• WANTED: Happy members who like to discuss audio and other topics related to our interest. Desire to learn and share knowledge of science required. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Fosi Audio Box X5 Phono Preamp Review

Rate this phono stage:

  • 1. Poor (headless panther)

    Votes: 4 2.0%
  • 2. Not terrible (postman panther)

    Votes: 8 4.0%
  • 3. Fine (happy panther)

    Votes: 35 17.5%
  • 4. Great (golfing panther)

    Votes: 153 76.5%

  • Total voters
    200
While doing that sounds nice in theory, in practice that opens a "can of worms". What cartridge, which stylus profile, what turntable, which test record, how many times do you play the rest record before tossing it, etc. Significantly changing the test protocols basically invalidates previous results. While the testing routine may not be "perfect", it does provide "value".

It's more important to have a correct load on the front end for MM, not a 20R AP generator source impedance.
 
Who knows, maybe Fosi will come out with an upmarket model with capacitance and loading controls and a subsonic filter? Maybe a mono button to decrease surface noise when playing mono records too. Their design has great bones and they can differentiate future models by piling on features.
 
Why is the maximum output frequency dependent above 5k? I thought that was a quality of units with passive RIAA, but I assume this unit uses active RIAA?

Can anyone enlighten me?
 
MM 47k, MC 100R

Is that documented anywhere?
Even after repeated requests, I don't see a reply from Fosi about this, and the Fosi site only has this for specs:

Specifications

  • Input Mode: MM+MC RCA
  • Output Mode: RCA
  • THD: ≤0.009%
  • SNR: ≥ 92dB
  • Device Dimension: 4.1 x 6.5 x 1.4 inches
  • Power Supply: 16V/1A
No mention of input C or input Z.
No user manual to read either. (Hmmm....)

Also,

Multiple Gain Settings: With 4-Level gain adjustment settings of 38/48/56/66dB, the preamplifier accommodates both MM & MC cartridge types
--
 
I STILL want to see measurements of actual vinyl playback. I WANT TO KNOW THE ACTUAL PLAYBACK SINAD from a test disc!

If we look at this.
50 dB H2 distortion for a Shure V15 VMR with a Wayne Kirkwood Flat MM using a clearaudio test disc.

The CBS test disc was just 30 dB distortion
 
Hello ASR community !

My friends gift me a audio-technica at-lp60x, my first turntable ! Is this pre-amplifier a good investiment from the internal pre-amp from my turntable ?

Sorry my english is not perfect :D.
 
Last edited:
Is that documented anywhere?
Even after repeated requests, I don't see a reply from Fosi about this, and the Fosi site only has this for specs:

Specifications

  • Input Mode: MM+MC RCA
  • Output Mode: RCA
  • THD: ≤0.009%
  • SNR: ≥ 92dB
  • Device Dimension: 4.1 x 6.5 x 1.4 inches
  • Power Supply: 16V/1A
No mention of input C or input Z.
No user manual to read either. (Hmmm....)

Also,

Multiple Gain Settings: With 4-Level gain adjustment settings of 38/48/56/66dB, the preamplifier accommodates both MM & MC cartridge types
--
There is a manual - No data for C, Z.
 
If it only had MC and MM capacity/loading settings...

Otherwise this looks like a great and muuuch cheaper alternative to Lehmann Audio phono's (Cambridge / NAD I don't mention because that's garbage tier build quality).
Loading can be easily accommodated via 2-way RCA splitters and loading plugs (as long as you are comfortable in doing a little DIY), but, yes, capacitance loading would be a nice-to-have (if FOSI Audio is listening). Maybe via sliders or jumpers on the underside?
 
There is a manual - No data for C, Z.
It's a simple 'how to'. Not really documentation.

You know, I think it's funny that we have a phono stage being judged on its superior SINAD, which you're extremely unlikely to get to hear because the surface noise from any record is going to absolutely bury the noise from the preamp. This preamp has really really low noise, which is great, but it lacks important features such as variable loading for MC cartridges and any useful documentation that would be helpful for cartidge-tonearm-cable matching.

