• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

FOSI S3 Balanced Streamer Review

Rate this streamer

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 2 0.9%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 17 7.8%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 85 39.2%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 113 52.1%

  • Total voters
    217
No...
if for comparaison that s with the Wiin Pro Plus... not the Pro...
AKM AK4493S in "plus" and s3..
Do your research
;-)
(I'm inclined to think that the vast majority of users of these kinds of affordable streamers will use them in asymmetrical mode...don't you think? ;-)
I just regret this overemphasis on "symmetry connectic" (when the topic should be software, features, etc.)... and the lack of measures focused on asymmetrical... that's all.
)

And rest assured...
I won't be any more lenient with Wiim..
- Analog input not good...
- Could do better in terms of digital output quality...
-Headphone output is modest on the Ultra...

And the bad idea, given the well-known marketing impact , of the lack of symmetry, at least since the "plus" and then the ultra...
Fosi jumped on the bandwagon...
but it can't hide everything else.
Relax ... It's an exchange forum only ...
 
I m relax... ;-)
 
Not sure why someone would choose this when RPi5/Moode supports more streaming options and offers the ability to plug in a USB stick and stream local music with a fantastic album interface while also supporting UPnP?
...
My reason would be Qobuz Connect, available in RPi only with a 60€/year Volumio subscription
 
Amir. hankst for getting up out of your sick bed to give us this fine review.

Once again, another golden age product: streamer with a transparent dac, multiple outputs including XLR, sub, and spdif digital output. Too bad it's not quite Roon Ready. On a product like this being Room ready is the gold standard, but even so this guy deserves a silver medal for providing all that performance for the value price of $260. Just get a pair of Fosi V3's for another $218, and a pair of Asic C6bs for $1600, and for barely more than $2k have something that for most people, would be all the system they will ever need.
 
I have several Bluesound and like them, I have Wiim Pro Plus and like it as well.

Balance out and eARC are two wishes I had for those.

Thanks for reviewing, not a Roon user but understand the want if you do use it.

SINAD better than any amp I have so seems to be an excellent fit.
My only “worry” would be the software side.
Might wait until the “Pro” or “Ultra” is released…
 
Thank you for the review, @amirm,

With the exception of a luminous indicator-ring, around its volume knob; I believe the FOSI S3 feature-set is all about what most of us have been asking for.
Promised streaming capabilities would not be a deal breaker for my needs.
But using its ETH for a NAS music-library and feeding a Dante 'stream' within the LAN would be well appreciated, along with a solid eARC implementation.
Although I gave it a HappyPanther vote, I think I am going to wait for the "Plus" version, when S3's kinks are fully ironed out!:(
...Airplay and UPnP is provided the latter of which I used for my testing...
May I ask what the input source of your UPnP testing was?
 
Graphic:


And here's confirmation that it's indeed fixed frequency, fixed Q (click the arrow to see the full message):
I mentioned in the thread that the hardware doesn’t support PEQ as I read somewhere, does someone know for sure if its hardware limitations or just software implementation issue?
Somehow many were under impression that PEQ would be available on it later.
 
Wondering if you tested eARC as well?
and any possibility of RCA input (ADC) measurements?
Shameful to say, I didn't notice either until I was posting the review. :) I thought it had RCA in but then the fog of still being a bit sick me think it was just out. Will measure with S/PDIF In and report back.
 
And Chromecast in my testing truncated to 16 bits.
Is this a serious limitation? What about CDs, 16 bits?
I know that some people believe that they can reliably hear a difference with Bluetooth, but I am absolutely certain that with a well implemented BT, the vast majority of people will not hear any difference.
Fair point. But then again this site is about objective reviews backed up by measurements and measurements are showing differences.

And thanks @amirm for testing, hope you are getting well soon!
 
I m relax... ;-)

I know that some people believe that they can reliably hear a difference with Bluetooth, but I am absolutely certain that with a well implemented BT, the vast majority of people will not hear any difference.

Blinded listening and level matching over multiple trials, I would be shocked if many people could differentiate BT 9 times out of 10 which would be required in my mind to demonstrate reliable discrimination. Just my opinion though.
There's no way I could tell the difference between LDAC 990kbps and higher quality content.
 
There's no way I could tell the difference between LDAC 990kbps and higher quality content.

However, there is a notable difference between AAC, AptX, SBC and LDAC, and the measurements speak for themselves...

 
Blinded listening and level matching over multiple trials, I would be shocked if many people could differentiate BT 9 times out of 10 which would be required in my mind to demonstrate reliable discrimination. Just my opinion though.
These broad claims better be based on facts, not opinions. At least try it yourself to see if it is true for you. Until then, here is published, controlled listening tests of SBC:

1776975779422.png


It only achieves transparency in one track, the easy classical one.

Here is AptX:
1776975968096.png


In my own ad-hoc listening tests, SBC is better than both AAC and Aptx. Only LDAC beats it which is not always supported at both ends.
 
Once past a certain level of performance (which this is), I worry/care more about how I interface with a device like this than about technical performance.
Bingo...

I am happy with the several WiiM units I have around the house despite somewhat lower technical performance - the app works well and they connect to my home network and everything pretty cleanly. To me that functionality is the prerequisite for a streamer. If I were getting into multi room streaming today, I'd have a close look at the S3, with a critical eye to app functionality above all. Transparent sound isn't worth much if the streamer won't actually play stuff the way you want it to. I assume it's good in that regard but I agree it's the top concern for anything in this category.

Glad to see Fosi going after this market - if nothing else it will keep WiiM honest. :)
 
Back
Top Bottom