• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

First REW measurement, please let me know what I can do better!

Hello Keith and hello to everyone else who is interested in this topic. Thank you very much for your input.

Regarding the current status, I have now rearranged my work/music area in the room itself. This means that I will take my first new measurements today and make them available later. I will also take these measurements tomorrow and the day after tomorrow. Here is my first question: are three measurements meaningful, or should I take more?

If I have understood marin.weigel correctly, should I always measure one speaker at a time and not both at the same time?
This means that I position the microphone in the seating area and take the measurement first with the left speaker and then with the right speaker?

You did not label your graphs with the SPL's. So I took a guess and labelled them 75dB/85dB/95dB.
Sorry for not labelling it correctly.

Because (1) and (2) are so unbelievable, I am inclined to think that you took your measurements incorrectly. It almost looks as if you took the measurements 3 times and then increased the SPL in REW.
It's possible that I measured it incorrectly.

1. Set your speaker up with no table in the way and your mic on a proper tripod. Put the speaker in the middle of the room, away from any furniture or boundaries that may cause reflections. It would be even better if you could take your speaker outside. The mic should be pointing at the speaker with the correct cal file loaded, exactly 1m away.
2. Using one speaker only, play pink noise in REW and adjust the output until it reads 65dB. Take a single 4M sweep. Label this "65dB"
Done!

3. Increase the electrical output in REW by 10dB. Do not adjust the output with pink noise, just increase the output by 10dB. Take another 4M sweep. Label this "75dB"
Here's what I did.
I turned up the volume by about 10 dB using the interface's volume control and then did it again.
If that's wrong, then I don't know how to increase the volume.
I watched the video, but it didn't really help me.

BTW another explanation for the rising treble response above 10kHz is microphone orientation / improper calibration file. @Waldemar-Johann please confirm pointing your mic at the speakers in ALL measurements, and with the correct calibration file loaded?
Attach your answer.

Thank you again for your continued help.

All the best and nice weekend,
Waldemar
 

Attachments

  • CAL.png
    CAL.png
    437.4 KB · Views: 57
Last edited:
View attachment 467124

Funny that. Sometimes you have a problem, sometimes you don't. I don't know what more I can do to help, I am out of ideas.

Anyway, if you want to DSP, it looks as if the bass measurements are reasonably consistent.
Good morning Keith,
Thank you very much for your reply and information.

Please don't despair!
The first measurements were taken with a microphone, which I may have used incorrectly. On top of that, I measured at a volume that was much too loud.

Thanks to you, I have now used the correct volume. This should be made clear to anyone who wants to take measurements. I wasn't aware of this!
Thanks to marin.weigel, who helped to make the measurement even more precise.

I will now take these measurements four more times and then post them here again to make sure that everything is now correct.
You write that it would be possible to do something with DSP under these circumstances.

I'm now taking two steps back and asking again, can I still make a significant improvement with room acoustics?
Does it make sense to include the subwoofer?

I am attaching a photo of what my room currently looks like.

All the best and a nice Saturday,
Waldemar
 

Attachments

  • Room.JPG
    Room.JPG
    1.6 MB · Views: 79
I'm now taking two steps back and asking again, can I still make a significant improvement with room acoustics?
Does it make sense to include the subwoofer?
I am attaching a photo of what my room currently looks like.
Your room size, layout and construction is truly suboptimal, to say the least.
You've been shuffling your room setup around a bit, recently.
Did you experience any notable improvements at all?
Judging by the measurements I'd guess no!

First, try that mattress behind the desk/speakers horizontally vs. vertically in the current setup.

Then, try that mattress vertically behind the desk/speakers, set up at 45°, facing the corner between the walls without windows.
I'd guess this helps a bit to tame lower mids on down.

It's probably always a good idea to pull the curtains over the glass surfaces to help tame reflections a bit from the midrange on upwards.
Ideally put something on the ceiling to help diffuse reflections a bit from the upper mids on upwards.
Filled but not necessarily tightly packed bookcases, covering most of the walls' surfaces, always help a lot from between the lower mids to mids on up.

Due to the wavelengths involved, remaining problems from the lower mids on down must be tackled with DSP, but by cutting peaks only.
Nothing you can do for the throughs, other than changing placement of speakers and listener - not too practical in that size room.

Once gone through optimizing all the former, consider adding your sub to the picture.
You'll then soon enough recognize that this opens yet another can of worms ...
 
Your room size, layout and construction is truly suboptimal, to say the least.
You've been shuffling your room setup around a bit, recently.
Did you experience any notable improvements at all?
Judging by the measurements I'd guess no!

First, try that mattress behind the desk/speakers horizontally vs. vertically in the current setup.

Then, try that mattress vertically behind the desk/speakers, set up at 45°, facing the corner between the walls without windows.
I'd guess this helps a bit to tame lower mids on down.

It's probably always a good idea to pull the curtains over the glass surfaces to help tame reflections a bit from the midrange on upwards.
Ideally put something on the ceiling to help diffuse reflections a bit from the upper mids on upwards.
Filled but not necessarily tightly packed bookcases, covering most of the walls' surfaces, always help a lot from between the lower mids to mids on up.

