• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

FOSI S3 Balanced Streamer Review

Rate this streamer

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 1 0.5%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 13 6.5%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 84 42.0%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 102 51.0%

  • Total voters
    200

amirm

Founder/Admin
Staff Member
CFO (Chief Fun Officer)
Joined
Feb 13, 2016
Messages
50,386
Likes
300,780
Location
Seattle Area
This is a review and measurements of the Fosi S3 streamer and DAC. It was sent to me by the company and costs US $260.
Fosi-S3-Balanced-Hi-Fi-Streamer-Audio-UPnP-stereo-review.jpg

The labels are hard to read but otherwise, the unit fits the "ID" of other Fosi products. What put a smile on my face was not the front, but the back:
Fosi-S3-Balanced-Hi-Fi-Streamer-Audio-UPnP-stereo-exl-back-side-rear-review.jpg

Did not expect the XLR balanced outputs! There is also S/PDIF out allowing you to use an external DAC. Inclusion of Trigger out to power on your amplifier is also a very nice touch.

There is an app to control it as well as a remote control. Power is provided by a small switching power supply, double the size of the typical mobile phone charger.

Support for streaming protocol at this point is limited. Roon is waiting for certification. And Chromecast in my testing truncated to 16 bits. Airplay and UPnP is provided the latter of which I used for my testing.

Fosi S3 Streamer Measurements
As usual, we start with our dashboard, streaming UPnP from my desktop over Ethernet:
Fosi S3 Balanced Hi-Fi Streamer Audio UPnP measurement.png

I tested Toslink input and got the same excellent results:
Best streamer review 2026 stereo.png

Best streamer review 2026 balanced stereo.png


Dynamic range is very nice for class:
Fosi S3 Balanced Hi-Fi Streamer Audio UPnP Dynamic Range measurement.png


As is Multitone intermodulation test:
Fosi S3 Balanced Hi-Fi Streamer Audio UPnP Multitone measurement.png


Noise floor in jitter test is not state of the art but again, very good for this category of product:
Fosi S3 Balanced Hi-Fi Streamer Audio UPnP jitter measurement.png


Finally, we have our typical filter roll off with excellent attenuation above 24 kHz for CD sampling:
Fosi S3 Balanced Hi-Fi Streamer Audio UPnP DAC Filter measurement.png


Since my analyzer can't control streaming devices, this is all that I could (easily) test.
Addendum: additional tests.
I ran some sweeps for the DAC using Toslink (streaming should be the same).

IMD:
Fosi S3 Balanced Hi-Fi Streamer Audio UPnP DAC IMD Distortion measurement.png

As noted, it is very nice for the class. There are no "humps" and output is as expected.

THD+N vs Frequency:
Fosi S3 Balanced Hi-Fi Streamer Audio UPnP THD vs Freq measurement.png

This is good. Of course, it is not state of the art but neither is the device in that class.

This is the dashboard using RCA Out:
Fosi S3 Balanced Hi-Fi Streamer Audio Toslink RCA Measurement.png

Nearly the same as XLR.

Analog Preamp:
I tested RCA in, XLR Out:
Fosi S3 Balanced Hi-Fi Streamer Audio UPnP RCA in analog preamp measurement XLR.png

At nearly 100 dB, the SINAD is much better than I expected. RCA performance is the same:
Fosi S3 Balanced Hi-Fi Streamer Audio UPnP RCA in analog preamp measurement RCA.png

Notice how the output is properly 2 volts for RCA and 4 volts for XLR. So you get unity gain for either output.

Finally, I tested digital in, digital out (Toslink in both cases):
Fosi S3 Balanced Hi-Fi Streamer Audio UPnP Toslink Digital In Out Volume Control measurement.png

I turned off dither in the generator, giving is ideal, 24-bit, bit-exact output.

Furthermore, the output can be adjusted with volume control! This means you can drive a DAC without volume control, or an active speaker with Toslink digital input.

Really good results.

Conclusions
I must say, I did not expect Fosi to jump into streaming domain given the heavy software burden that brings with it. They have licensed the core technology which eases entry but also causes delays in bug fixes and feature enhancements. We see some of that effect here but what is there is quite solid. Measured performance is excellent as is support for my favorite, balanced output. Value is quite high given the price point.

