Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions.
Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!
Oh well, then the jury is still out after all. At least the 2nd gen appears to use the same drivers as newer models (again), last updated in September. Not bad.
I'd be curious what frequency response and THD(f) may be looking like at maximum input gain.
I'm using the Scarlett Solo 3rd gen purely as a DAC for line-out/studio monitors, so the headphone output isn't relevant for me. Does it use the same DAC architecture as the reviewed 2i2 3rd gen, so the measurements in this review apply to the Solo 3rd gen as well?
I'm using the Scarlett Solo 3rd gen purely as a DAC for line-out/studio monitors, so the headphone output isn't relevant for me. Does it use the same DAC architecture as the reviewed 2i2 3rd gen, so the measurements in this review apply to the Solo 3rd gen as well?
While the Solo and 2i2 differ in a number of areas (like inputs and headphone output), the line-out section would not appear to be one of them. Specs for that are identical between the two, and measured dynamic range is within a fraction of a dB and meeting its 108 dB(A) spec:
That is also my experience with my 3rd generation unit. Between lowest input level setting and shortly before ADC clipping there might be a difference of about 6dB when measuring i.e. THD+N.
I read your post in diyaudio forum and I also agree with you that higher output levels > 1Vrms ( 0 dBV ) have too much harmonics and that is why I measure with 0dBVu ( 0.775Vrms ) in most cases, but avoid to get > 1Vrms.