And I have not seen the Tantalum cap on the picture either. So I don't know where did they put it.
Can it be used as a multi channel DAC to build active crossover?
That's true, wonder if it would work with any other OS than Windows, too.The performance certainly isn't bad, but unfortunately these internal soundcards always have severe driver issues sooner or later.
Apparently with the first EVGA Nu Audio it was so bad that many people quit using it, there were a surprinsing number of complaints in the computer forums I usually visit considering that not many people bought a 300€ sound card in the first place.
The previous one did, but you had to downgrade the firmware to the original version, and there were some limitations. I haven't checked to see if any new quirks have been added to the kernel since, so it might have improved.That's true, wonder if it would work with any other OS than Windows, too.
This card is for those who use a full size ATX board, and before complaining why don't make it external, if they do this, it will either be more expensive, or have poorer performance. Also, it is an unbalanced soundcard with no adjustable analog I/O voltage, so even if the measurements rival some studio interfaces, they can't be used in the same way.
An owner of a full size atx board in a full size atx casing today is likely a gamer who needs 8 channels at zero latency.
I have a full-size ATX board in my workstation. The only built-in interfaces are storage (NVMe, SATA), 10G Ethernet, and USB. No sound. It does have 7 x16 PCIe 4.0 slots, though.I'd have been into these internal sound cards years ago if I still like to tinker with my PCs but nowadays I just want things to work in the most hassle free way and external USB DAC/ADC like the ones Creative offer would be my first choice if I ever need one. Otherwise I'd just settle with whatever my board has especially for mics. Also, I'd rather save those limited PCI-E slots for stuff like NVME cards instead.
This one: https://www.asrockrack.com/general/productdetail.asp?Model=ROMED8-2Tlol man that sounds like a highly specialized ATX board (maybe for bitcoin mining, but then why would you need a sound card for such a board?), mind if you tell me its model?
This is a review and detailed measurements of the EVGA NU Audio Pro 7.1 Surround DAC, headphone amplifier and ADC. It was kindly purchased new by a member and drop shipped to me. It costs US $300 on Amazon including free shipping.
I like the slick coloring and logo:
View attachment 108041
But I hate, hate, hate dealing with internal sound cards!
I believe both Nu Audio products utilise an XMOS chip combined with a PCI>USB scheme. A glorified USB device rather than a 'sound card', but I guess it's fine for most end-users... I suppose they don't notice the difference as long as the device is stable and does its work.Back to the card under review, is this the one that has a USB host controller interfacing a USB audio device inside?
Someone mentioned lower latency as a possible motivation for using an internal sound card. Being a USB device in disguise, this one obviously doesn't offer that advantage.I believe both Nu Audio products utilise an XMOS chip combined with a PCI>USB scheme. A glorified USB device rather than a 'sound card', but I guess it's fine for most end-users... I suppose they don't notice the difference as long as the device is stable and does its work.
The previous one certainly used USB internally - it's discussed in the evga forum thread I linked earlier. I'd expect this one to be similar - it might be visible in the board level photos.Back to the card under review, is this the one that has a USB host controller interfacing a USB audio device inside?
so it didn't really lowered the USB latency
For gaming soundcards I guess Creative is the only one who still uses a dedicated PCIE controller. Asus and others used some CMedia chips (they make both PCI and USB chips).Back to the card under review, is this the one that has a USB host controller interfacing a USB audio device inside?