• Welcome to ASR. There are many reviews of audio hardware and expert members to help answer your questions. Click here to have your audio equipment measured for free!

Exploring a Neural Network-based Audio Upsampler: Overcoming the Ringing/Mirroring Trade-off

Please read this paper.

I'm not saying that the difference is clear enough for everyone to recognize. It's a very small difference. However, there are statistical studies that humans can perceive the difference between high-resolution and low one.

The same argument can be made for digital cameras. I think there is a high possibility that we will slightly feel hallucination and spurious resolution good, even if they are mathematically incorrect.

---
(edit)The translation wasn't very good and didn't reflect my intentions, so I ended up changing quite a bit of the text. I'm sorry.
The link doesn't work for me, but I assume you read it: is there any control for distortion? IMD can create distortion in the audible spectrum from content above it. I don't know whether the level can be high enough to be audible, but since the main difference being examined, the sampling rate, is also considered to be below the threshold of audibility by most, it seems really important to examine whether what the subjects are hearing are just unfortunate artifacts of the chain or not.

I remember reading a study from Japan a few years ago that had zero mention of managing distortion at all.
 
Back
Top Bottom