I like it a lot, ordered! (#3).
Some suggested changes before release:
- Mono/Stereo should be moved to bottom or back to avoid expected volume changes or electrical failures. What happens if you switch it by mistake?
- The Mono Balanced/Unbalanced input on the back should be labeled. What happens if you have both L/R inputs connected in mono mode?
- The Power switch should be moved from the volume knob to where the Input switch is now, and the Input moved to the Mono/Stereo spot. This is no big deal on the V3, but on dual mono amps keeping the volume precisely the same, and controlling things through a pre-amp is important. With the power switch in the volume you have to re-adjust each time. What happens when you have 2 amps connected in mono? Could there be a way to have one amp control both? A volume controlled Pre-out could perhaps work that way.
Trey To asks a good question in the Kickstarter comments: "When the amplifier is off, is the signal still getting passed through the sub out?" If you move the power switch that would become more important.
1) Agree on the moving the Mono / Stereo switch to the back with a slider switch as many are advocating.
2) Disagree with all who have said to move the input switch to the back. Personally I have a very simple use case -- and I think many other enthusiasts will have the same, which is 2 input devices.
In my case I have an SMSL D-6 and a turntable. I suspect many others might have a similar setup. For my Fosi V3, I finally got out an old school GE branded RCA audio + video (composite + S-video) switch box to stop swapping RCA cables. Interestingly enough, I got the SMSL D-6 for the ability to go to balanced inputs in the future, namely if the LA90 got a permanent "fix" for reliability. With the ZA3, I could yank the RCA switch box out of the cabling.
3) For symmetry on the front, move the XLR / RCA toggle to the right and replace the left toggle with On / Off / Trigger 3-way toggle (or 2-way [On] / [Off | Trigger]). The 12v trigger makes no sense unless it operates exclusively as a Power+Volume defeat, which is the most logical mode of operation given the lack of On / Off / Trigger switch. An On / Off / Trigger switch re-enables the Volume control assuming the existing trigger is in fact a Power+Volume defeat (otherwise how does 12v Trigger work???).
4) Not a fan of the Sub Out, would much prefer the fully buffered / input isolated A07 stereo output approach with no filters. I'm not sure what all the people asking for filters and slopes is about, I would much prefer that low pass and high pass (rumble) filtering be built into my sub amp with selectable 12 vs 24 dB slopes. Heck, I would rather use one of these -
https://www.amazon.com/Amplifier-Audio-Subwoofer-Equalizer-Controller/dp/B07D6JTD4V/ if I am using a full range amp as a sub amp than have that extra cost of filters built into an amp.
5) PFFB. If implementing a PFFB can get to around a 94 or higher SINAD as seen with the JL Sylph D200, I think it makes a good case for a $120-150 (higher?) USD price point with a sufficiently stout 40-48v PSU at >5A. Oh, and go to Coilcraft or similar higher quality inductors if there is a sound quality or current handling increase to be had. The Fosi ZA3 here is claiming the same 88 SINAD of the V3, so the
*only* big compelling feature is bridged mode.
All of that said, I doubt Fosi will be revising this device as much. I'll probably wait for them to release something with PFFB.
When Fosi, Aiyima, and others return to revising their "all in one" integrated designs with Bluetooth and 2.0/2.1 outputs (i.e. BT30D Pro / A07 Pro), it's worth an extra $10-20 for most people to get a remote for input, volume, and power control. If it has volume and BT input options, it really needs a remote. And either digital volume display (e.g. SMSL D-6) or volume tic mark LED arc around the volume knob while using an encoder wheel for volume if that is cheaper than motorized volume pots for remote control.
In the very opposite direction, as with the V3, ZA3, and A07 Max, a stripped down version with stereo / bridge mono, no volume control, just a trigger / power switch, integrated PSU (or shared across multiple "big brick" external PSU), and maxed out output quality definitely has a place in the market as shown by Topping.
In the bridged mono sub amp market, something of similar quality to the A07 Max / ZA3, built as mono only (save some parts cost), trigger / auto-sense input on (i.e. like many car amps) with low and high pass line level filtering. Put in a switch or jumper for 12 vs 24 dB per octave slope on the low pass and maybe 18 or 24 dB / octave for high pass. If I recall my electrical engineering correctly, a jumper or toggle switch should let you do a pretty easy 12 db / octave 80-300 Hz low pass that switches to 24 dB / octave 40-150 Hz low pass, allowing both ends of integration -- desktop / PC speakers playing down to ~200Hz with gentle roll off to a small sub versus more audiophile or home theater integration with larger speakers and a bigger sub. High pass for rumble filtering / sub protection should be at least 18dB / octave with a range ~12-50 Hz for various interesting homebrew subs like tapped horns and higher order enclosures that need a steep slope for driver protection. Another interesting design feature for dedicated sub amps would be a chassis design that can be either shelf / desktop based and has mounting holes to hang it on the back of a sub like a plate amp.
As far as cheap features that would be selling points to a wider audience, I'm waiting to see the first class D chip amp that includes a heat pipe between the chip and chassis as marketechture. It's largely unnecessary (?) for such fast transient cooling except perhaps in the above sub amp example running at topped out input voltage such as 52v input with 8-10A behind it and running hotter at all times.