• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Fosi Audio V3 Mono Amplifier Review

Rate this amplifier:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 13 1.9%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 21 3.1%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 129 19.3%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 506 75.6%

  • Total voters
    669
The SMSL PO100 Pro. Seems to be a USB to SPDIF /I2S converter, why do you need this in your signal chain?
 
The whole separate mains supplies to each amp / streamer thing was a concern to me (my amps sit directly behind each of my stereo speakers and plug into different mains sockets, although almost certainly on the same circuit.)

And yet it doesn’t seem to matter how I turn on or off my system it behaves it’s self very well with no nasty noises whatsoever. I have even tried provoking it !
 
The SMSL PO100 Pro. Seems to be a USB to SPDIF /I2S converter, why do you need this in your signal chain?
They allege it reduces jitter from the digital signal. Essentially a reclocker. I am somewhat skeptical but also curious.
 
I was hoping to test the reclocking idea
Also utterly pointless.

They allege it reduces jitter from the digital signal. Essentially a reclocker. I am somewhat skeptical but also curious.

You should be skeptical. Jitter in modern DACS is rejected to at least an order of magnitude or two below audibility - even on an interface which carries the clock like Toslink. Further - if your input to the DAC is USB, there is no jitter in any case, since the DAC clock fully controls the clocking.

Re-clocking is another of those totally useless audiophile fetishes.
 
Last edited:
Hello! Dear owners of this device, do you have any pop when turning on/off this device? Thank you)
 
Hello! Dear owners of this device, do you have any pop when turning on/off this device? Thank you)
None. I use them on auto and they turn on and off with a solenoid click but no pop through the speakers. They turn off very slightly out of time with each other. If I turn my DAC off they turn themselves on for 10 minutes. If I turn my DAC on, they won’t notice until there is an audio signal.
 
Hello! Dear owners of this device, do you have any pop when turning on/off this device? Thank you)
I get two pops when my source triggers the Fosi ZD3 and then the auto feature on the V3's. I have been in communication with Fosi and recently sent them a video to see if they can solve the problem. Their customer service is great.
 
Is it worth swapping the opamps out in the v3 mono? Ideally for something that won't break the bank to buy 4 of...
 
I have had a chance to listen to Fosi V3's for about a week now. I do like the Wiim Ultra/Fosi V3 Mono (x2) combo. I also have run it though the Fosi ZD3 DAC too. I like the combo with the DAC but without also sounds lovely too. I have been listening using the Totem Sttaf speakers. My concern is eventually upgrading my speakers to something like a CSS Audio 2TD-X or Blachard MLTL6 and whether the V3 mono's could power them. Tomorrow I am going to check out a Cambridge Audio CXA61 and CXA81. What are everyone's thoughts? Do you think the little class D V3's could power the CSS and MLTL6 and get the most out of them compared to a full sized class A/B amp?
 
I have had a chance to listen to Fosi V3's for about a week now. I do like the Wiim Ultra/Fosi V3 Mono (x2) combo. I also have run it though the Fosi ZD3 DAC too. I like the combo with the DAC but without also sounds lovely too. I have been listening using the Totem Sttaf speakers. My concern is eventually upgrading my speakers to something like a CSS Audio 2TD-X or Blachard MLTL6 and whether the V3 mono's could power them. Tomorrow I am going to check out a Cambridge Audio CXA61 and CXA81. What are everyone's thoughts? Do you think the little class D V3's could power the CSS and MLTL6 and get the most out of them compared to a full sized class A/B amp?
CXA61 & CXA81 are rated with 60w & 80w (8 ohm load), you have power output measured for v3 mono in the first post here.
You can choose any but v3 aren’t short on power.
 
Is it worth swapping the opamps out in the v3 mono? Ideally for something that won't break the bank to buy 4 of...
It's selecting a OP amp part that has no basis in science to be more compatible with the circuitry they are installed in. By the time you spend money on them and plug them in or solder them in place you may damage the PCB or peripherals and there is no guarantee that they will sound better or even different in some cases. It's guessing...
 
Is it worth swapping the opamps out in the v3 mono? Ideally for something that won't break the bank to buy 4 of...
In the worst-case scenario, you could cause the amplifier to oscillate due to the circuitry not being compatible with the operational amplifier you've selected. There's a slight chance you might perceive an increased "airiness" effect as a result of the high frequency distortion that could occur.
I'd much rather advice you to use tone controls to change the sound... :)
 
I have had a chance to listen to Fosi V3's for about a week now. I do like the Wiim Ultra/Fosi V3 Mono (x2) combo. I also have run it though the Fosi ZD3 DAC too. I like the combo with the DAC but without also sounds lovely too. I have been listening using the Totem Sttaf speakers. My concern is eventually upgrading my speakers to something like a CSS Audio 2TD-X or Blachard MLTL6 and whether the V3 mono's could power them. Tomorrow I am going to check out a Cambridge Audio CXA61 and CXA81. What are everyone's thoughts? Do you think the little class D V3's could power the CSS and MLTL6 and get the most out of them compared to a full sized class A/B amp?

You're asking if the v3 are enough and you'll try the cambridges with less power?

Ok, I'm officially confused :)
 
Is it worth swapping the opamps out in the v3 mono? Ideally for something that won't break the bank to buy 4 of...

When I worked in industry as an electronics designer I would select op amps based on a whole range of key parameters, I recall thinking that even the very low cost units far exceeded the needs of most of my instrumentation requirements, but invariably I would select something with lower noise provided that I didn’t compromise an electrically robust solution. The extra cost was insignificant given our low production numbers of what was a specialist product. Plus I never really thought of audio as being a particularly challenging branch of electronics design, but then I wasn’t aiming for ‘Topping’ levels of performance!

And yet in my home audio projects I would obsess over offset, slew rate, noise etc. with no real basis for my paranoia. I never heard any benefit from using what I considered to be ‘exotic’ components and certainly didn’t have access to test equipment that could reliably detect any objective benefit.

In my opinion the venerable NE5532 is pretty good.
 
Last edited:
You're asking if the v3 are enough and you'll try the cambridges with less power?

Ok, I'm officially confused :)

I think, perhaps we should spend a little more time testing the actual power profile of our listening habits.

I am lured in by the need for ‘More-Power’ as much as the next person, however I strongly suspect that the actual need is much lower than we might think. Even with my relatively inefficient loudspeakers 100W is way more than I need.
 
Is it worth swapping the opamps out in the v3 mono? Ideally for something that won't break the bank to buy 4 of...
I tried the Muse02's that Fosi supplied in the Kickstarter along with another pair I have supplied with a DAC I use - tried with my vinyl set up - and the NE5532's went back in pretty quickly. I really questioned Fosi's suggestion / provision of these alternatives. I'm pretty sure @Old_School_Brad 's high frequency distortion effect was the result ... without any pleasant 'airiness'.
 
You're asking if the v3 are enough and you'll try the cambridges with less power?

Ok, I'm officially confused :)
I guess I am wondering if class a/b rated at 60 watts per channel is cleaner than class D at 100+ watts per channel especially at extreme volumes both soft and loud. The reviews seem to suggest listening at loud volume causes distortion above 85 db. Or is this a stupid question?
 
Back
Top Bottom