think about it, all my yamaha is doing is operating as an most infinitely variable gain power amp, so I can mess about with the volume ranges on both devices (the Ultra jumps in steps of 3 using the remote which is too crude for my taste).Coincidentally someone in the Ultra thread posted about using their integrated amp as if it were a power amp with the Ultra in variable output mode just this morning: post
Unlikely to work due to the inevitable delays between audacity - and the output in analogue form. Probably longer than a full cycle at 20Hz.I had an idea earlier today about trying something like Audacity to visually inspect a phase wave during play while comparing it live with an oscilloscope directly on the terminals, something slow and low Hz going so I can see clearly if it's reversed vs its input. I considered it interesting enough to try out at least.
Thanks so much, I’d completely overlooked that! It also coincides with my estimate. In the EU I thought all standby settings had to be 0.5 watts or lowerit’s captured in the first post of this thread.
UPDATE: It seems that setting the gain of my Fosi V3 Monos to 25db instead of 31 makes them not turn on at random as they did before. At least they no longer do after having switched the gain settings on them. Still hooked up to my WiiM ULTRA.