Phonograph playback is an electro-mechanical system. The final quality of that playback system is going to be far more dependent on the cartridge-tonearm-turntable performance than on the performance of the phono correction/preamplifier stage. Unless there is something horribly wrong with the phono stage in use, I seriously doubt anyone with a U-Turn Orbit turntable is going to hear the difference between its built in phono stage and this Fosi Audio wonder preamp.

Had Fosi included capacitance and impedance loading options, I would think differently. Since phono cartridges definitely sound different into different C and Z loads, that would have made the product more useful and widely compatible.

Grado carts sound very good into 10k ohm load.

AT carts do not like high capacitance loads. 250pF max, I'd say, and that would include the roughly 150pF to 200pF from the tonearm wiring and turntable to preamp interconnect cable.

Vintage Shure, Stanton and Pickering MM cartridges tend to be higher in coil inductance (L) and internal series resistance (Rseries) and are supposed to work better into higher C loading. Some say they sound better into a higher than 47k load at the preamp input.

The Denon DL110 HOMC cartridge works well into as low as 1.5k ohms (its Zout is only 150R or so). It sounds more harsh and brittle into the standard 47k ohm load. More pleasant (to my ears, at least) into 1500 ohms.

The Denon DL103 MC cart works best into about 400 ohms (its Zout is about 40 ohms). However, many more expensive MC carts have Zout of 10 ohms or less, and those work well into a smaller 100 ohm load.

Unlike digital sources, there is no standard for C, L or Z in phono preamps, other than the 47k ohm input loading for MM carts. There's no standard at all for MC carts.

Anyway, it's fun to kibbitz about audio gear.
 
I would never give my money to a company that isn't able to provide even the most basic specs in a proper PDF datasheet as that shows either incompetence or a don't care attidude.
You best get out of audio market as this is by far the norm, than the exception. PDF? you must be kidding me...
 
You best get out of audio market as this is by far the norm, than the exception. PDF? you must be kidding me...
There is absolutely no excuse to not provide the data as it is available anyway and making a PDF document takes no more than maybe one hour of work (less if you have templates to build on). If the data isn't available in house, all bets are off.

Most competitors offer complete data and manuals and those are easly accessible and there are downloadable versions, for example for the $100 Pro-Ject Phono Box.
 
I suspect it will be worse than most of us imagine...
Won't most of the result there be dependent on the quality of the test record, on the deck, and on the cartridge. Far more so than the phono pre.
 
You best get out of audio market as this is by far the norm, than the exception. PDF? you must be kidding me...
Pro devices come with good documentation, e.g. RME's ADI2/4 pro that has a phono (MM) input
Also, Park Audio's documentation is decent
Of course, they are not in the same category (price/functionality)..
Edit (device with comparable price): the ART Phono Plus Phono Preamp & Audio Interface
 
Last edited:
I’ve been playing LP records for 48 years. The only seriously warped records I’ve seen were that way from day one. None of the flat ones ever warped themselves/

I have a closet full of them if you need some. :facepalm:
 
The Denon DL103 MC cart works best into about 400 ohms
That’s what most people say. The test sheet from the factory packaged in mine spec’ed the test condition as 1k ohms. I listened at 1k and 400 and all I could hear was the reduced volume. Output into 1k ohms , according to the test sheet .39mv. I set it at 1k.
 
Interesting phenomenon on these threads. A test of a phono stage followed by a discussion by people that like to listen to their vinyl records, interrupted by folks telling us how foolish we are. If you don’t play with vinyl, don’t ever want to play a vinyl record again, and think anyone that does so is a fool, why did you even read the review? I ride motorcycles. I own 4 of them. There are types and brands of motorcycles and riders that I think are foolish. I don’t feel compelled to monitor their discussions and occasionally jump in to tell them how ridiculous they are.
 
Last edited:
It's more important to have a correct load on the front end for MM, not a 20R AP generator source impedance.
I would agree. What can be inserted between the AP generator and the input to simulate a MM and MC generators?
 
Back
Top Bottom