Sorry, missed seeing your wink.Was a joke, sarcasm: by convention we put the smiley on phrases that could suggest the opposite of the author's intention. Totally agree with you, in fact I purchased the Ultra in pre-order
Sorry, missed seeing your wink.Was a joke, sarcasm: by convention we put the smiley on phrases that could suggest the opposite of the author's intention. Totally agree with you, in fact I purchased the Ultra in pre-order
Device vulnerability can also be secured at the router firewall if there are no more security update from the manufacturer.The moment you get into streaming, you are signing up to have an OS. Here, it is advertised. But in others when it is not Android, it is not. Those OS platforms could very well be attacked and in many instances come with no update to the OS.
My question remains, what if any benefit is there to the A8 over an A6/Kara combo.There aren't many features I need but I do want xlr ins-and-outs for the preamp, would prefer to have the dac and preamp as separate units and to keep the total pre-tax cost under $2k or so. After considering a number of options I've somewhat narrowed it down to either a Schiit Kara/Eversolo A6 combo (I only need two digital inputs for a dac and two xlr inputs on the preamp side) or an Eversolo A8. I had considered the Topping Pre90 but I have general concerns about Topping reliability specific concerns with reported remote control issues. Other than the additional digital inputs, is there any real advantage (space is not an issue) to the A8 over the Kara/A6 combo? Is there something else I should be looking at?
Because men (and other folks) of a certain age are afraid to learn new skills and tinker with an OSI have to say this again in this review thread: a $300 laptop running your choice of OS plus a $150 DAC of decent quality can do the same as this product but has a much better and more versatile "viewscreen". Why people are adverse to a "computer" as part of their audio system but would buy this sort of component for much more that is, essentially, just a computer with a really small screen really mystifies me!
If you will just be passing stereo audio to a DAC from software the OS is used straight up, no changes at all. It's only if you need to also have input switching and are doing DSP that something more than "I can use a mouse" is needed. In the example system I described the OS is WIN11 unaltered. It couldn't be simpler. A mobile phone is more complicated than thatBecause men (and other folks) of a certain age are afraid to learn new skills and tinker with an OS
I have the A8 and you can use REW to create left and right FIR filters and upload them to the Eversolo unit and load them in the DSP part. Easy peasy free room correction if you already have a DSP mic.Thanks for the review! Great figures but no room correction (ouch, that breaks the value proposition for me in this kind of device), BT with just SBC/AAC.
That's exactly what I did. I had a Parasound JC2 BP and the Eversolo DMP A6. I sold them both and bought a new A8. The preamp in the A8 surprisingly outperforms the Parasound in sound quality by a large margin. It doesn't have as much gain as the Parasound though.What to say: excellent rating without reservations!
I confess that it makes me want to go to my music room take photos of the Dac and preamp, put them up for sale to finance the purchase of this A8.
A8 wich, as we see from Amirm's tests, contains the best available today in a single device.
Great job Eversolo! they have not succumbed to the useless trend of repetitive and mile-long price lists: a few well-built products, with excellent performance and with a concrete focus on what is really needed. Always with overall affordable prices.
This A8 in particular costs the equivalent of purchasing an excellent DAC and an equally excellent preamp
Thanks Amirm as always for the time dedicated and for the tests performed.
They do the Marantz AV10Presumably the only economy would be in the casework, the electronics would have to multiply the cost by the increase in number of channels and maybe smaller production batches increasing production costs again anyway.
I don't see why a 7 channel system with identical performance should be expected to be much less than 7/2 times more than this, ie about $7k
Not all HPF are created equal: What are the -3dB and -6dB frequencies?I know the Billie Eilish songs use high-pass filters.
I believe eversolo will implement this feature in the near futureWiim pro (or ultra) and rme adi2 dac is more versatile and cheaper.
The eversolo would need extensive room correction or eq options.
I think you have to be a pretty "well known" customer before a HiFi store will lend you equipment like that.While I find his blind tests fun exercises, I must say I'm a bit skeptical about what we will actually hear in such a test.
1. Isn't the quality of the A/D converter in his RME ADI-2 Pro FS set the “limit” and “color” the recordings of the signal coming out of the 3 DACs, and by that introduce some “sameness”?
2. Aren’t the different DACs in all the different systems used to listen to the recordings of the 3 DACs set the “limit” and “color” the sound in their ways, and therefore possibly reduce any differences and introduce “sameness” even further?
Maybe I should visit my local HiFi store and see if I can borrow a Linn Klimax DSM with the Organik DAC for a week, make recordings of my favorite albums with the excellent A/D converter in my Prism Sound Titan, and with that make my Linn Akurate DSM with the Katalyst DAC sound like the Linn Klimax DSM.
Not all HPF are created equal: What are the -3dB and -6dB frequencies?
Her 2nd song ("Lunch"), in her latest album (2024) sure sounds like it is reaching well into the sub-bass range.
Why he measured she’s whole discography? Can be considered “sonic harassment”?Not according to @staticV3 who measured Billie Eilish's whole discography. The only track reaching the sub-bass region is the song "Bittersuite" which is the ninth song in the same album as “Lunch”.
Yes, I would. Given the price of 4TB of internal storage it would be an enormous waste to use it only as internal buffer. NAS hardware that supports SSD storage is expensive too. And it would remove yet another device from my LAN. So I think that would make a great proposition. Even if Eversolo would have to use a more powerful processor.So you want it to be a NAS as well?
Again, opinions without data are useless. The product has not been out and you have an opinion, sure.....Nah, it's cold, harsh and bright! ;-)
Because He can.Why he measured she’s whole discography?
Ok, I thought was another ASR mystery, I’m learning a lot of technical stuff here but even more about human obsessions. Of course I include minesBecause He can.
I think the idea is to make it into an all-in-one-player, like a CD player with a near-infinite stack of CDs inside. You can use SATA SSDs in a NAS designed for HDDs. OK, you don't the full performance, but it's still much faster than HDDs and how much speed do you need anyway?Yes, I would. Given the price of 4TB of internal storage it would be an enormous waste to use it only as internal buffer. NAS hardware that supports SSD storage is expensive too. And it would remove yet another device from my LAN. So I think that would make a great proposition. Even if Eversolo would have to use a more powerful processor.
You didn't notice the ;-) ?Again, opinions without data are useless. The product has not been out and you have an opinion, sure.....