I am going to give my recommendation to Fosi S3 streamer. I would have ranked it the highest levels if it had support for Roon already available.
----------
As always, questions, comments, recommendations, etc. are welcome.

Any donations are much appreciated using: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/forum/index.php?threads/how-to-support-audio-science-review.8150/
 
Last edited:
Why not value in asym and just sym?
(The other machines of the same type were measured asymmetrically. )
Imd?

Are measurements of the analog inputs coming soon? Or sub output?
;-)
 
The big oversight is no visible way to see the volume on the device itself
 
We still don't know the principles upstream of the subwoofer output... and how the potentiometer on the front panel works...
 
The big oversight is no visible way to see the volume on the device itself
Isn't this fairly typical in this price category?
 
We still don't know the principles upstream of the subwoofer output... and how the potentiometer on the front panel works...
What do you mean? It adjusts the output level. For my testing I cranked it up to max and got the nominal 4 volt.
 
What do you mean? It adjusts the output level. For my testing I cranked it up to max and got the nominal 4 volt.
(I was talking about the ""substance""... at what point in the process did it come into play this potentiometer( type?) ? In numeric ? In analogique?)

Why not highlight the unbalanced measurements common to other machines of the same type, and just XLR?
Here we understand that this machine is very comparable in audio quality to its direct competitors in the Wiim category, even in the same class (same DAC of the "Plus")...

but it plays the "balanced" marketing card, which "looks high-quality"...
You're contributing to that...


Will there be a richer approach with more unbalanced measurements in the future? Since the topic here...

(even though the main issue to come will be the software development or not)

What does FOSI currently offer on these audio outputs? Level adjustments? Types of filters from the AKM? Subwoofer filter processing?
;-)
 
but it plays the "balanced" marketing card, which "looks high-quality"...
It is a real feature that highly reduces the chances of ground loops. You are confused thinking it is a market thing. I am sure they put it in there due to us asking for it.
 
(I was talking about the ""substance""... at what point in the process did it come into play this potentiometer( type?) ? In numeric ? In analogique?)
What??? It is remote controlled (so at least digitally controlled) and produces the excellent results in the measurements. Why are you worried about it?
 
It is a real feature that highly reduces the chances of ground loops. You are confused thinking it is a market thing. I am sure they put it in there due to us asking for it.
What percentage of people will use them? ;-)
I know the potential benefits of symmetry... rest assured... ;-)

But why only highlight symmetry?
You're not usually this radical, it seems to me... (even though we know that generally it gives slightly better figures than asymmetric)
Why not your IMD sweeps?
And other typical metrics that you usually include?
(even though we can imagine there won't be any unpleasant surprises)
 
Regular Wiim Pro is in lower performance class:

index.php
Same like ..."pro plus"... not "pro"
Famille of "plus "( akm) or ultra (ess)
;-)
 
Last edited:
But ever since the "plus" comment, we keep pointing the finger at Wiim, knowing the market and its marketing... Sym's absence was a blunder... it's stupid.
Fosi understood that perfectly well...
( same dac from "plus " with "opa1612" )

This will certainly make people think about the future of Wiim...
which is just learning about the audio market... being more focused on software culture, etc., Linkplay...
(but they have a few years/development head start on Fosi...)
 
Last edited:
However, one can hope—I sometimes hope—that even with "secondary inputs"... the analog input will be much better than the disappointing Wiim input.
What's the situation?
Subwoofer output? ( filterLoudspeaker and sub? Or just sub? Etc)
 
Last edited:
Given the need for a shorter and more condensed review than usual...

it would have been better to stick to asymmetrical configurations...a case shared by all machines...
(Even if, realistically, the values are only slightly better in symmetry... marginally... but for the principle...)

Focusing on the detail of the sym presence for such a machine...
is a good point from FOSI...
hehe
(Connectic like "ultra"..dac from "plus"...The problem is precisely what to do with this connectors.)
 
Last edited:
There is also S/PDIF out allowing you to use an external DAC.
Or to add a headphone amp. A super nice low budget package for the living room (HDMI).
Amazing how affordable such devices can be.

 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom