• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

FIIO KA15 Portable DAC & Headphone Amp Review

Rate this DAC & HP amp:

  • Poor

    Votes: 1 11.1%
  • Not terrible

    Votes: 4 44.4%
  • Fine

    Votes: 4 44.4%
  • Great

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    9

jkim

Senior Member
Forum Donor
Joined
May 23, 2024
Messages
306
Likes
633
Location
US
Fiio_KA15_pic.jpg
PXL_20250515_152808390.MP~2.jpg
PXL_20250515_152939699.MP~2.jpg


The Fiio KA15 is a portable USB DAC/headphone amplifier recently released (Fall 2024) by Fiio. Key features are:
  • High output power: 560 mW per channel into 32 Ohm (in balanced desktop mode)
  • Dual CS43198 (DAC chips) + SGM8262 (op-amps)
  • 10-band on-device parametric EQ
  • Not a dongle-type yet compact form factor
If all these are true and it measures well, then it will be a very nice device worth its asking price, currently $126 (as of May 2025).
Note. An ASR member kindly sent this device for testing. Thank you!

Measurement Setup
  • AD converter: E1DA Cosmos ADCiso Grade A in Mono Mode, and Cosmos Scaler as a buffer.
  • Analog preamp: E1DA Cosmos APU for 1 kHz SINAD and low-level tests.
  • Software: Room EQ Wizard (v5.4 beta 80) for most of the tests, and Paul Kane's Multitone Loopback Analyzer (v1.2.9).
  • Some test results were compared to the performance of the JCALLY JM20 and JM20 MAX whose measurements were made in exactly the same setup.
  • Unless otherwise noted, the device's balanced outputs were measured in its Desktop and Class AB mode.
Results

Starting with a 1 kHz sinusoidal test of its balanced outputs under no load (20 kOhms):
Fiio_KA15_Bal_1kHz_SINAD.png


This is on par with a desktop device's performance.

Another 1 kHz sinusoidal test of its unbalanced outputs under no load (10 kOhms):
Fiio_KA15_UnBal_1kHz_SINAD.png


Excellent performance. Only a slight decrease in SINAD due to weaker fundamental tones.

Low-level, 50 mV output performance:
Fiio_KA15_50mV_1kHz_SINAD.png


As expected, for the same 50 mV level, its unbalanced output has a lower noise floor.

It provides choices of LP filters:
Filter_Responses.png


Frequency response (w/ Fast-PC filter) is as expected:
Fiio_KA15_FR_44.1kHz_Fs.png
Fiio_KA15_FR_96kHz_Fs.png


Jitter test:
J24_Test.png


Jitter suppression is not perfect, but these small errors should not be audible.

Multitone test:
Fiio_KA15_32MT_0dB.png


SMPTE IMD measurements versus output levels:
Fiio_IMD_SMPTE_vs_Level.png


The IMD results of the three devices shown---Fiio KA15, JCally JM20 and JM20 MAX---are essentially the same as each other, except small differences near their maximum output levels. In particular, the JM20's IMD rises near the max output under this 300 Ohm load because its headphone driver integrated into CS43131 has lower current capability than the other two devices' separate op-amps.

THD+N versus frequency:
Fiio_THDN_vs_Frq.png

Note. These measurements were made at the signal level of -6 dBFS.
Nothing to be concerned about.

Output power of its unbalanced output:
Fiio_KA15_UnBal_THDN_vs_Power.png

Note. All these measurements were made with both channels driven.

Its unbalanced outputs are as powerful as many similar devices' balanced outputs!

Let's see its balanced output power:
Fiio_KA15_Bal_THDN_vs_Power.png

Note. All these measurements were made with both channels driven.

Output power from this small device is incredible. This is the record-shattering, highest-output portable USB DAC/headphone amp among the devices tested at ASR so far.

In case you want to see the same results on the output voltage scale:
Fiio_KA15_UnBal_THDN_vs_Voltage.pngFiio_KA15_Bal_THDN_vs_Voltage.png

(Output impedance measurements of both balanced and unbalanced outputs will be posted when I get a chance to measure.)

All the measurements reported above indicate excellent, if not state-of-the art, performance of the KA15. In particular, its measured output power is unbelievable. However, the story does not end here.

There is something very interesting that is not found by the standard package of measurements. We saw the results of a 32-tone test earlier, which was performed at the maximum unclipped signal level. Normally, if we feed the same signal at a lower level, the ratio of the signal to distortion/noise deteriorates only slightly because of the weaker signal. For some CS43131- and CS43198-based devices, this is not the case---see here for more information.

Unfortunately, the FIIO KA15 turns out to be one of the devices producing elevated noise and distortion when fed with multitone signals at lower levels. See below for normal FFT results of 32-tone signals at high levels:
Fiio_KA15_32MT_0_6dB.png

These are great results.

But as the signal gets weaker, we get the following problematic responses:
Fiio_KA15_32MT_11_28dB.png


Yes, for a very wide range of signal strengths, we get quite nasty responses, losing several bits of resolution!

The response becomes normal when the signal reaches a much lower level:
Fiio_KA15_32MT_36dB.png


To see the entire picture, a sweep of 32-tone tests across a range of signal strengths was performed:
Fiio_KA15_32MT_vs_Level.png


Notice a huge "hump" which indicates the rise of total distortion + noise in a range of signal strengths. This may be dubbed a "Cirrus hump." In comparison, the JCALLY JM20 and JM20 MAX do not show this behavior in the same measurements.

One may think this measurement condition, made of 32 equal-amplitude tones, is unrealistic which may never occur in real audio contents. In fact, these signal processing defects can be found with any multitone signals, even with dual tones, as long as tone components are in similar amplitude. See below:
Fiio_KA15_IMD_TDFD_0-36dB.png


This dual-tone signal, called "TDFD Bass" in Room EQ Wizard, is simply composed of 41 Hz and 89 Hz sine tones. As with multitone signals, the KA15 distorts in a wide range of signal strengths. Again, to see the big picture, a sweep of these dual-tone (TDFD Bass) IMD tests across a range of signal strengths was performed:
Fiio_KA15_IMD_TDFD_vs_Level.png


Conclusion

So, what can we say? It is still difficult to tell how clearly audible these measured distortions would be in reality. Of course, it should depend on audio content. But given the fact that this problem is observed even in a simple dual-tone test reported above, it is no wonder Roman at RAA was able to easily spot a movie soundtrack to demonstrate the distortion. Obviously this is an engineering flaw that should not occur in a DA converter targeted at Hi-Fi markets and consumers.

The FIIO KA15 would have been an ideal recipe for a portable USB DAC/HP amp for those looking for high output power and hardware parametric EQ in a small form factor. Only if it had been implemented properly. In its current implementation, I cannot recommend it. In fact, I am in the process of testing quite a few CS431xx-based devices, some of which are mine and others were sent by an ASR member. Eleven of them in total! Unfortunately, except for a few dongles (including the JCALLY JM20 and JM20 MAX), most of them exhibit this problematic behavior. Based on these observations, like Roman at RAA I also believe it can be resolved by firmware design. But the problem is that there is no clear register in the chips' datasheets that must be related to this behavior. No one knows for certain, perhaps except for Cirrus Logic engineers (or even worse, former Wolfson engineers). I am planning to write another special review on this issue, covering these CS431xx-based devices..

Other Remarks:
  • The distortion behavior is not affected by the Class H or Class AB mode in the firmware setting.
  • The distortion occurs under any impedance load.
 
Last edited:
Reserved as a placeholder
 
God.. Just 15 minutes ago, I've gone through a dongle dac suggestions video by Crinacle and thought I've finally found my dream device, a small dongle with lots of power, low distortion and hardware parametric EQ, all in one. I was flying.. So much party pooping in here :p I got a Topping G5 which is stellar but big, heavy and no hardware EQ.
1) Yeah now the big question is.. how audible are these distortions?
2) Is there anything similar to this Fiio KA15 in the market right now?
3) My mobile listening setup is iPhone 16 pro max, Topping G5 and Tidal. Last time I checked, like two years ago, there was basically no way to properly EQ my headphones with this setup. I resorted to a very wonky app called Boom which offers some basic EQ functionalities while drawing the music library from Tidal. But yeah, it's pretty bad. Have there been any software or else developments in the meantime?
 
Last edited:
A bit disappointing….. was just wanting to buy one
Did the company react in any way? Something like „We aim to correct this“ sorta?
 
Thank you @jkim , you are doing a fantastic job in analyzing these CS based dongles hidden behaviors. Audible or not, this "CS hump" is clearly a design fault, what we still didn't understand is if manufacturers producing not faulty devices, like Jically JM 20 and JM 20 Max, are actually doing it knowing how to achieve it or if it is just a casual combination of unknown factors, given that "someone" anticipated to me that Jcally JM 20 PRO is conversely affected by the issue.

As for the KA15, it's on the pricey side for my standard, I don't strictly need neither additional power nor hardware PEQ, and 50 mV noise is clearly affected by the great power, so it would have been a pass for me even if it wasn't affected by the "hump".

Thank you again to you an to the mysterious dongles lender! ;) :cool:
 
God.. Just 15 minutes ago, I've gone through a dongle dac suggestions video by Crinacle and thought I've finally found my dream device, a small dongle with lots of power, low distortion and hardware parametric EQ, all in one. I was flying.. So much party pooping in here :p I got a Topping G5 which is stellar but big, heavy and no hardware EQ.
1) Yeah now the big question is.. how audible are these distortions?
2) Is there anything similar to this Fiio KA15 in the market right now?
3) My mobile listening setup is iPhone 16 pro max, Topping G5 and Tidal. Last time I checked, like two years ago, there was basically no way to properly EQ my headphones with this setup. I resorted to a very wonky app called Boom which offers some basic EQ functionalities while drawing the music library from Tidal. But yeah, it's pretty bad. Have there been developments in the meantime?
- Listen to the recorded samples on the RAA page. Note the samples were amplified for the distortion to be heard. I also recorded the original file playing from problematic devices. When not amplified, it is borderline audible.

- Still not many similar devices (high power & hardware PEQ). If you need one, consider the FIIO KA17 or Qudelix T71 for very high output power. If you do not need that much power, then Qudelix 5K or Neutron HiFi Dac V1 is another consideration.
 
Last edited:
A bit disappointing….. was just wanting to buy one
Did the company react in any way? Something like „We aim to correct this“ sorta?
I hope DAC manufacturers will react and a solution will become common knowledge.
 
What is the class mode setting when testing multitone? The DAC has class AB mode. How does the multitone behave in Class AB settings?
 
View attachment 451164View attachment 451166View attachment 451167

The Fiio KA15 is a portable USB DAC/headphone amplifier recently released (Fall 2024) by Fiio. Key features are:
  • High output power: 560 mW per channel into 32 Ohm (in balanced desktop mode)
  • Dual CS43198 (DAC chips) + SGM8262 (op-amps)
  • 10-band on-device parametric EQ
  • Not a dongle-type yet compact form factor
If all these are true and it measures well, then it will be a very nice device worth its asking price, currently $126 (as of May 2025).


Measurement Setup
  • AD converter: E1DA Cosmos ADCiso Grade A in Mono Mode, and Cosmos Scaler as a buffer.
  • Analog preamp: E1DA Cosmos APU for 1 kHz SINAD and low-level tests.
  • Software: Room EQ Wizard (v5.4 beta 80) for most of the tests, and Paul Kane's Multitone Loopback Analyzer (v1.2.9).
  • Some test results were compared to the performance of the JCALLY JM20 and JM20 MAX whose measurements were made in exactly the same setup.
  • Unless otherwise noted, the device's balanced outputs were measured in its Desktop and Class AB mode.
Results

Starting with a 1 kHz sinusoidal test of its balanced outputs under no load (20 kOhms):
View attachment 451184

This is on par with a desktop device's performance.

Another 1 kHz sinusoidal test of its unbalanced outputs under no load (10 kOhms):
View attachment 451187

Excellent performance. Only a slight decrease in SINAD due to weaker fundamental tones.

Low-level, 50 mV output performance:
View attachment 451205

As expected, for the same 50 mV level, its unbalanced output has a lower noise floor.

It provides choices of LP filters:
View attachment 451214

Frequency response (w/ Fast-PC filter) is as expected:
View attachment 451215View attachment 451216

Jitter test:
View attachment 451217

Jitter suppression is not perfect, but these small errors should not be audible.

Multitone test:
View attachment 451220

SMPTE IMD measurements versus output levels:
View attachment 451247

The IMD results of the three devices shown---Fiio KA15, JCally JM20 and JM20 MAX---are essentially the same as each other, except small differences near their maximum output levels. In particular, the JM20's IMD rises near the max output under this 300 Ohm load because its headphone driver integrated into CS43131 has lower current capability than the other two devices' separate op-amps.

THD+N versus frequency:
View attachment 451256

Nothing to be concerned about.

Output power of its unbalanced output:
View attachment 451259

Its unbalanced outputs are as powerful as many similar devices' balanced outputs!

Let's see its balanced output power:
View attachment 451260

Output power from this small device is incredible. This is the record-shattering, highest-output portable USB DAC/headphone amp among the devices tested at ASR so far.

In case you want to see the same results on the output voltage scale:
View attachment 451262View attachment 451261

(Output impedance measurements of both balanced and unbalanced outputs will be posted when I get a chance to measure.)

All the measurements reported above indicate excellent, if not state-of-the art, performance of the KA15. In particular, its measured output power is unbelievable. However, the story does not end here.

There is something very interesting that is not found by the standard package of measurements. We saw the results of a 32-tone test earlier, which was performed at the maximum unclipped signal level. Normally, if we feed the same signal at a lower level, the ratio of the signal to distortion/noise deteriorates only slightly because of the weaker signal. For some CS43131- and CS43198-based devices, this is not the case---see here for more information.

Unfortunately, the FIIO KA15 turns out to be one of the devices producing elevated noise and distortion when fed with multitone signals at lower levels. See below for normal FFT results of 32-tone signals at high levels:
View attachment 451274
These are great results.

But as the signal gets weaker, we get the following problematic responses:
View attachment 451275

Yes, for a very wide range of signal strengths, we get quite nasty responses, losing several bits of resolution!

The response becomes normal when the signal reaches a much lower level:
View attachment 451277

To see the entire picture, a sweep of 32-tone tests across a range of signal strengths was performed:
View attachment 451280

Notice a huge "hump" which indicates the rise of total distortion + noise in a range of signal strengths. This may be dubbed a "CS hump." In comparison, the JCALLY JM20 and JM20 MAX do not show this behavior in the same measurements.

One may think this measurement condition, made of 32 equal-amplitude tones, is unrealistic which may never occur in real audio contents. In fact, these signal processing defects can be found with any multitone signals, even with dual tones, as long as tone components are in similar amplitude. See below:
View attachment 451284

This dual-tone signal, called an TDFD-Bass IMD signal in Room EQ Wizard, is simply composed of 41 Hz and 89 Hz sine tones. As with multitone signals, the KA15 distorts in a wide range of signal strengths. Again, to see the big picture, a sweep of these dual-tone (TDFD-bass IMD) tests across a range of signal strengths was performed:
View attachment 451287

Conclusion

So, what can we say? It is still difficult to tell how clearly audible these measured distortions would be in reality. Of course, it should depend on audio content. But given the fact that this problem is observed even in a simple dual-tone test reported above, it is no wonder Roman at RAA was able to easily spot a movie soundtrack to demonstrate the distortion. Obviously this is an engineering defect that should not occur in a DA converter targeted at Hi-Fi markets and consumers.

The FIIO KA15 would have been an ideal recipe for a portable USB DAC/HP amp for those looking for high output power and hardware parametric EQ in a small form factor. Only if it had been implemented properly. In its current implementation, I cannot recommend it. In fact, I am in the process of testing quite a few CS431xx-based devices, some of which are mine and others were sent by an ASR member. Eleven of them in total! Unfortunately, except for a few dongles (including the JCALLY JM20 and JM20 MAX), most of them exhibit this problematic behavior. Based on these observations, like Roman at RAA I also believe it can be resolved by firmware design. But the problem is that there is no clear register in the chips' datasheets that must be related to this behavior. I am planning to write another special review on this issue, covering many CS431xx-based devices..
May i ask you if you think that these distortion issues are to be expected in every case and every load?
For example will it make and electric difference to the better if i use my Dt 1770 Pro which are relatively easy to drive?
And do you think they will be able to solve this via software or are we looking at a faulty design here?
 
What is the class mode setting when testing multitone? The DAC has class AB mode. How does the multitone behave in Class AB settings?
May i ask you if you think that these distortion issues are to be expected in every case and every load?
For example will it make and electric difference to the better if i use my Dt 1770 Pro which are relatively easy to drive?
And do you think they will be able to solve this via software or are we looking at a faulty design here?

Of course, I measured the distortion behavior in different firmware settings as well as under different impedance loads. Nothing changed the results.

I added the following information to the review:
Other Remarks:
  • The distortion behavior is not affected by the Class H or Class AB mode in the firmware setting.
  • The distortion occurs under any impedance load.

As for whether the problem can be solved, I wrote in the conclusion:
Based on these observations, like Roman at RAA I also believe it can be resolved by firmware design. But the problem is that there is no clear register in the chips' datasheets that must be related to this behavior. No one knows for certain, perhaps except for Cirrus Logic engineers (or even worse, former Wolfson engineers).
 
Last edited:
- Listen to the recorded samples on the RAA page. Note the samples were amplified for the distortion to be heard. I also recorded the original file playing from problematic devices. When not amplified, it is borderline audible.

- Still not many similar devices (high power & hardware PEQ). If you need one, consider the FIIO KA17 or Qudelix T71 for very high output power. If you do not need that much power, then Qudelix 5K or Neutron HiFi Dac V1 is another consideration.
Thank you so much. I guess the FIIO KA17 might have the same distortion issues the FIIO KA15 has. So you're telling me that the Qudelix 5k can do everything I need? I guess I missed that product two years ago when I ended up buying the Topping G5 after my research.
1) Is the Qudelix 5k powerful enough to drive the HD800?
2) Am I losing any quality VS using my current setup with the Topping G5?
3) Is the Qudelix 5k currently still the best in its category?
 
Thank you so much. I guess the FIIO KA17 might have the same distortion issues the FIIO KA15 has. So you're telling me that the Qudelix 5k can do everything I need? I guess I missed that product two years ago when I ended up buying the Topping G5 after my research.
1) Is the Qudelix 5k powerful enough to drive the HD800?
2) Am I losing any quality VS using my current setup with the Topping G5?
3) Is the Qudelix 5k currently still the best in its category?
The FIIO KA17 should not have the same distortion issue since it is based on a different DAC chip, the ESS ES9069Q.

But if you value a sophisticated user interface, the Qudelix is considered the best.

If you listen to music mostly at a moderate level, the 5K will be more than enough. You may want greater headroom only for music recorded softly like some classical music. Measurements may be worse than the G5, but audibly I doubt you will hear any difference.

The FIIO KA17 will provide more headroom, but likely not much more subjectively.

The Qudelix T71 is on another level. For high-impedance headphones like the HD800(S), it will be even more powerful than the Topping G5.
 
Thank you so much. I guess the FIIO KA17 might have the same distortion issues the FIIO KA15 has. So you're telling me that the Qudelix 5k can do everything I need? I guess I missed that product two years ago when I ended up buying the Topping G5 after my research.
1) Is the Qudelix 5k powerful enough to drive the HD800?
2) Am I losing any quality VS using my current setup with the Topping G5?
3) Is the Qudelix 5k currently still the best in its category?

1 : yes
2 : ?, define quality?
3 : yes, especially for iOS users

If I lost/broke my 5k I’d order a new one without considering anything else.
 
1 : yes
2 : ?, define quality?
3 : yes, especially for iOS users

If I lost/broke my 5k I’d order a new one without considering anything else.
The FIIO KA17 should not have the same distortion issue since it is based on a different DAC chip, the ESS ES9069Q.