Due to the wavelengths involved, remaining problems from the lower mids on down must be tackled with DSP, but by cutting peaks only.
Nothing you can do for the throughs, other than changing placement of speakers and listener - not too practical in that size room.

Once gone through optimizing all the former, consider adding your sub to the picture.
You'll then soon enough recognize that this opens yet another can of worms ...
Hello Marin,
Thank you very much for your feedback and information.

I will have to see which of these I can implement.

I know that the room is more than optimal, and ultimately it is my workspace above all else.
As the saying goes, ‘Einen Tod muss man sterben.’
I knew that this room would never be a dream studio. My goal is to make the best of what I have, if possible.

If I understand you correctly, the subwoofer will create more problems than it solves?
If that's the case, no problem, that's how it is.

Then the last option would be DSP, but it's not certain that this is the right way to go?

It's probably always a good idea to pull the curtains over the glass surfaces to help tame reflections a bit from the midrange on upwards.
As for the curtains, I've done that.

All the best and a great Saturday,
Waldemar
 
Since you already own subwoofers, you may as well use them.

But to be honest, with a setup like yours, I wouldn't really bother. Your speakers are behind you when you are using your PC, the room is too small, speakers are too close together. Up to now we still have measurements which are uninterpretable because of very poor signal to noise ratio. Just looking at the measurements of your noise floor, I would think there is a TONNE of noise where you are, but when I asked you about this previously you said there isn't much noise.

1754146040060.png


As a reminder of how bad we are at subjectively evaluating noise, this is the noise floor in my house right now. I think it's pretty quiet, all I can hear are the crickets, the soft hum of the fridge, and the gentle rumble of my gas heater. But look at that, it's up to 55dB. All rooms typically have a rising bass noise floor which your brain is very good at filtering out.

So ... *shrug*. I don't know.
 
If I understand you correctly, the subwoofer will create more problems than it solves?

Then the last option would be DSP, but it's not certain that this is the right way to go?
What I actually meant was, that it'll be best to go one step at a time in a logical sequence to wring the optimum from what you have.

So first of all, fix room acoustics problems physically as best as possible to optimize measured results, and then,
secondly, use DSP to tame room mode peaks and tweak overall balance, and once that's done,
thirdly, add subwoofer(s) and physically best integrate to optimize measured results, to then,
lastly, use DSP once more to tame newly generated room mode peaks.

Trying to do all at the same time will just introduce more confusion and frustration than it'll help fix your issues.

Have a nice weekend yourself!
 
What I actually meant was, that it'll be best to go one step at a time in a logical sequence to wring the optimum from what you have.

So first of all, fix room acoustics problems physically as best as possible to optimize measured results, and then,
secondly, use DSP to tame room mode peaks and tweak overall balance, and once that's done,
thirdly, add subwoofer(s) and physically best integrate to optimize measured results, to then,
lastly, use DSP once more to tame newly generated room mode peaks.

Trying to do all at the same time will just introduce more confusion and frustration than it'll help fix your issues.

Have a nice weekend yourself!
Hello Marin,
Thank you again for your feedback.
I would like to do that too.
That is why I am asking you for advice and will try to implement it as far as possible, not in parallel but one after the other.

All the best,
Waldemar
 
Now I read Keith's response ... okay ...

... you are trying to optimize the sound at your PC desk, and not in the speakers' near field, facing the speakers!?
No,
this is my workplace.
To make music, I turn around. For me, music is the hardware.
I have to improvise and make the best of the current situation.

All the best,
Waldemar
 
Since you already own subwoofers, you may as well use them.

But to be honest, with a setup like yours, I wouldn't really bother. Your speakers are behind you when you are using your PC, the room is too small, speakers are too close together. Up to now we still have measurements which are uninterpretable because of very poor signal to noise ratio. Just looking at the measurements of your noise floor, I would think there is a TONNE of noise where you are, but when I asked you about this previously you said there isn't much noise.

View attachment 467256

As a reminder of how bad we are at subjectively evaluating noise, this is the noise floor in my house right now. I think it's pretty quiet, all I can hear are the crickets, the soft hum of the fridge, and the gentle rumble of my gas heater. But look at that, it's up to 55dB. All rooms typically have a rising bass noise floor which your brain is very good at filtering out.

So ... *shrug*. I don't know.
Hello Keith, thank you so much for your feedback and information.
When I did the first recording last night, I couldn't even feel my breath.
I left the room, turned off everything I could think of, such as the lights etc, and let the speakers, microphone and software do their work.

Your speakers are behind you when you are using your PC, the room is too small, speakers are too close together.
I can place the speakers even further apart, where should I then sit in order to keep the length of the triangle to some extent?

All the best,
Waldemar
 
Last edited:
Good evening everyone,
I have now taken four more measurements.
Nothing has changed since the last measurement.
My concern here is that the measurements are correct.
After my vacation I will improve the room acoustically and then take a new measurement.
Many thanks in advance.

All the best,
Waldemar
 

Attachments

I'm back with my last measurement.
I couldn't change much about the room.
What I had imagined didn't work out.
It is what it is.
 

Attachments

Back
Top Bottom