I hope this tech would eventually get in the all their active speakers . Maybe except the subs where human hearing of distorsion is not very good, wait maybe the current amps could allow other box alignments...
I use the channel HTC 3001 SE with my four LS 50s and two SB 2000's. Sounds great, and fits below my TV. Cost me $150 plus $70 for a Amiya A07 amp to give my system a legitimate center channel for my 5.1 home theater.Man on eBay I just found a full 5.1 SE set for 220€ an hour's drive away..
I wish I had a use for these![]()
Would be good if there were a unit that could be used on their passives as well. My LS 50 Metas would be perfect if they could play with 15 db lower levels of distortion.I hope this tech would eventually get in the all their active speakers . Maybe except the subs where human hearing of distorsion is not very good, wait maybe the current amps could allow other box alignments...
As a stand alone soundbar, its competition is the $999 Sonos Ultra and $999 high end JBL/Samsung soundbars, the remaining 99% of the soundbar market (which likely comprises >90% of total market revenue and sales) is below $500.Companies have to make profits, nothing strange about it.
$2500 if I got it right. I have no idea about this market but does not seem too much (I think)
So the question really is how close does this come to being a decent Atmos system in a small room with maybe just a sub added? If the answer is "real close" it's probably worth it.As a stand alone soundbar, its competition is the $999 Sonos Ultra and $999 high end JBL/Samsung soundbars, the remaining 99% of the soundbar market (which likely comprises >90% of total market revenue and sales) is below $500.
Canvas HifiAs a stand alone soundbar, its competition is the $999 Sonos Ultra and $999 high end JBL/Samsung soundbars, the remaining 99% of the soundbar market (which likely comprises >90% of total market revenue and sales) is below $500.
If the implementation on the subwoofer means that you can squeeze further extension and db´s on a given size of woofers, I am happy to get extra extension and loudness, even if I will not notice the distortion improvement due to how low the frequency is.I hope this tech would eventually get in the all their active speakers . Maybe except the subs where human hearing of distorsion is not very good, wait maybe the current amps could allow other box alignments...
In a nutshell, they compare the room and anechoic response, and use that to generate a filter.I'm curious how this kind of room correction works. A lot of B&O speakers and the Apple Homepod use this too.
Is there any significant correlation between the frequeny response at the speakers position which it measures and the (unknown) listening position?
Gyro? Can you give us any info on that? I didn’t see mention of that in the user manual.I've had my XIO for a week now. My room is 25'x25'x11'h. Open floor plan. My tv wall is in the right front quater of the room. My seating position is 8.5ft from the tv. I'm not looking for a theater experience as I have a hi-end dedicated room. My use case is for background music and tv when we are not in the theater. Bass is adequate sitting close but disappears when not in front of the bar' I'm waiting for the KC92 sub which should take care of the problem. As with the LS60s I demoed in my room the volumn is lacking as you have to really turn it up to get the full effect. and really need to sit near field.I would not call this audiophile as I have a 2 channel set up with Dali Epicon 6 speakers so I can justify my statement. But having said that my use case for music is fine. I]I only have six inches between my tv and fireplace so being able to turn this bar to face the sofa is a real plus and the gyro really works work when orienting it. Anyway I havethree more weeks to complete my demo before return or keeping it.I'll chime in again after the sub gets here.