• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

FIIO Warmer R2R DAC (with tube buffer)

Status
Not open for further replies.
He tries to make people think and elaborate on the how and why.
it is one thing to throw around words like 'part quality' but another thing to say which quality it is about and how that could matter for the signal.
Then he will ask for measurements (which there never is) or how that improvement was determined (which is always answered with.. I heard it).
 
He tries to make people think
Imagine having to actually think :facepalm:

Then he will ask for measurements
Well, we can have several steps in between, like explaining how these properties influence the signal and the audibility. Then we can talk about a controlled test, and if they yield a positive result, we can verify the initial hypothesis by measuring.

If you don’t like this or a similar approach, this place is probably not for you.
 
He tries to make people think and elaborate on the how and why.
it is one thing to throw around words like 'part quality' but another thing to say which quality it is about and how that could matter for the signal.
Then he will ask for measurements (which there never is) or how that improvement was determined (which is always answered with.. I heard it).
Your point is well received, but hearing is a sensor to determine if there is a sonic difference. I rather see your effort to explaine how this sonic change happens instead of saying I heard it. That would be worth to follow.
 
Your point is well received, but hearing is a sensor to determine if there is a sonic difference.
That’s not how it works. You make the claim, you’ll have to provide the proof.

Hearing is fine, as long as it’s hearing only! And as it stand we haven’t had any of that here in this topic. In fact, it was dismissed multiple times.
 
Your point is well received, but hearing is a sensor to determine if there is a sonic difference. I rather see your effort to explaine how this sonic change happens instead of saying I heard it. That would be worth to follow.
It is... but the hearing is notoriously easily fooled. This is extremely well documented by the way and known in the scientific world.

You CAN use the hearing to determine actual changes but to present this as 'real evidence' it needs to be done in a certain way that is very hard to do, takes great effort and is pretty exhausting and therefor only done in labs when scientific reports have to be presented and defended (peer reviewed).
Of course I can tell you how the sonic change you perceived happened. It has to do with perception (the brain) and is not necessarily related to the actual input into the ear canal.
 
1766350872566.png


Dreamy. :cool:
I think one needs to use FFT analysis to measure dreaminess.

1766350971392.png


Here's a fair comparison:


1766351203537.png



31 mm long, 16 mm diameter, +/- 10% tolerance, 150 WV

1766351283860.png

(OK, not quite 6 uF, but in the ballpark) ;)
length 33 mm, diameter 56 mm, +/- 2% tolerance, 800 WV

both from Madisound

price of the latter is tenfold (two orders of magnitude) higher... that's measurement enough! :)
 
It is... but the hearing is notoriously easily fooled. This is extremely well documented by the way and known in the scientific world.

You CAN use the hearing to determine actual changes but to present this as 'real evidence' it needs to be done in a certain way that is very hard to do, takes great effort and is pretty exhausting and therefor only done in labs when scientific reports have to be presented and defended (peer reviewed).
I do agree. We have hearing result and don't know how to translate it scientifically or don't have the knowledge, so you may step in to this area to elaborate the fact if you like, instead of ,,,.
 
Aendre's hearing
Once again: it’s not just his hearing, by a long shot! As long as that is the case, there is no point in finding any other scientific reason other than biases.
 
Once again: it’s not just his hearing, by a long shot! As long as that is the case, there is no point in finding any other scientific reason other than biases.
If the example size instead of 1, for example 100 or thousand would you think biases or twice?
 
To understand hearing and why 'simply listening' is not accurate has everything to do with psycho-acoustics (perception) and is a very complex subject.
Books have been written about it.


and watch this video (or read his book). This guy knows AND more importantly is capable to explain the important aspects so mortals can understand it.

 
Last edited:
If the example size instead of 1, for example 100 or thousand would you think biases or twice?
Please read the FAQ. We are toying with you

 
I just realized the banner atop the Jupiter "Condenser" site is waxes poetic.

All of our products present life-like vibrance,
true presence, dreamy aural decay,
and detail to take your breath away.

That right there is worth at least $10 of the MSRP, I'd say.

Oh, and I forgot to provide a link to Jupiter's wares!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom