• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Fever FE-6J1-2 tube preamplifier kit review + listening test files

pma

Master Contributor
Technical Expert
Forum Donor
Joined
Feb 23, 2019
Messages
6,727
Likes
17,021
Location
Prague
This is a review and description of a FE-6J1-2 Tube preamplifier kit which can be ordered from many internet stores, e.g. AliExpress. I bought mine from a local store at about $18.
6J1_preamp.jpg

It is a simple circuit that is powered from external 12Vac power supply. It uses 6J1 tubes that are able to work at low 56Vdc voltage. This is obtained by voltage doublers that are a part of the circuit on the PCB. The preamp can be ordered as an assembled PCB or as a kit with a PCB and parts included, for DIY soldering.

I soldered the board and put it into a case from Douk audio MC103 switch, which I have not been using anymore. Below you can see the photos of the assembled board and of the board in the case, as well as the schematics supplied with the kit.

P8140413 (2).jpg P8140412 (2).jpg P8140414 (2).jpg tube-sch.png

After soldering has been completed, the preamp has worked immediately, without issues. So I can show some usual measurements. There have been no parameters mentioned from the supplier, except for schematics, BOM and notes about the 12Vac power supply voltage.

Measurements – general

All measurements were done with a 100 kOhm load, as it is a tube preamp with high output impedance. I am using my unity gain buffer (op-amp + BUF634T) with 100k input impedance for such purposes, placed before the Cosmos ADC input. DAC used was Topping DX5 driven via optical cable, to avoid ground loops.

I am very sorry but I made the measurements with 1 kOhm load instead of 100 kOhm. Below are corrected measurements.

1. Input impedance

Input impedance is 50 kOhm and it is defined by the volume pot placed just at the preamp input.

2. Output impedance

Output impedance is high, 4.7 kOhm. So it has to be loaded by 50 kOhm or more, otherwise the preamplifier gain will be reduced. However, the preamplifier tolerates 10 kOhm load, with significant loss of gain and some drop at lowest frequencies.

3. Voltage gain

16.5 dB when loaded with 100 kOhm. The measurements below are made with volume pot set to gain +14dB

4. Frequency response

Tube_freqresp.png


At the high frequencies we can see the effect of volume pot set to +14dB. But it is still very good.

5. THD and THD+N at 1V

Tube_1k_1V.png


Though we usually measure THD+N at higher output voltage, this tube preamplifier has very high distortion at higher output level. So I am posting the spectrum at about 1V output. Distortion vs. output voltage will be shown later.

We have about 1% distortion at 2V. Though there is a filter with capacitance multiplier in the on-board power supply, the power supply ripple rejection is poor and we can see many mains related spectrum lines.

6. THD and THD+N vs. output voltage at 1kHz

Tube_thdnlevel.png


Again, the result is poor. THD+N is dominated by noise at low output voltage and above 1V it is dominated by distortion.

7. THD+N vs. frequency at 1V

Tube_thdnfreq.png


Distortion vs. frequencies is flat, however very high.

Listening

When connected to my main system, the hum from the preamp is unfortunately audible. Other than that, the sound is acceptable, as human ear is quite tolerant to non-linear distortion.

Conclusion

I cannot recommend this tube preamp for serious listening. If the goal is to learn something and try tubes and soldering, then it may have some value, regarding its low cost.

_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

There is a temptation to create a listening test with files recorded through this preamp, so here we go:

Test - Topping D10s/Cosmos ADC loop vs. Tube preamp (6J1) in the loop

link to the test files:

6J1_test.zip​


drive.google.com
drive.google.com

Please feel free to try the test and tell me if you hear the difference, and do not forget to post foobar abx test report.
I have also included a delta file (Deltawave difference) for you to hear how horrible is the "sound" of tube distortion in isolation. But, can you hear it when playing music?

I have also created an on-line version of the test:

6J1 tube preamp vs. Topping DAC/Cosmos ADC loop · FunkyABX​


abx.funkybits.fr
abx.funkybits.fr
 
Last edited:
I am verry sorry but the measurement were at first done with 1 kOhm load by mistake. The post #1 has now been corrected and plots re-measured with 100 kOhm load. This has improved low frequency response and increased usable output voltage. The 1 kOhm load resistors were soldered by me earlier from the bottom of the PCB to reduce gain, now they have been removed.
 
Yeah. It is all only shifted to higher voltage output and improved in LF response by higher impedance load behind the output coupling capacitor.
 
Some more photos ...

P1060302-1.JPG


P1060299-1.JPG
 
At higher output voltage level, sine wave distortion is visible even at the oscilloscope screen. Here at 9.90 Vp-p (3.50 Vrms):

IMG_4661.jpeg


But it is not "hard" clipping.
 
Last edited:
The squares and step response are close to optimum. Step response is a simple [1 - exp(-t/RC)].

IMG_4662.jpeg


IMG_4663.jpeg
 
Thanks pma. I've seen worse, I guess. Seems odd they used pentodes triode-strapped but didn't use twin triode tubes and buffer the outputs with cathode followers.
 