But if you value a sophisticated user interface, the Qudelix is considered the best.

If you listen to music mostly at a moderate level, the 5K will be more than enough. You may want greater headroom only for music recorded softly like some classical music. Measurements may be worse than the G5, but audibly I doubt you will hear any difference.

The FIIO KA17 will provide more headroom, but likely not much more subjectively.

The Qudelix T71 is on another level. For high-impedance headphones like the HD800(S), it will be even more powerful than the Topping G5.
Yeah, by quality I mean audible audio quality, absence of audible distortions of any sort. Consider that the HD800 needs some relatively heavy EQ corrections as well, especially on the bass response.
I do listen to classical music and high dynamic range music and that's why I'm afraid the Qudelix 5k might have some limitations to due its limited power.
At the same time I feel like the Qudelix T71 is an overkill in terms of price and probably bigger size and weight too.
Then we have the Fiio KA17 which might be perfect on paper but then it seems it's miles away from Qudelix in terms of software usability.
Is my analysis correct or am I missing any other products to be considered?
Why is it that we can never be fully satisfied? :D
 
Last edited:
Why is it that we can never be fully satisfied? :D
The reason is simple. For portable, USB-bus-powered HP amps, their maximum output voltage is rarely above 4 Vrms. The FIIO KA15 and KA17 are exceptions. The Qudelix T71 uses a battery like the Topping G5, and hence is larger in size. Sure, some Bluetooth DAC/HP amps, like the Qudelix 5K, use batteries, but in that case the main purpose is to use the Bluetooth function and the battery capacity is small for portability.

And you want user-friendly on-device PEQ.

You cannot have everything in one :)
 
Last edited:
Yeah, by quality I mean audible audio quality, absence of audible distortions of any sort. Consider that the HD800 needs some relatively heavy EQ corrections as well, especially on the bass response.
I do listen to classical music and high dynamic range music and that's why I'm afraid the Qudelix 5k might have some limitations to due its limited power.
At the same time I feel like the Qudelix T71 is an overkill in terms of price and probably bigger size and weight too.
Then we have the Fiio KA17 which might be perfect on paper but then it seems it's miles away from Qudelix in terms of software usability.
Is my analysis correct or am I missing any other products to be considered?
Why is it that we can never be fully satisfied? :D
Just my honest opinion. You are mentioning the HD800 and then say that the T71 with its 300 bucks is overkill? It somehow does not compute to me.
Thats a fraction of the cost of the HD800.
I think in your case the T71 is THE way to go. Extra power is never a bad thing especially if you do-if you plan to do heavy processing in the low end which eats up
power headroom pretty fast. It makes no sense to be listening to highly dynamic music as you say, using some of the best headphones and then choose the weaker amplifier.
My two cents. Go for the one with more driving reserves
 
- Listen to the recorded samples on the RAA page. Note the samples were amplified for the distortion to be heard. I also recorded the original file playing from problematic devices. When not amplified, it is borderline audible.

- Still not many similar devices (high power & hardware PEQ). If you need one, consider the FIIO KA17 or Qudelix T71 for very high output power. If you do not need that much power, then Qudelix 5K or Neutron HiFi Dac V1 is another consideration.

Hi, and thanks for your review!

After listening to the same song choice as the test on the KA15 from a 24bit 48kHz source at different levels and comparing them to a laptop DAC (which may also be CS), I can't find any evidence of "clicking" on either. Maybe these distortion products are sample or test specific?

In any case, and FWIW, I haven't heard any clicking or clipping on music produced by the DAC that wan't there to begin with in the recording.
 
Last edited:
Hi. After listening to the same song choice as the test on the KA15 from a 24bit 48kHz source at different levels and comparing them to a laptop DAC (which may also be CS), I can't find any evidence of "clicking" on either. Maybe these distortion products are sample or test specific? In any case, FWIW, I haven't heard any clicking or clipping on music produced by the DAC that wan't there to begin with in the recording.
Which song or music sample do you mean? Have you tried the soundtrack at the RAA site?
 
Back
Top Bottom