The specialized CA20K DSP/controller on bona fide PCI and PCIE X-Fi cards are actually pretty advanced, as described in the attached PDF files.
Also, with Daniel_K drivers, these cards still have good support for recent Windows.
We have to do something. The graphs has over 4000 pixels horizontally and keeps growing! Vertically it would go on forever.BTW, is it perhaps time to recalibrate the SINAD chart, and eliminate the bottom 20% or so?
We have to do something. The graphs has over 4000 pixels horizontally and keeps growing! Vertically it would go on forever.
Perhaps making a spreadsheet and exporting it to <.pdf> and then the ASR users can download the entire pdf to view it. The cellular telephone users will like that too I imagine because it will be vertically oriented rather than horizontal.We have to do something. The graphs has over 4000 pixels horizontally and keeps growing! Vertically it would go on forever.
Does yours have a heatsink on the X-Fi chip? Those without apparently are quite unreliable. Not sure whether its just solder joints or actual internal degradation.My soundcard have some hardware problem because of age (for unknown reason the card dissapear from peripherical)
I have both X-Fi XtremeMusic (PCI) and X-Fi Titanium HD (PCIE). I bought the former one in 2005 and the latter one in 2013. Both cards don't have heatsink, actaually, one of them even has a sticker on the chip. Both cards have no problem in device detection, but the 2005 card's headphone output is damaged and has increased distortion.Does yours have a heatsink on the X-Fi chip? Those without apparently are quite unreliable. Not sure whether its just solder joints or actual internal degradation.
Measurements to back that up?The 'high' distortion of this audio card is due to the AD8056 opamps, swapping to OPA1612 will greatly improve THD and SINAD if you want that.
Or you could look up the spec sheets of the two chips.Measurements to back that up?
I can believe it. The AD8056 is a video amplifier with wide bandwidth (300 MHz) but relatively poor distortion figures (by audio standards). The published specs are difficult to compare since their frequency ranges barely overlap. That said, the OPA1612 seems to be far better within its intended operating range (audio). Of course, something entirely different could still be limiting the performance of the card as a whole.Measurements to back that up?
I should have been been more verbose. I'd like to know if @Brain is saying this on the basis of having made the substitution in this product, with measurements to share, has swapped and made controlled or uncontrolled listening tests only, or whether it's just plausible suggestion based on looking at the datasheets but hasn't actually been tested.
Why would they use these copious numbers of through hole resistors? Street cred? They have their use if there is a significant voltage swing across them, but I doubt this is the case here, and there are also high wattage, low tempco surface mount options these days.Here is a hi-res picture of AKM chip for L and R on the main board. The Tantalum ones are the gold with stripe (EC102 and EC103) on either side of the AKM chip I believe.
View attachment 108081
Interestingly, the daughter-board for the other 6 channels using the same AKM chip do not have the Tantalum capacitors.
View attachment 108093
The biggest problem (IMHO) with tantalum capacitors is that tantalum is a conflict mineral.
Measurements to back that up?