Wow, they put the big yellow coupling (I assume?) caps right next to the tubes...
Yeah, they are input and output MKT foil capacitors.
 
Thanks pma. I've seen worse, I guess. Seems odd they used pentodes triode-strapped but didn't use twin triode tubes and buffer the outputs with cathode followers.
The biggest issue with this one is the level of mains related spuriae. It is audible and annoying. Other than that, the sound is OK. Distortion is mostly low order and inaudible on music, if the output is kept below 2V and load impedance is high enough. However, I cannot see a reason why to put this preamp into a normal audio chain, other than curiosity.
 
The biggest issue with this one is the level of mains related spuriae. It is audible and annoying. Other than that, the sound is OK. Distortion is mostly low order and inaudible on music, if the output is kept below 2V and load impedance is high enough. However, I cannot see a reason why to put this preamp into a normal audio chain, other than curiosity.
I *assume* people want "tube sound". And at $18, it's cheap enough.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pma
Thanks pma. I've seen worse, I guess. Seems odd they used pentodes triode-strapped but didn't use twin triode tubes and buffer the outputs with cathode followers.
They just made it in most simple way, speaking about circuit design. With a bit complicated power supply section, but maybe the idea to use 12Vac safe supply is a good idea for beginners, though at a penalty of higher hum components.

Maybe @amirm will inform us about more sophisticated tube circuits he might have seen at Shenzhen show :).
 
They just made it in most simple way, speaking about circuit design. With a bit complicated power supply section, but maybe the idea to use 12Vac safe supply is a good idea for beginners, though at a penalty of higher hum components.
Yes, the low voltage is a good plan, for that reason and economy. There's a world of old low-voltage tubes meant for car radios, but most likely they're expensive now.
 
I looked at the schematic again as I was thinking the (+/-)B+ was regulated but see it is using capacitive multipliers after the voltage doublers. Which makes me wonder if the hum is from the half-wave heater circuit, or maybe just tight and/or poor layout. Looks like signal input/output lines route through the power supply circuit. I cannot tell how many layers in the PCB.

I also wondered why not twin triodes with the second stage as a follower, but the plate resistors are only 4.7k ohms, so not super high output impedance for tube gear (probably due to the low plate voltage).
 
I looked at the schematic again as I was thinking the (+/-)B+ was regulated but see it is using capacitive multipliers after the voltage doublers. Which makes me wonder if the hum is from the half-wave heater circuit, or maybe just tight and/or poor layout. Looks like signal input/output lines route through the power supply circuit. I cannot tell how many layers in the PCB.

Analog ground (0V) is messed with -28V common reference for the tube due to split +/-28V supply for the tube. Thus, analog ground is routed via C8 (470uF) in the PSU and as such cannot be clean enough. Please check the drawing below, with the analog ground (common) in green. And, PSRR of the simple common cathode circuit is miserable.

The circuit is what it is and as such has been measured.

tube-sch1.png
 
Analog ground (0V) is messed with -28V common reference for the tube due to split +/-28V supply for the tube. Thus, analog ground is routed via C8 (470uF) in the PSU and as such cannot be clean enough. Please check the drawing below, with the analog ground (common) in green. And, PSRR of the simple common cathode circuit is miserable.

The circuit is what it is and as such has been measured.

View attachment 551958
Makes perfect sense, my bad for not looking closely enough. They'd done better to generate +56 V/0 V but PSRR would be lousy anyway.

Understand it is what it is, just always curious about what went wrong and wondering what could be done better.
 
  • Like
Reactions: pma
Your results seem to align with those of Michael Beeny, who tested the same tube preamp kit. Note, I believe its the same kit (but just a heads-up, I'm not sure about that).In any case, that kit uses the same 6J1 tubes.

Michael Beeny thought the crosstalk was pretty poor—36 dB—and he noted, just like you, pma, that the hum was unfortunately high.

Here are some screenshots of his measurement results:
Screenshot_2026-08-15_230846.504.jpgScreenshot_2026-08-15_230954.420.jpgScreenshot_2026-08-15_231346.820.jpgScreenshot_2026-08-15_231421.746.jpg

 
Last edited:
It seems to be the same circuit schematics, with small changes like different capacitor manufacturers and shapes. This kit, with the same circuit, has been produced for many years by many manufacturers and sold by many web shops. The parameters are likely to be very similar.
 
It seems to be the same circuit schematics, with small changes like different capacitor manufacturers and shapes. This kit, with the same circuit, has been produced for many years by many manufacturers and sold by many web shops. The parameters are likely to be very similar.
Aha.

Both you and Michael Beeny sum it up more or less the same way—basically, it’s not exactly serious hi-fi (not even good), but if you want to try out tubes and do some assembly and soldering, then why not? It could be a fun project. :) It doesn't cost much.

Thanks for the review, PMA. That was interesting.:)
 
  • Like
Reactions: pma
Back
Top Bottom