Just listened to this through Apple earbuds and the Apple lightning dac. Classic blue note. Thanks! Why wouldn’t it be appropriate with this Fosi?What I mean is that 99% of the population listen to bad music recordings (which also have dynamic range < or << 10 dB). For them this amplifier is more than enough. And cheap loudspeakers with cheap crossovers and...
It is not appropriate for thisavery good album.
Of course we will post here.Can you post here when new and improved model arrives?
Right, because Youtube audio equipment comparison videos are so high quality and trust worthy nowThe comparison with the tube amp at the end.... brutal. The class D amp sounded like someone squeezed Nora's throat with both hands and forced her to sing at the gunpoint. Ouch.
Right, because Youtube audio equipment comparison videos are so high quality and trust worthy now
I guess you somehow think the algorithm causes the sound differences?
Actually now I'm curious; do you hear a difference with headphones on?
Thanks for the detailed response. Virtually all of my listening is classical and jazz and acoustic realism is a high priority.Yes, they have. Because a lot of them
Cheap class D amps have problemas with HF. Usually > 1 kHz (phase). The range 1-4 kHz is very important, our ears are very sensitive and it is convenient that the frequency response is as linear as possible, horizontal or inclined, but linear.
They also suffer from a phase change, which should be constant throughout the audio range (with class A and AB it is not a problem and it is usual, the merit is that it is < 1º at 20 kHz). Also distortion tends to increase with high frequency.
If you listen to poorly produced music, without physical instruments, voices adulterated with Autotune... then those inconveniences are much less. But if you listen to a jazz quartet, folk, orchestral mass... then it does matter. The point is that today very few listen to this type of music or similar, so it is stupid to spend a lot of money on music equipment. So FOSI does very well by focusing on that 99% of the population.
In class D, the only one that convinces me is the Hypex Nilai500DIY, much more than Purifi (perhaps only better with electronic music).
I guess you somehow think that a chain made up of his listening system, plus his environment, plus his microphone, plus his adc plus youtube compression, plus your listening system are able to tell you how a "sounds" amplifier
Except very very few trusted youtubers you can't trust a random guy with their "comparison" videos. Especially if he is trying to prove a non sense thing (class D sounds dry etc. ) there are so much they can do to "prove" their bias.
I guess you somehow think the algorithm causes the sound differences?
Actually now I'm curious; do you hear a difference with headphones on?
I'm well aware. Trust me. I've clarified above.Except very very few trusted youtubers you can't trust a random guy with their "comparison" videos. Especially if he is trying to prove a non sense thing (class D sounds dry etc. ) there are so much they can do to "prove" their bias.
Then you have equipment issues. And yes youtube compression
Hi friendHow it sounds? BT20A Pro with Various Op-Amps Demonstration
View attachment 279379
I wrote:
1º OP249
2º OPA2604
It is surprising how well the familiar NE5532 stands the test of time.
The worst, RM4559
Good question.what exactly does Fosi mean, Foxy?
@Fosi Audio
Not related to the company name... but yes. One can only assume the optimal op-amp for the circuit has been used, however I see the company actively encourages op-amp rolling. Why is that... has the optimal op-amp been used for the design, or no? If so, why this advertising of op-amp rolling? My suggestion would be to let that go and not market your devices that way, as if you imply there are improvements to be gained from op-amp rolling, then it has a negative implication for stock parts used.Do you have any suggestions?![]()
Yes, drilling holes is fun, which we are doing on our new model.You can always drill holes into the cabinet yourself.![]()
Maybe because they realize that many so-called "audiophiles" aren't real adults but children who want to play with their toys.Not related to the company name... but yes. One can only assume the optimal op-amp for the circuit has been used, however I see the company actively encourages op-amp rolling. Why is that... has the optimal op-amp been used for the design, or no? If so, why this advertising of op-amp rolling? My suggestion would be to let that go and not market your devices that way, as if you imply there are improvements to be gained from op-amp rolling, then it has a negative implication for stock parts used.
JSmith
The stock ones are good enough to satisfy most users. However, we realized many audiophiles love to DIY. They are pleased to find an amp that allows them to roll the op-amps or other components to achieve their desired sound and functionality.Not related to the company name... but yes. One can only assume the optimal op-amp for the circuit has been used, however I see the company actively encourages op-amp rolling. Why is that... has the optimal op-amp been used for the design, or no? If so, why this advertising of op-amp rolling? My suggestion would be to let that go and not market your devices that way, as if you imply there are improvements to be gained from op-amp rolling, then it has a negative implication for stock parts used.
JSmith
The stock ones are good enough to satisfy most users.
In a way your reply concerns me even more now...to achieve their desired sound