Sure, but isn't it a case where the 7cm height was carefully devised to elevate the sound of music to new levels? That's another bad point for ZD3: it can't accommodate these tall opamsp, and users would have to accept the flat sound of all these low-profile opamps !!!
One more time, this is in the ZD3 features description by Fosi:
View attachment 408674
I am looking for a transparent DAC... so I should buy the ZD3 and swap the opamps to this Sparkos SS3602--that's the only one delivering a "Transparent Signature". But... but, I should only listen to Classical, Jazz, and Audiophiles Recordings? What the...???
And there is no recommendation for Country Music... ZD3 is not recommended for Country Music...??? OMG !!!
Oh and by the way, what is the definition of an "audiophile recording" that I shall play with the Sparkos SS36022? Where can I find those recordings? How are they labelled / tagged? What would make a recording not qualifying as "audiophile recording"?
I shall stop my ranting here, but I hope it is clear that these baseless, unproved, opamp "signatures" and genre "recommendations" are, IMO, damaging the whole Fosi brand credibility.
Unless Fosi comes up with its data/measurement supporting their claims & recommendations...
But surely there's irony in this, when everybody else outside this hobby would balk at the idea of spending money on, what is essentially, another headphone jack!
"Why do you need a DAC/amp, when I have a perfectly good headphone jack on my computer?"
I watched that Audio Masterclass video, and there is a difference between those two op-amp recordings. So is op-amp rolling to us what DAC/amps are to everyone else?